Flat Earth; Enclosed Creationism; Conspiracy (Theory), Intuition and Imagination – Part Eight:
Act Three: The creation of Adam and the ensuing flood thereafter:Depending on which teaching you follow, you will inevitably realize there are two distinct approaches concerning the esoteric teachings of the creator God. And that it either leans towards a wonderful and all-loving God, as depicted in the Bagghavita and Plato writings. Or a creator-God that is Satanic, as depicted in the Apocryphon of John. That’s not to say God is Satan, but merely pointing out interpretations and the study of individual authors alongside the techniques used and the stories they find important. And within those interpretations, notably, the documents of the Hebrew Bible depict the creator God (the God of the Hebrew Bible) as inferior or even evil – many of the ideas start to build up around a personified evil figure, sometimes called Satan, that gets attached to the creator God. So, you get a very satanic creator god in the Apocryphon of John.
The notion of Theodicy calls upon why a good God allows evil to exist – yet, in response, He sends the flood to distinguish evil from the very same evil he allowed. So then, it’s less about evil existing and more to do with evil emerging due to a characteristic of a creator-God who is always doing things incompatible with knowledge. The Old Testament gods are neither wise nor ethically good, even though they are supposed to have created an ethically superior system. Gnostics were aware of their imperfection by first acknowledging that it’s not through dismissing evil but rather by making aware that something went wrong. Upon creation of the planes (universe), the material substance of vast energies, power and impulse that came from supernal goodness does not ensure that certain elements may not go wrong through its course of divine creation. Omnipotence doesn’t explain this away. Gods did peculiar things which contradicted the ethical system they created.
He can create this world because he came from the spiritual world through the mistake of Sophia emanating from him. He can do this because he still preserves those spiritual elements in him. But, on the other hand, Yaldabaoth makes a simulated world (our reality) modelled on the spiritual realm with the help of his Archons; this ignorance is his primary characteristic, which effectively causes evil to emerge.
There is a plan by the spiritual realm to trick Yaldabaoth, and it is based on Sophia’s repentance and the notion of salvation. The spiritual realm implemented a strategy to bring back perfection because imperfection had emerged from Sophia’s mistake with Yaldabaoth. They formulated a plan to bring back the element of the spiritual realm, and humans would play a role in bringing back that perfection – by returning the power and light to the perfect spiritual realm through the souls of human beings. It must gain knowledge that will ultimately take the spiritual element trapped in the material realm that came via the creator God without him knowing it. And that it will eventually return to the oneness where it belongs.
It fails when Yaldabaoth tries to create an Adam based on the first Adam that emanated in the spiritual realm. It was inactive and motionless for a long time. Again, the creator-God attempts to create without foreknowledge – he has some image in his mind of what Adam is but doesn’t know, though he imitates it anyway. This is where Sophia’s strategy for correcting her error starts to take place – through Yaldabaoth’s mistake in creating humans. Sophia (the Mother) wanted to retrieve the power she had given to the chief Archon; she partitions the Mother-Father of the All. So he sent the whole decree of the Five Lights upon the place of the angels of the Chief Archon. They advised him that they should bring forth the power of the Mother. And they said to Yaldabaoth, blow into his face something of your spirit, and his body will rise, and he blew into his face the spirit, which is the power. [The inactive body of Adam so that the spirit left the spiritual realm because of his mistake will now be in Adam].
| And a voice came forth from the exalted Aeon – having the Man exist and the son of Man and the chief Archon Yaldabaoth heard it and thought the voice has come from his Mother. And he did not know from where it came. It did come from the perfect spiritual realm, [and this is part of the plan of tricking the thief] and he taught them the holy perfect Mother Father the complete foreknowledge – the image of the invisible one. Who is the Father of the all and through him, everything came into being the first Man. For he revealed his likeness in human form. [So there is a revelation to the creator God as part of the strategy of the perfect realm to get things back to normal. There is an image of the perfect man from heaven – the Adamas; Yaldabaoth catches a glimpse off] And the whole Aeon of the chief archon trembled and the foundation of the Abyss shook, and the waters which are above matter – the underside was illuminated by the appearance of his image which had been revealed. And he said through the authorities which attend him come let us create a Man according to the image of God into our likeness – that his image may become a light for us. [And low in behold we have a replication of that perfect emanation that was Adamas in the spiritual realm now being created. Partly because Aeons are actively trying to reverse the error that has taken place]. |
Yaldabaoth becomes jealous of Adam, and so do the rest of the Archons because it would seem Adam is Luminous and superior. For this reason, he rips out a rib from Adam and creates Eve. Eve then plays a role in the Spiritual realm. When Yaldabaoth takes out the Rib from Eve, who is personified as intelligent, Adam sees himself in his light form and confirms that he is from a place of light. Eve turns out to be life; she is Sophia in another form. Yaldabaoth mates with Eve and has offspring known as Canon and Abel – Yaldabaoth continues to have sexual relations with Eve. He produces through intercourse copies of the bodies and inspires them with his counterfeit spirit. And this is due to a creator, God, who is jealous.
| And the two Archons he sent over principalities that they might rule over the tomb, and when Adam recognized the likeness of his foreknowledge. He begot the likeness of the Son of Man. He called them Seth in the way of the race in the Aeons. Likewise, the mother also sent down her spirit, which is in her likeness and a copy of those who are on the Pleroma or Fullness. For she will prepare a dwelling plate for the Aeons, which will come down. And he made them drink the water of forgetfulness of the chief archon so that they might not know from where they came. Thus, the seed remains for a momment insisting so that when the spirit comes forth the holy Aeons. He may rise and heal him from the deficiency that whole Pleroma (Fullness) may again become holy and faultless. |
So it’s through Adam, and in this document, Seth plays a fundamental role – as the line of humanity that possesses the power that was breathed accidentally from Yaldabaoth that belongs in the spiritual realm. And it’s the Seths and the descendants of Seths who, through gaining knowledge, will be able to have the spiritual spark in them to return to the perfect spiritual realm. They’re also known as the immovable race of Seth that will return and be one with the realm. They also have different categories of humans mentioned in this section. They have Seth, like humans, but some don’t know and never come to know. They discuss beings bound by chains, cast down to prison, and consort with it until it’s liberated from forgetfulness and acquired knowledge. And in this becomes perfect and is saved – there is a whole idea that the Seths who recognize who they are whose souls return to fullness. Then, some forget, and they go to a place like Hades, where they wait until they might gain knowledge in the future. And Yaldabaoth, the chief Archon, repented for everything his cometh to be through him. He realized this whole thing was a sham and not working well. Adam turned out to be superior and more intelligent, the same intelligence Yaldabaoth tried to get out of Adam but couldn’t get it.
Therefore, the flood is a bad activity (or an evil act) on the creator’s part, God, which is different from the traditional interpretation, in which God is right to send the flood because evil has spread among humanity. In the Apocryphon (or Gnostic) version, the creator-God known as Yaldabaoth repented because he realized the other Aeons tricked him; realizing that his creation was all for naught, he sent the flood. However, the greatness of the light foreknowledge informed Noah; the Spiritual realm knows what’s going on and informs Noah. In Genesis, it’s God that tells Noah what to do. The author splits the figure into two; one: the creator sends the flood, and the other (Spiritual Realm) sends a warning to try to preserve the offspring of Seth so that it will preserve the power within the progeny of Seth through the generations of Noah – and so when the time of Christ comes via all this knowledge. The offspring of Seth will gain this knowledge and return and be on with the spiritual realm.
The source of evil is interpreted as a part of a plan from the creator God, who sends angels to take daughters of men and raise offspring. The first attempt did not succeed, so they gathered to create another. A similar plan of creating a counterfeit spirit that resembles the human spirit is to pollute human souls. These Archons mating with these women would put the counter spirit into some human beings’ bodies and souls. And the angels change themselves and their likeness to the likeness of daughter’s men and fill them with the spirit of darkness, which they have mixed for them and evil. So the source of evil is Yaldabaoth rulers trying to screw things up again.
This is opposed (or different) to the standard Christian telling of Genesis, of Angels, the sons of God descending to human women and mating with them, which occurs just before the flood. Another Judean author of contemporary times, 200 BC, Interpret angels coming down and breeding with humanity as the source of evil that leads to the flood. Some apocalyptic Judeans believed the source of evil in humanity that led God to send the flood was that angels came down and mated with humans and gave humans secret knowledge that they should not have revealed. These fallen angels developed into Satan and demons in the Judean and Christian apocalyptic thinking.
Act Three: Containing light creation in a simulation of infinite cosmology: Now, take what you just read, notably the creation of Adam, which can be archetypal and endless. Now, repackage it in the background of a hyperreal space simulation and simulacra. You get mythology that forces itself onto materialism not through valid interpretations of nature through science but through its antithesis, scientism, which gets imbued with the valid. And this makes both modes similar but ideologically different. It’s worth mentioning that science (or Alchemy as it once was known) would not have had its ascendancy if it weren’t for Catholicism. So it’s no surprise that any form of Christianity that views Christianity as an institution that’s in decline because of science is really by their doing.
The distinction between these two ideologies is that one promotes a hyperreal space theoretical hyperreal-space that is perceived as absolute and rational with varying hints of cosmological infinite certainties and uncertainties. The common understanding is to assume hyperreal space is real in a cosmological sense when, in reality, it’s incomprehensible in a material way. The other is archetypal, which can be interpreted through symbols and dreams. And this is natural and is also a quality given to us as a byproduct of the original light creation. That can harness that through the dream-like structure of the waters of the infinite collective unconscious – and its versions of certainties and uncertainties.
Both use imagination, although the striking difference is that one places imagination outside oneself and puts it inside a simulation. Having done that, it adopts the fictional modes to make something symmetrical work like something asymmetrical. And this is a simulation of archetypes to change the internal to the external. And this ambitious endeavour would take five centuries for it to work, and they succeeded. The other aspect is not because it’s that light or spark inherent in everyone. Thoughts and archetypes are internal, and they start within. As Gerald Massey says, thinking is, in essence, a process of “thinging,” since thoughts must rest on the nature of things. And things are themselves God’s thoughts in material form.
The concept of a hyperreal space is seen as a symbol, which is also a symbol of the imagination. There is a fundamental contention in this approach, which assumes that the false space simulation is real when it’s an illusion; being an illusion makes hyperreal-space as a stage no longer possible. In other words, space is merely a blank canvas, and you must not mistake the canvas for the stage, given what’s inside the stage has to be empirical, rational or real – and can only theorise anything outside that. Moreover, the canvas invites the imagination but has its foundation in a false reality. At the same time, it can be as real as anything else, given the final product of the canvas, which can now be a painting. The power of imagination is the power to create.
In parallel, Catholicism acts out Nietzsche’s notion of “God is dead” by re-painting the canvas with its hyperreal cosmological mambo jumbo, wiping out centuries of traditional knowledge, which kept technology stagnating for centuries. Perhaps it was purposely planned that way in fear that people in the eightieth century might sincerely wake up to the truth (the true spirit of Christianity). In fear of that, they embarked on a conspiracy to hide the truth. Catholicism’s paranoia doesn’t come from altruism but through the control of narratives. The fear was never really about God being dead, but through the revelation that ‘God is dead in so much as we don’t know about the structure of experience and reality. And can only grasp it with minimal articulation – this is what Nietzsche meant when he said, ‘God is dead.’
We’ve established the confusion of planes regarding the inability to pass 120,000 feet along with a horizontal line that stays at eye level. These are observable facts, not simulations. This cosmological wall is also signified in mind and is another confusion of the planes. The wall garners itself as the mind that must first adhere to empiricism and rationality – but only if it can explain the reduction before considering any other forms of spiritual structure that we are still to understand. This is clever reasoning; however, this form isn’t entirely immovable because empiricism can be incorrect if the structure of that reasoning is based on an illusion or a simulation, i.e. the hyperreal space. The confusion of the planes is to create an open world in which imagination is not bounded – but it gestates from a lie, so the cosmological stage is no longer possible. The confusion lies in pretending it’s an open system, while at the same time, managers of perception create a closed philosophy in the mind when, in reality, it’s open. Just imagine if they switched the focus. To not confuse the plane is to know that we can pass these walls in a spiritual sense.
Symbolism, alchemy, and astrology were once science’s discredited disciplines; the latter are reviving but are still predominately looked at with suspicion. Considering that we were making the basis for a hyperreal-space simulation, its suspicion is based on illusion – the illusion of astronomy. However, astrology’s symbolic theology is important – it helps explain the cosmic operation and its cosmic significance lies in understanding the twelve zodiac constellations and the thirty-six or more stellar configurations. Still, it must be set apart from astronomy and back to gnostic terms. The man was instructed to fashion his new body of spiritual glory “after the pattern of things in the heavens,” the heavenly or Zodiacal man. Man’s own small body is a replica of this body of God, made in its image and likeness.
Passing through the planes means understanding man’s two natures: the spiritual and the sensual, the divine and the human, the mortal and the immortal – the spirit (fire) and the water conjoined in a mutual relationship in the organic body of flesh. Says Heraclitus: “Man is a portion of cosmic fire, imprisoned in a body of earth and water.” Speaking of man, Plato affirms: “Through body, it is an animal; through intellect, it is a god.” To create man, God incarnated the fiery spiritual principle of his life in the watery confines of material bodies. That is the most accurate introductory description of man that anthropology can present. We are man akin to animals and also angelic or godlike in combination. Life is spiritually conceived and materially born. Or, man may be said to be born as a natural creature from spirit into matter and born later as a spiritual god when he emerges from his baptism in the water of the body and re-enters the bosom of his Father. Or, finally, he is born first as man, by water, and reborn later as God, by fire. (Kuhn, A, B, the Lost Light)
So we have the two states of man, the natural and spiritual bodies, which also have two states of matter that consist of the invisible and visible forms. The physical body houses the soul for regenerative purposes, one for death and one for rebirth. It must pass through darkness or incarnation, in which a new birth will rise or through resurrection on the opposite side of the cycle. A significant passage from the Book of the Dead recites: “Who cometh forth from the dusk, and whose birth is in the house of death”, referring to the incarnating soul. In a spiritual sense, the soul “dies” on entering the body in incarnation but has a new birth in it as it later resurrects from it. The body is, therefore, the house of his death and rebirth or the place of his crucifixion and resurrection. Fire can represent the spirit in man, which is a fragment of God’s indestructible, mighty spirit, this tiny spark of cosmic Intelligence and Love that we call the Mind of God. (Kuhn, A, B, the Lost Light)
So, the body of water is known as the house of death and rebirth; it is also symbolically linked or represented to the city of the sun, Heliopolis, in Egyptian, ANU. A city that once worshipped the rites of death, burial and resurrection of Osiris or Horus was enacted each year. NU is known as the mother heaven or abyss of nothingness, making A-nu a world of concrete actuality and substantial physical manifestation. A-nu is then the physical body of man on earth. The soul descends out of the waters of the NUN (none) abyss or space into its negative unity. To become positive, it must differentiate itself into duality. [Paraphrased from – lost light] – (Kuhn, A, B, the Lost Light)
Entropy soon kills biological matter, and so the body of man dies – although there is no real definitive notion of death, death is just a transition from state to state – a morphing of form to what is and cannot cease to be. The spirit is resurrected in the body of water; we can theoretically pass the cosmic wall in this spiritual state. The waters are also known as matter; all things are generated in the womb of primordial matter – the matter that is seen to exist in two states; these two states then become the mother of life at two different levels. These are known as two mothers (or two divine sisters) that the goddess and her sister represent. The primordial matter, the seas of empty space, is the first mother, and the second is the parent of the spiritual mind. The primordial matter is also known as the “abyss of the waters” in Genesis.
Earth is known as Tuat, known as physical matter or matter organic; it is a physical world that is not floating in Copernican space, but rather the only original organic body of substantial matter transfixed. The rest of the Logoi or celestial bodies are not indicative of a solar system – but rather dimensional planes of different orders from matter represented through their Celestial symbology and the Christos in man.
New-Age-Flat-Earth-Cults, inspired by The Matrix, believes in these two states adamantly, with a slight deviation. And that is, our bodies are like Avatars that must shed their mortal coil, which they will re-awake in their true body in Paradise – acknowledged with a goal to find the centre of it all and to plunge yourself into it. So, the concept is predicated on the spirit body resurrecting into another spirit body somewhere else; this is different from the spirit body resurrecting into spirit water. And this is far from the Etheric double concept laid out in Theosophy. This New-Age-Flat-Earth-Cult concept is essentially an inverse idea of Transhumanism, which raises contentions because it follows the same simulation propaganda of space travel. Considering that man and his body, and in this instance, the body is the planet – it can hyperreal space travel to another earth (lie) like planet – another body/planet for man to flourish. Which we know is a fictional telling to kidnap your imagination.
A more fitting assumption is that the body of man, which is matter, dies (and the soul is left to travel), and his other state, the spirit, is awakened again in the body of water. The spirit has a close relationship with the mind (the spirit/psyche), and the mind is a vehicle for thought; thought outside the mind is said to be housed somewhere else. This may be why the mind is being managed or guided by certain thinkers who deny intuition only to a point that suits them. [Research more]
Conservative intellectuals ask you to view the philosophical mind towards empiricism and rationality first and then any other modes. When those modes can’t determine an answer, you can look for answers in the unknown. And if you find the answers come from the unknown, they dispense with that unknown – and build a buffer between the known and unknown, so this buffer gets the credit. This buffer is the enclosed wall that acts as an intermediary between what is real and what is unknown. Still, it’s there to coax certain philosophical assumptions that they disagree with politically. It begs the question that the fire in which we speak, the light that was breathed into us, can be measured empirically; those modes cannot measure such endeavours because those modes are not the right fit. They make aware that no one is educated enough to discuss the psychological significance of the Biblical story, a notion mirrored among fundamentalist Christians – that no one is allowed to make theological assertions beyond their exclusive analysis.
Modern psychology loudly asserts that the failure of the mind to know the answers to life’s riddles breaks down its integrity and racks even the body. Philosophy, reduced now to tedious and jejune speculation, is the bread of life for which we starve. It was once a body of positive truth. To it, the mind could anchor. Only intelligence can save motivation from rank exuberance of eccentricity. Despoiled of the early truth, later ages have been in the position of a person trying to think without true premises. It is the function of science and philosophy to furnish the mind with true premises. The practical service of philosophy is the proper direction of effort. Its function is to furnish guiding intellectual light. (Kuhn, A, B, the Lost Light)
Intuition is denied in psychology and promoted through philosophy; psychology rarely thinks outside its norms or DSM manual. There is a bridge between the two; however, an open and closed wall of empiricism sits on the bridge; at least, there is an option for flexibility, but often regulated to philosophy. Intuition seeps into psychology, the psychosomatic and the acceptance of archetypes. The denial is a cause for concern here, a dehumanizing aspect towards highly narcissistic people. It’s a label that’s well deserved, as they make people’s lives a living hell – is labelling them non-human fair? – are we to claim they are without intuition or spirit? – Or are they just infants waiting to be struck by the light of transcendence, perhaps not in this lifetime, but the next? I’m not qualified to answer these questions, but only to make you aware of them.
If we are to hold science and philosophy as the beacon of light for which the mind can garner true insight or premise. We mustn’t forget that ‘man is a functioning god in the body of a human animal ‘(Kuhn, A, B, the Lost Light), relatable to other existing life and central to understanding the grander synchronistic whole. Its potential, however, appoints empiricism and rationality, which is fine until it semantically, veers off and adopts a simulated narrative. To something like scientism and fundamentalism are like ideologies that act like viruses. Flat Earth philosophy [if there is such a thing] shines a light on these simulated narratives – in pointing it out. However, it is met with the personage of naïve credulity and is the bearer of parody because its goal is too ambitious. And at the same time, it can be an innocuous matter. However, it challenges the Illuminati council that laid out cosmology and anthropology systems that are universally revered. The question is where the demarcation veered off and whether truth can reassemble itself from when it was cut.
The psychological significance of the Biblical story is that one needs a bridge for the mind to accept magic, but the contention is to convince you not to walk over that bridge. Religion’s real function was to be a place or a thing [explanation, articulation, definition, etc.] for man to understand the divine elements and to go beyond or transcend normal human capacity. And then be brought back down to earth from which he is naturally connected. These elements are the supernatural, the miraculous, and the magical. The supernatural permeates transcendence; the miraculous imbues cosmic love, and the magical is intuition.
[In no way do I declare I’m an expert in Biblical or historical myths. I just notice certain arguments being made that other authorities have already answered – also certain patterns, semiotics, and synchronicities that are always emerging]. Anyone who advocates for you to cease such attempts because you don’t qualify for theological study denies gnosis or knowledge. Gnosis itself has an intuitive aspect as it defines the natural aspect of the mind. Understanding that true knowledge is pre-symbolic is like saying you know things at one level without being able to speak what you know at another. So, thoughts (or gnosis) come from somewhere, and we can’t describe where empirically, but we can describe the process; let’s call this process intuition. In defining the process, it should be viewed as something external rather than bringing it back to the body; therefore, the mind is merely the receiver.
C.G Jung was instrumental in calling attention to the Nag-Hammadi library of Gnostic writings in the 1950s. He understood the importance of the psychological relevance of Gnostic insights. He considered them the virtual discoveries of ‘depth psychology’ …ancient Gnosis. Gnostic scriptures possess psychological relevance and applicability. For instance, the blind and arrogant creator-demiurge resembles the alienated human ego that has lost contact with the ontological Self.
Jung understood our reality: The primary function of intuition, he said, “is to transmit mere images or perceptions of relations and conditions which could not be transmitted by other means or only in very roundabout ways.” (Jung, G, C,). However, these are not mere images or perceptions. They are the fruit of our imaginations. And the roundabout way is the best way if reality permits. It will adopt imagination and reason with common sense and ethics in order to produce policies, products and theories, paintings, and music. (Saul, R, J). “Intuition seeks to discover possibilities in objective situations. It is also the instrument which, in the presence of a hopelessly blocked situation, works automatically towards the issue, which no other function could discover.” (Jung, G, C). So, it is the instrument of need and of limited time. (Saul, R, J).
There was a time when the birth of the arts reinforced the intuitive underpinnings of creativity over thousands of years. This artistic revolution has been around longer than the hyperreal-space-simulation. However, it’s more of a tool to convey an idea, as opposed to an idea that is conveyed to be falsely empirical. Perhaps this is due to a simulated education system bound to linearity. John Ralston Saul states; “Our education structures are obsessed with linear progress, and this is presented as function of knowledge, proof, understanding, and verifiable truth. Yet, how could anything so complete be reasonable, commonsensical, even rational? It is the approach which misses the non-linear nature of progress.” “While we have integrated intuition into our civilization in a self-evident manner, it remains technically excluded from how we run affairs.” (Saul, R, J,)
Parallel to Jung, Joseph Campbell also understood the Gnostics and what the Nag-Hammadi stood for on a mythical level. Joseph Campbell theorizes where you can go with mythology beyond the genre of mere scholarship by using myths to find meaning. You can take myths and interpret them in life; this is why you will find more truth in fiction than non-fiction.
Act Three: Adam; Horus; Jesus (Logos): The subjects focused on are always met with different interpretations, notably certain details on the same story. In other analyses of the same study, Sophia blew the spark into Adam, giving Adam its complete form. Although this thesis is based on the Apocryphon of John, which is a better fit, considering Sophia is also known as a trickster deity. She essentially tricked the creator God with the utility of voice (sound), which would create a perfect model of Man emerging from heaven. This perfect Man is modelled after the first Anthropos (or the first Adam), which is part of the Trinity, the one parent in the cosmic Pleroma. Yaldabaoth exists in the highest dimensional order of the material world (which is supernatural, a dimension with its own physical rules) and sees the model of supernal Man. In other words, a celestial cosmic firmament wall exists between Sophia and Yaldabaoth, in which the creator God is beneath.
He is essentially a celestial God in a virginal place filled with untapped matter ready to be conjured by thought and imagination. In the secret book of John, the creator God has three names: Yaltabaoth (Yaldabaoth), Saklas and Sammael. In his arrogance, he described himself as an originator: “I am God, and there is no other God beside me,” In hypostasis of the Archons describes his nature:
| “Opening his eyes he saw a vast quantity of matter without limit; and he became arrogant, saying, `It is I who am God, and there is none other apart from me.’ “When he said this, he sinned against the entirety. And a voice came forth from above the realm of absolute power, saying, `You are mistaken, Samael’ – which is, ‘god of the blind.’” |
In this analysis, we know Sophia had a hand in creating the cosmic wall, after which she places the Halfmaker inside or within it. Therefore, it’s easy to conclude she can also place a true celestial model of the Christos Man inside this cosmic plane. Sometimes described as a cosmic egg, and positioned in the sky for Yaldabaoth to see. With the help of other light deities from the spiritual realm, Sophia missioned this plan to trick the creator, God, because He was already creating Man using his intuition but was failing. And this opened an opportunity for repentance and salvation for Sophia. Still settled in arrogance, Yaldabaoth was assured that the voice and supernal image of Man was from his Mother, and in some sense it was; convinced in this, Yaldabaoth blew into Adam. And this is the prototype Man that he modelled, which in previous attempts failed to bring to life. Again, he blew into his face, but this time had the power of the Mother and the spark with it. The spark represents the spirit leaving the spiritual realm. To be placed into Adam as a gift for Man and repent for Sophia for the mistake she made.
In mentioning the perfect image of Man from heaven – the Adamas (thought thinking itself Christ) placed in the skies of heaven glowing with celestial light is such a potent image that it can beckon a deep-seated memory from the depths of the collective unconscious – imprinted as a biological truth.
So, we’ve established in some sense that a hyperreal-space cosmology, in general terms, is like a blank canvas for the imagination to prosper. But at the same time (the imagination) is managed by the many ideas that a hyperreal space is real. It’s a way of mitigating the infinite possibilities of truth. In some ways, it plays on the aspect of August Strindberg’s quote: “Kindly control your imagination …That is what makes men beasts” in the assumption that imagination can be organized and controlled. That somehow it can be troublesome and dangerous. Perhaps it can be those things in some sense, but only if it is viewed as something unquantifiable, deep within a pool of uncertainty, ready to strike at any given time. Watchmen’s doomsday clock springs to mind. The doomsday clock is a symbolic representation of uncertainty for nuclear annihilation. Throughout history, we must first imagine the idea of creating a monstrous weapon to stop a never-ending war. And through some means of the rational process, you keep imagining until it becomes a process of reimagining certain forms as you progress. Until, in a final moment, it comes to fruition, a weapon of mass destruction has emerged.
The creative process itself suggests imagination isn’t a means of destruction. Still, it’s the uncertainty for the reason that can make it so – however, it’s uncertainty amidst an intuitive swirl that makes these progresses possible. So, how does one recognize or reconcile this conundrum by simultaneously accepting that both are inclusive and inconclusive? The uncertainty merely reminds us that our imagination without context can decline into fantasy without other qualities. Imagination propels itself not through a mystical way but by the habit of imagining. If so, how does one explain imagination as a spiritual spark given to us as a gift? – If it is not through the mystical way. Is this another way of giving credit to the body and leaving the spiritual aspect behind? John Ralston Saul describes intuition as having two forms, active and passive, applied imagination and applied animism.
| Applied imagination is about acting on intuition, drawing up swirls of movement while also imagining the other, this swirl will mutate to one form and another, then you will be able conceive of your place within the whole. Applied animism is less about decision and action and about living in a larger reality, the synchronistic whole in which our lives are tied to great sweep of time and of people and place. | ||
| These two forms however can’t stand on their own, Deny the application of the imagination you deny the existence of a synchronistic timeless whole, even though the evidence of its existence is all around you. Intuition is one of our most practical qualities. Deny its function and you set yourself up for utilitarian mysticism and hero worship. Deny the animist and you deny both the roots of imagination and its application. In fact, you deny the very idea of swirling uncertainty as human strength. (Saul, R, J, n.d) |
Nothing is more poignant than the divine spark and its process through awakening; in this spiritual gnosis, it’s both applied animism and applied imagination. There are levels between the spiritualistic and materialistic. Non-spiritual (pneumatics) is ready for gnosis but not stepping through the door. Then there are the earthbound materialistic (hyletics) in nature; they can only recognize the physical reality. And then there is psyche (psychics); they often mistake the Demiurge for the True God. There is a distinction between applied animism and spiritual gnosis; one can be observed, and the other has to be felt; applied animism is a facet of spiritual gnosis. Spiritual gnosis goes beyond applied imagination.
As an adult with post-awakening natures, you would undoubtedly be aware of any simulated scenarios because of a strong intuitional feeling brought about by a spiritual awakening. For example, you looked at the sky while your crown chakra was in a state of love and bliss. Upon your eyes at the sky, you realize clouds manifested images you conveyed in thought. In a way, this is the synchronistic whole, applied animism with spiritual Gnosis.
There is a tendency to leap into romanticism concerning the creation-light myths, perceived as a superstition that hinders scientific progress. If such is the case, one would determine materialism as a low form of superstition, but given its paradox, materialism is dominant yet an enemy of applied animism. The simulation fantasy is to believe imagination and intuition allowed us to progress beyond where self-interest and materialism and the managers of the day were only happy to stay. It’s a one-sided point of view; both suggest self-interest and the burning desire to answer the question of who the Man in the sky is. Yes, we grew out of self-interest, built rockets and satellites, and watched and believed in the hyperreal notion of Man walking on the moon. We matured out of our self-structure, repressed our self-interest, and expressed our imagination and intuition, resulting in the invention of concepts outside our realm of possibility. However, the motive is not about maturing through self-interest because it needs a component. Memories taken are returned, indicating an archetypal myth that’s been around from the beginning. It would then be about balancing or layering out the self from the selfish ego nature with the mystical or animist side and resolving the shadow aspect of society and its conspiracies. That appears at disastrous events that indicate a manufactured tone purely for self-interest. The hyperreal notion of Man walking on the moon is Man’s way of answering the question when it’s unanswerable, so instead, they swapped the Man in the sky for a Man on the moon.
Adding components of conspiracy theory to the imagination of uncertainty alludes to a manufactured reason in the assertion that the military-industrial complex and its subsidiary NASA and their varied secret missions. All wars are banker wars but cannot be definitive given militarism, and warring nations are hallmarks of modern myths. This leads back to its primal reason that, with all these uncertainties and indeterminate conspiracy theories, such as secret space programs, manufactured wars and simulated conception of space races. That only reaffirms its failings but confirms their intuitive question and archetypal intrigue that a primeval space God must exist, and humanity must attempt to reach it. Once I realized there was no way to pass through this cosmic wall via a nuts-and-bolts approach, they approached this single endeavour differently in a multitude of ways. Besides them, it’s been played out before in history, a metafractal game that repeats itself throughout time.
Sophia’s mission to trick Yaldabaoth with the true image of the supernal Man is copied by the elite’s compulsion to lord over their fellow humans to be godlike. They test this resolve with the same trick. For example, by creating a holographic supernal, Jesus beamed in the sky through a project blue beam program to manipulate people into believing the second coming was coming. Other repeated incidents come from gene manipulations of humans run by corporations who worship Archons. Programs such as cloning, chimera tests, and alien-human hybrids are all for the purpose so a creator-God can gain access to the Pleroma through some cosmic loophole. The Man in the Sky and the holographic Jesus can parallel myth; their purpose, however, is vastly different – one aspect is so minuscule in its reasoning that it’s driven by a single idea while being agenda-driven for self-interest and the worship of the Demiurge. The other is cosmological, a remnant of the original light creation of Adam that is solely based on the Highest Supreme Adam.
Hyperreal space was once known as primeval space, and primeval space was once known as Nun or the Waters of the Nun. A familiar phrase from the Bible is “Joshua, Son of Nun,” and most know that Joshua is a variant name for Jesus; in other documents, it’s written as “Jesus, Son of Nun.” In the Hebrew alphabet, the letter “M” is called and spelled “Mem”, which means “water,” and “N” is called and spelled “Nun,” which means all things “Fish.” In this find, Jesus is described as the son of Pisces. In other comparative evidence, Horus is known as the Egyptian Christ, identical to the Jesus of the Gospels. [Paraphrased from Kuhn, A, B, the Lost Light]
According to theosophical study, there are four Adams, the first being the Highest or Supreme. The second is protoplastic androgyne, and the third is pre-terrestrial “or innocent,” a prototype of the fourth. The fourth is the terrestrial Adam of Genesis. They say Adam’s luminosity is dulled down everyone-quarter as its reflection passes through each succeeding Adam. Moreover, they conclude that Adam-Supreme is not the origin of all things. That title goes to the Cosmic Powers – the Creative Dhvan-Chonans, I suspect Yaldabaoth’s many emanations. Adam-Supreme is not viewed as their originator of lower worlds but as their transmitter of ancient yet ever-evolving powers-to-be. The Supreme Adam, the celestial Logos, the “Heavenly Man” evolved out of the Compound Unit [I gather the Trinity – the one parent] during a praylayic sleep – Adam became separate from the one. And Adam is neither male nor female. This transformation did not occur on Earth but from the spatial depths of the first differentiation of eternal root matter. [Paraphrased from – Secret Doctrine 1:246]. This is the supernal model of Christ’s Logos that imbues the material plane or the skies of material heaven that intrigued or, more precisely, the creator-God witnesses a cosmic revelation.
The Christos Man and its symbolic representation of the crucifix cross are undoubtedly archetypal dominances embedded in DNA, much like the subconscious making its way through to the conscious self, which, in its reasoning, gives those archetypes their articulation. And those archetypes are ancient memories long forgotten and now being unlocked. And this is made aware through the consciousness of dreams. Memory itself has become a real problem for reductionist philologists and genassists because it doesn’t explain why the body swaps out its material structure throughout a person’s lifetime but doesn’t do so for their neural DNA. This is established in fictional storytelling at which point a scene – a character in a higher spiritual calling scenario has to reaffirm to their friend or partner that it wasn’t a dream but a memory envisioned in a dream – this is a defining moment because it’s prophetic and so moves the narrative forward. The trick is identifying the correct articulated gnosis from that place we don’t know and not confusing it with what we do know.
Let’s say a person has two different dreams of the same archetype; one of those dreams/visions was a bioluminescent blue cross in the night sky, and the other was Jesus Christ portrayed in his most common imagery: white, blue eyes, and so on. One of these archetypal enunciations is that knowledge is out of sync with the dream. And the other is prophetic, given that the common image of Jesus Christ is a simulacrum or an imitation. For example, past images depicting the Messiah with dark skin – had been made new [less dark] to adhere to Anglo-Saxon sensibilities. Another component changed from a hanging man in a tree depicted in tarot and scripture to a man hanging on a crucifix cross. The Cross, in its most accurate meaning and its variance, the Ankh, is meant to signify good luck and good fortune. The word Christ comes from the word Christos (the anointed one) or Chrestos, a name used in reverence to Osiris. Chrestos can be traced back to Mithraism, which was around before Christianity. So, now we know the image (and the image alone) of Jesus Christ is a simulacrum; we can, therefore, identify what we know to what is out of synch in a dream.
In a time where these archetypal axioms are made clear, fundamentalists reciprocate in typical rigidity while holding validation in naïve certainties and literalism. The whole structure of Christian belief is laid out in idolatry given the built-in simulacrum – so people are duped into believing true knowledge when it’s misrepresented. Besides, any evidence for a historical Jesus seems non-existent; this further misaligns our dream, thereby bringing forth internal disassociation, which sickens the spirit. In this argument, some fundamentalists who have come to terms with their common sense can’t deny what other comparative religions have to say about Jesus Christ and its antecedent to other world saviours. In response, some fundamentalists now deny the image of Jesus Christ and firmly call him YAHUSHUA or, in short, YAHUAH, which means salvation. In clearing out its distinction, they also deny its significant astrological marker from December to September B.C. during the trumpet feast described in scripture. And this makes no sense, considering they acknowledge that YAHUAH is just another name for Joshua. However, it will not grant the same recognition for Joshua as Jesus, given that Joshua was the prototype name for Jesus; it’s like they’re almost there, but not completely. Were they hoping people might not realize this? Any attempt to relegate the saviour without his astrological significance to a person who just performed miracles [a far more accepted terminology than magic] leaves the saviour without his myths and potency.
In Gnostic theology, the Messiah’s role was to awaken the human soul to its true nature – a purely spiritual and intuitive view of Christ, as opposed to the orthodox view, which instils faith and obedience. Hope is offered through the salvation of the human soul from the fires of hell. Hope through faith in this veneration has somewhat the power to move the masses to their governing political ideologies.
A gnostic view or, more precisely, a focused view on intuition is met with speculation, especially regarding the view of Christ. The dismissal of intuition would be like denying one’s heart and power. Faith would have you exalt Jesus to unique magnificence as an external beacon as a way to look outside ourselves for the source of power and grace. As an effect of this cause, however, people inevitably ignore the divinity in every man’s heart, the spark, as it were.
The Zeitgeist documentary antagonized a lot of fundamentalist Christians; in doing so, they responded with a debunked version of the documentary, but it only resulted in someone else debunking their debunk. Some of them accepted that the Gospel narrative matched the archetypal narrative of other world saviours, but only to a certain point that “Joshua” must not flow back to Jesus. A group of YAHUAH followers believe more in the personal YAHUAH that is different from the image of Jesus. It only fits the same supposed evidence that matches traditional fundamentalist Christians’ absolute belief in a personal Jesus alongside the supposed evidence. Suppose the apostles’ testimony supported by archaeological findings is credible enough to conclude that historical Jesus did exist. This is fair enough; however, as I said before, it leaves the saviour without his potency, and you can’t have both. You either have a personal Jesus (stripped of his mythical potency), a man matched by other extraordinary men in history, or a Jesus interpolated into the spiritual drama.
Edgar Cayce, a proven clairvoyant, a person with high intuition, hinted at the idea that Christ and Jesus were separate entities. Cayce taught that Jesus and Christ are distinct entities: “Christ is not a man! Jesus was the man! Christ was the Messenger! Christ in all ages!” Jesus was a man who had been reincarnated as “Amilius, as Adam, as Melchizedek, as Zend, as Ur, as Asaph, as Jeshuah—Joseph—(Joshua) — Jesus. – Edgar Cayce. An important aspect of his assertion is that it absolves the previous problem. Moreover, it’s in his affirmation that Adam plays a part, reincarnated or not; Adam itself was modelled on the first Anthropos – the Son – thought thinking itself Christ (1st Adam). And these myths become timeless through the son/sun solar deity archetypes.
| Historical Solar Deities | Dionysus, Osiris, Sabazius, Tammuz, Adonis, Atys, Orpheus, Mithras, Zoroaster, Krishna, Bala-Rama, Vyasa, Buddha, Hercules, Sargon, Serpis, Horus, Marduk, Izdubar, Witoba, Apollonius of Tyana, and Yehoshua ben Pandira. | |
| Modern Solar – Superhero (Heru) Deities | Adam Warlock, Neo, Superman, Silver Surfer, Hancock, John Murdock (Dark City), Dr. Manhattan, Phoenix, Captain Marvel, Thor, Luke (Lucius) Skywalker, Leeloo, Wonder Women, Eric Draven (the Crow)and so on. |
Fundamentalist Christians refute these archetypal similarities and rationalize this opposing view on the contention that those archetypes just died and not returned (as in resurrected); most were rescued from annihilation. Rising saviours from multiple cultures seldom have much in common; Isis, Osiris, and Dionysus were just “good Daimons” elevated to the rank of gods. This is really about an inability to comprehend the difference between resurrection and reincarnation, and it all boils down to the incarnation process. Let’s say the cosmic resurrection aspect of Jesus is a hypothetical fractal simulation and simulacrum update of Horus. The true resurrection meaning would be akin to the myth found in the exegeses of the soul outlining the bridal chamber story – coupled with the two states of man with the added simulacrum update component, which makes a lot of sense. Those myths can be traced back to Egypt’s gods and their stellar cosmic play, of which Christianity is a by-product.
Osiris, Isis, and Dionysus are archetypal deities based on the Trinity, and the Trinity is embedded in biological creation itself. The distinction is specifically unique but only partially original. Each deity in the Trinity has made its journey to the nether earth. Osiris, the Father God, comes down to earth and gets cut to pieces by Sut (Satan) and the pieces of his body are scattered. Isis, the Mother, descends towards the earthward plane and retrieves all the fragments of Osiris’s body. Horus, the Son, also descends to earth, which parallels the Christian Jesus’ character as the bringer of peace. Jesus descends into hell (Apostles’ Creed); in comparison, Horus descends into Amenta, the dark underworld (our earth).
The Trinity is denied by fundamentalists because it’s not specifically mentioned in the Bible, and we know they follow a literal psychological path. And this only shows a lack of imagination intertwined with a lack of common sense – the inability to comprehend the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit as a Christian triune doctrine. Although in more precise terms, it’s just two out of the three as the Holy Spirit is the Son – there is a tautology of meaning, while the Mother is implicit, it’s still missing. Most ancient languages have a gender aspect to their dialect, and to the Greeks, the soul is feminine, which makes the Holy Spirit feminine. Being conceived in the sacred source meant it was androgynous – potentiality bathing in the primeval wholeness of undividedness. This is illustrated by the crucified image of Jesus in the cross Jesus, who is androgynous. Jesus is also represented as the divine Anthropos. The wise Man who has come from afar to rescue the sparks of life that have fallen into the darkness. Being of Wisdom, you can attribute this as a parallel to Sophia.
The resurrection from the dead aspect of Jesus’s resurrection is based on the Twin Angels left in heaven on our journey downward but resumed in the state of the union in the upward path. This myth is repeated in the story of the hymn of the robe/pearl. The idea is that the soul comes down and splits. The masculine remains in the spirit in fullness; the feminine part comes down. The notion of virginity was only meant to exemplify an untouched soul by any other external forces while she was still with the Father. She descends to the lower plane of existence and gets trapped in a body. The lack of fullness from which we suffer is metaphorically expressed in splitting apart from unity into two. The feminine comes into the world and is androgynous and feminine; the other remains in the higher world. The soul and the over-soul are also known as the divine Twin – and are known by many as the holy guardian angel and the Jungian self. This is the higher transcendental origin of the spiritual angel or the spiritual counterpart – the higher being that remained in the divine concealment – it stays in touch and makes contact. Wholeness comes about when the two come together; therefore, the soul’s plight is remedied when the higher aspect of life is reunited with it.
The dramatization of the Bridal Groom is the metaphorical spiritual essence of the exegesis of the soul. The soul will reject herself like a woman in labour who rages in the hour of delivery, but being female, she is powerless to beget a child altogether by herself. So the Father sends her twin. The bride-groom comes down to his pride. She renewed herself so she could be the bride. She adorns herself in the bridal chamber as she sits in waiting. She doesn’t remember what he looks like, so she dreams of him as to know. According to the Father, the bride-groom will come down to her in the Bridal Chamber, which was prepared for her. He decorated the bridal chamber, and since that marriage is not like a carnal marriage, those who have intercourse with one another will be satisfied with that. If it were a burden, they leave behind their physical desires and turn their faces from each other, but once they unite, they become a single life. The prophets said the first man and first woman would become a single flesh. For they were originally joined to one another when they were with the Father – this marriage will bring them back together again, and the soul is joined to her through love, her real master. And this is the union of the higher self, the Bridal Groom and the psyche or soul of the lower self.
Logos is a word, the logo is a symbol, and geometry is embedded in symbolism, which means numbers and mathematics. The first originating language of the universe, and when we break down numbers through ciphers and mirroring coupled with gematria, the numbers will lead back to PI (God), and what is the first number of PI … Three. Unlike the Word, which has room to change, mathematics cannot, given that it’s the first originating abstraction.
The Word is not the written Bible, nor the Logos; attempts to understand divine ideation are merely clarities of thought (intuition) trying to capture deific utterance on paper. Let’s not forget that these attempts at understanding have a reactionary component to mind and must be met cautiously. This cautionary tale of doubt parallels the magical Monastic warning; in Jung’s case, exploring symbolism turned him slightly mad towards his later years. Jung didn’t fully understand the Gnostic development of the self, the true integration of the soul – rather than the soul leaving the earth and going to fullness. Jung interpreted the Bride Groom as the self; the soul centred on the ego moves towards the ego rather than fullness. In this interpretation, the internal marriage that must take place is correct. Otherwise, it’s impossible to move to the ultimate Aeon. The contention lies within the union of the ego and self – that its objective is in itself and for itself. This little demarcation gave intellectuals and humanists a way to bring it back to the body but is merely a pre-requisite for the ultimate. That integration or individuation is like having a password that you can stay there once you have passed through the door.
Bridal Chamber’s premise is for preparation for the internal union or fulfilment of the union with the ultimate source. As she adorns herself, she remembers her disgrace from her other former widowed and adulterers; she turns her face in disregard of that. For reasons of admiration for her beloved, for now, in his presence, she weeps. In her devotion to the king, the real ward, she forgets the house of the earthly Father when things go badly for her. However, remember her Father who is in heaven, and the prophets said in the song, “Here my daughter and see and incline your ear for your people and your father’s house for the king has desired your duty and is your ward.” And this is the preparation, after which the Father delivers his son to the soul to unite with her. So they can be reunited or fused into one so they might ascend to the Father’s presence. Comparatively, this myth mimics the hymn of the robe/pearl story. When the son comes down to meet his twin, the Robe or the Pearl represents the other twin left in the higher world. When it comes back, the robe rushes toward the traveller, falls upon him, and covers him completely; it shivers and shines – and upon it can see the light of the holly gnosis. Something is left and then resumed upon return. The soul then moves of her own accord, and then she receives the divine nature from the Father for her rejuvenation so that she might be restored.
The specific uniqueness of Christ’s resurrection as a simulacrum update to purposely misalign the incarnation process and to incarnate and resurrect the Christos spirit twice; in the first approach, he is the incarnation of the spirit God, the sole epiphany of a deity on earth. The simulation is to deny any other higher evolutionary deific expression unless it was brought forth from infancy to maturity. And in return, the God lodged in the human psyche now has a paragon in the image of Jesus. And if you deny your spirit in the psyche, you deny it completely. You can see this in fundamentalists when they say they don’t believe in reincarnation but believe in resurrection instead. In the second approach, the final simulation updates to make the heru stand out from the crowd. Would then be crucified then be resurrected again to the same body. Such a spiritual miracle was only allowed for the Messiah and not for any other gods of resurrection because this semantic detail is specific to stand him apart. Fundamentalists not believing in reincarnation meant Adam’s children (humans/man) go to oblivion, but Christians or followers of Christ go to heaven.
Most Christians believe the pictured image of Jesus to be a true depiction; this is equal to believing there is a God with a white robe and beard who resides in the clouds in the sky. This pictured image or simulacrum, coupled with the historical Jesus, would be held as a supreme spiritual icon – who inspires the hearts of millions of devotees and, through his cosmic excellence, would work a miracle of uplift. Strangely, however, this only proves the effectiveness of psychology and has less to do with history itself. Psychology interlaced with ecclesiastical propaganda led to hysteria exemplified in the Crusades and the Inquisition.
Now that we have a paragon image of Jesus, humanity no longer needs to seek out its own inner divinity. To further reinforce this, he is made incomparable and unapproachable. The higher he is, the further the gulf between the ideal and the adorer. [To approach him, to match his purity, is to reduce his stature. He must be kept beyond compare, the ever-receding ideal. – Kuhn, A, B, the Lost Light] … [Ancient psychology of religion worked on a different principle. The motive to zeal was an ever-present possibility of attainment. Numbers of the sages were men who had gained the sunlit summit. They thought it not robbery to be equal with the god, for he was sent to call them into the mount of fellowship. – Kuhn, A, B, the Lost Light]
This unapproachable method of Jesus matches the modern intellectual elitist paradigm, meaning to understand the psychological significance of the Bible or the Logos – you must first have an excess amount of practical knowledge. You must have a sort of encyclopedia brain, and this is prevalent in all intellectual disciplines, from religion to esotericism. And this is a fallacy, given that the human brain’s capacity to hold memory as information is limited. Moreover, it’s more of an interior process (intuition) rather than biological storage of data – a process in which certain aspects of external stimuli work their way through the body. Religious insight makes us aware that those themes parallel other interior processes. A better way to motivate would be to design levels of education. For example, to understand the Logos doctrine, you must first understand the principles of Platonic theology, and then you can proceed onward. This endeavour, while practical, can get trapped in linearity. Even amongst those who glimpse knowledge through cliff notes and loaded synopses, intuition will fill in the gaps.
Act Three: The unbearable likeness of Eldarin (Alien) beings: Fundamentalist Flat Earth Christians tend to act as damage controllers for Traditional fundamentalist Christians, who always seem to convey a bigger conspiracy but are always pro-state and deeply heliocentric in their viewpoint. Their topographical viewpoint for the stage is entirely different, whether it’s a planet in one of the Galaxy’s arms or dimensional flat planes within a cosmic egg. It stands to reason that the common consensus of ideology among both groups is that you must be Christian. There is no real dispute about being Christian or Catholic; it’s fine for the most part as people live virtuous and normal lives; however, fundamentalism is always lurking behind Christian’s notion of the good and their faith.
These old and new movements got a new boost in the post-9/11 era. Then damage controllers Flat Earth Christians came about tangentially alongside that newly controlled apocalyptic rollout ofFlat Earth, which emerged around 2011. Other than being Heliocentric, traditional Christians, precisely the Theistic sect, are macro-evolutionists and hyperreal space believers, but only to assert that only God brought it to manifest. That is to say that if the universe had a beginning Vis a vee ‘The Big Bang Theory’ but had to have a supernatural designer behind it …God. Certain reasons for the existence of God through theism are explained through the borrowed concept of cosmological science, but contrary to its current belief of absolute, its science fiction.
The New Age Flat Earth Cults are doing the same for the group that came before them. This New Age group promoted humans to be ready for Ascension or Transition; in this respect, they can be viewed as adjacent followers of Zechariah Sitchin’s works. His works outline the differences in Human blood types throughout history that link back to Sumerians. I have a focused belief in the hyperreal-space gods that reside on a hidden planet [called X / Nibiru / Nine] with a massive solar rotation that nears Earth every 3600 years. The notions of space gods in a panspermia sense have well been debunked. However, a truth that is derived from the concept of fallen beings coming from above, but of a different order from that of a hyperreal space cosmology perspective (or alien Cargo Cult aspect) cannot be denied – as well as the importance of tracing human biology and history through blood types. According to scholars, the Genesis myth is an abridged version of the Sumerian creation story. They proclaim Genesis Six and Sitchin’s Anunnaki narratives make more sense.
Sitchin believed that the Anunnaki weren’t gods or emissaries of a god but space-faring extraterrestrials of incredibly advanced and infinitely old civilization – which came to Earth to mine for gold as it held the secrets of immortality – and in doing so, needed workers, so they commissioned their head scientist Enki and half-sister Ninhursag to create a genetically manipulated being as workers. Stemming from the combination of an already established being called Homo-habilis, they mixed their DNA with theirs and crafted a being called Adama (he of the red blood). Fast forward through our timeline, and humans are now established and flourishing. Enki, however, was attracted by human women and their form and would impregnate one of them – the offspring is speculated to be the first Cro-magnum being called Zia Zutra or Noah. This was an important revelation for the Anunnaki as this particular being manifested naturally instead of something created in a test tube. They theorized to be the first Homosapien in which the blood type is assumed to be RH negative, with fair skin and eyes that are blue.
This is where the concept of “kindly control your imagination …That is what makes men beasts” has merit because it’s without context, so it falls into fantasy. Biblically, we already have Noah and Methuselah living for 900 years; this is an abstraction that’s already difficult to comprehend. Why not add speculation of the imagination by claiming they know Noah’s blood type? There is a push to romanticize RH-negative blood types as alien while superior to other blood types. While the RH negative types can be or are indeed alien in many ways – the implication is the suggestion that all the lines of Seth from its origination to current modernity are RH negative. Currently, in contemporary times, the distinction is furthered through various exclusive components like their interests in the paranormal and having higher-than-average psychic abilities besides physical attributes such as an extra vertebra, low body temperature, and low blood pressure. And this all seems to be a weak argument in its reasoning – and to proclaim that these unique traits have validity to the suggestion that they must come from Seth’s line. This exclusive genetic marker can prove they belong to those ancestors, the first original children of light creation. Psychic abilities are not paramount to unique blood types but are equal to those who hear her call. The focus on blood is equally important to also focus on DNA and its Codons, as well as melanin; these are the factors with which supernatural powers can resonate.
The traits of fair skin, blue eyes and the RH negative blood component were some of the determining factors in concluding a superior race – are without parallel and confusion. And this component was used [at least on the surface] as a reason for a war with the world based on race. The Aryans race is not about a particular ethnic group; it was only meant to describe the fifth root race we are currently in. And this is a race that is firmly embedded in materiality, and we will be followed by two more Root Races, who will again become less material and more spiritual in substance. Eventually, we will reach the stage of Dhyan-Chohans.
In Anunnaki’s creation mythology, there were two simultaneous stories of the origin of human development, one in the Middle East and the other in Africa. There may be more that we don’t know about it. All were vying for the ultimate copy of the Man in the Sky to be contrived. The Genesis creation story of Man and how he came to exist was laid out in a few sentences, leaving out how the process of Man came to fruition – a vital component seemingly left out on purpose. Some fill this gap with presumptions about Darwin’s evolution. Sitchen and theosophist followers adhere to cosmological hyperrealism. They also believe in the wrong aspect of evolution. To gain merit among Freemasonic Heliocentrics, they are better off dispensing with it altogether. Either that or view it only as a symbolic representation of the imagination.
Sitchin’s narrative concept is creation myth stories repackaged to adhere to hyperreal cosmological rationalists. It pampers certain intellectual demographics who believe that after the post-alien intervention moment, existence had to proceed towards evolution and would have proceeded even without the intervention. Some of these assumptions are narrative-based, like the presumption Noah was RH negative in blood type; it’s an implied notion that treads on dangerous ground. It’s specific to conspiracy theorists that follow right-wing groups like Red Ice Radio – who promote guests that push for a conspiracy agenda, and that there is a program to reduce the population of white people through various means. The same radio podcasters that advocate holocaust deniers theory it’s either that or inability to differentiate certain particular events that may not follow supposed facts, but denying it whole seems inept.
I theorized that RH negatives are alien because they’re a remanence of past root races or the first few human development attempts on a downward path. Supernatural traits that are already embedded but out of sync with the rest of the population don’t make it superior; it makes it Archon-like. These unique abilities are not isolated to them. The rest of the population also has it to certain degrees. It’s just that most of the population has forgotten. In a sense, they’ve drunk the water of forgetfulness; a quality attributed to Man’s creation, and must regain it to uphold the natural mission of light. Is it no coincidence that this water of forgetfulness coincides with our DNA Codons being cut off? They call it junk DNA. Therefore, the original Man’s mission is to go through trials to regain those Amino Acids through human evolutional development and consciousness on an upward path.
It’s not about superiority through bloodlines but has more to do with the genetic disposition of having an innate fear of not being able to survive. This confusion is analogous to the internal struggle of society’s Pagan self and their civilized self (Christendom). Paganism is known to be seen in a negative light but was only really about nature. The civilized would rather manage than have a complementary animist relationship with it. The genetic disposition concerning fair skin is only relevant to not having a strong enough melanin (light receivers), a component needed to acquire evolutional growth. Hence, the supernatural component was already embedded. However, the downside was being too alien to integrate with the rest of the population – in retrospect, the darker the melanin, the stronger the receiver of light. Light in this perspective is both Man and his evolution process alongside a relationship with the source, which is called many things: nature / magnetic field / etheric plane / akashic records – which is natural and has no qualities or human notions of prejudice.
Currently, the fair skin aspect in the bloodline argument is so amorphous that data to differentiate cannot find its fixture as current estimates show that 85 per cent of Caucasians, 90 per cent of African Americans, and roughly 98 per cent of Asian Americans are RH positive those with normal blood types. This indicates RH negatives; those missing antigen proteins are somewhat common in other races. With a proclivity towards fair-skinned people, these numbers are correct given the Melanin argument. The least people with abnormal blood tend towards darker skin, but what is the discrepancy between African Americans and Asian Americans? Shouldn’t these numbers be reversed, given Asian Americans have lighter melanin? Conspiracy theory will fill in the blanks [or you can just watch the film ‘Get Out’]. There is also the logical assertion that’s implied that all white people must be RH negative, and given the data that only 15 per cent of Caucasians are Rh negative, it makes those implications null and void. It should also be mentioned that the highest group of RH-negative people reside in Basque, between Spain and France; these are groups of people who aren’t inherently white.
In Star Trek Enterprise, there was a two-part episode, “Demons” and “Terra Prime”, about a group of xenophobic terrorists attempting to derail a federation summit. Moreover, there was an underlying premise to the story: genetic compatibility between Vulcans and Humans. Vulcans are a hyperreal cosmic version of Midgard’s Elve beings – which represent Sky beings, described to live for centuries, and are keenly powerful and spiritual. Supposedly, these Elves were mythologized through the alien race Lang, an alien species that resides in far-off constellations. This is a reach and has no validity in reality except for the notion of Sky beings. In the Trek series, Vulcans and Humans have never outlined genetic discrepancies between the two beings. This is symbolized in the progeny of Spock, but in this particular series, there seems to be a suggestion of incompatibility.
Perhaps a subtle nod to the unique bloodline of RH-negative people represented through the green-blooded Vulcans. The episode centres on the cloned baby girl between two Starfleet officers, Tpal and Chip; the baby ultimately represents utopian progress, and the child’s name is Elizabeth. The child, however, is dying. Certain cloning techniques made the two DNAs incompatible for the child to survive (elevated white blood cells). Cleverly is described through the antagonist when he describes two halves of alien beings at war with each other.
A similar conflict arises with a pregnant RH-negative woman with a partner from an RH-positive person – although she produces antibodies in the blood that attack the baby. Her immune system sees the Rh positive as something hostile, commonly known as hemolytic anemia. Fortunately, thanks to medical science, there are ways around this: “Rh immune globulin is a blood product that is injected (via a muscle) into the mother and that prevents her body from developing the very type of antibodies that are designed to attack the fetus—providing, that is, she is not already sensitized to the Rh factor. If she isn’t, the chances are extremely high that the pregnancy will proceed in regular fashion and the fetus will develop into a normal, healthy baby.” [Nick Redfern, Bloodline of the Gods]
Given how superfluous and surface layer skin colour is – We have Pharrell Williams, an African American descendant, a cosmic egg resonator – a man who sees sounds, and a laser gun carrying, Milky Way master. Morphing one of his ears into an Eldarin being (elder beings / Elves)
Elder beings are similar in their symbolic suggestion or a parallel with Enochian angelic magic, which is about making contact with Angels. It began in early Christian traditions, with John Dee popularising the concept.
Most people kind of intuitively know they share their spirit with Elder spirits, and there doesn’t seem to be a conspiracy to it – and most of these Elder spirits, often having reptilian characteristics, are spirits that jump from host to host without the host knowing about it.
An example can be attained through the popularisation of selfies – given the population statistics – some might capture a picture of themselves with reptilian-like eyes, and further in their own paranormal, saving the image on their phone is denied somehow. Furthermore, these people are not excluded from abnormal blood types and skin colour. Eldarin [it could be fallen angel spirits also] spirits aren’t specific in their choice and are universal, but it’s not something to wish for.
Michael Keefe
… End of part 13 to be continued
