The God of the Machine will come Down to Save Us:
Deus X-President QAnon-achina: The whole QAnon phenomenon was bizarre because at the heart of it was more about unhealthy utilitarian mysticism and hero-worship. Trump, was essentially held up as a heroic saviour for right-extremists, as well as a political mouthpiece for the conservative groups. We can see the shadow side of romanticism and rationale methodology running amuck.
It astonishes me given how sophisticated Middle America is with conspiracy theory along with Ufology and the paranormal. And yet cannot distinguish this overt psychological operation that’s in front of them. Perhaps, radio stations like Coast-to-Coast and Alex-Jones became too structured. What was once edgy is now just ordinary. Meaning there are no allowances for people’s intuition to grow if the structure is devoid of reinvention. And within that structure, it must adhere to their program, and also, certain types of demographics. They have disguised themselves with a conspiracy theory/truth as their slogan. Speaking of slogans; Q’s slogan ‘Trust the Plan’ in its context promote the same kind of deficiency, but through a program of passivity.
Those radio stations for decades in more than a dozen times had guests discussing Cointelpro. And it didn’t occur to those that were duped in the QAnon phenomenon, that Cointelpro is where it all started. Cointelpro itself had its ascendancy in the late 60s and early 70s. Perhaps this is due to the anonymous ‘Q’ figure that came from the 4Chan site claiming to be an insider for the intelligence agency. Coming into the scene and merely expressing what they wanted to hear. Well, at least a certain type of that demographic. Trump was no more of a saviour than a plot device for the intelligence agencies.
Conspiracy theory, in essence, has a subliminal expression within it. To which it promotes narratives and within those narratives; asks the people to become a hero and to follow one’s hero journey for the truth. QAnon’s religious overtones [conversion] have the same kind of expression in that it asks to take the armour of God and fight against the Satanists. Notions of spiritual warfare have always been a Christian-fundamentalist thing. Q’s rhetoric: “the world is currently experiencing a covert war of biblical proportions, literally the fight for earth, between the forces of good and the forces of evil.” So, it would seem, if you are under the umbrella of conspiratorial truth, you are immune to psychological operations. When it is the so-called cover of truth is the operation.
For decades I have observed conspiracy theory subjects as well as the paranormal and other weird subjects. And would never think conspiracy theory that within its bubble and burst out to a broader consensus. Why did this program appeal so much to such groups as the far-right, conservative, republicans, fundamentalists, and religious-right and with such reverence. Perhaps it was how it was promoted and delivered. Q’s video’s structure is set up like a propaganda video, hitting all the right notes for fundamentalists and conspiracy-theory minded people. No longer does the documentary-style have sway, but propaganda video akin to a war-world-era is the go. There are no bases to indicate followers of religion are mentally ill. Perhaps followers of religions that have fundamentalist overtones might be so.
Q’s ongoing message: – They want you divided – They want race wars – They want class wars – They want religious and political wars. I think Mulder said it best; who are ‘They’? “At some point, you’re going have to explain who They are, you keep on referring to this omnipresence mysterious They – the given tensionality of random events or external explanations for psychological ones – but there is no They there.” In the context of Q ‘They’ represent the radical-left. And so, this is where one’s intuition comes to light. Where one should realize ‘They’ really represent not a political spectrum [radical-left] but an instigator, a bunch of wizards behind the curtain playing both sides of the political spectrum.
I have mentioned the simulacrum tactic of meta-morphing opposites and argued it’s natural and biological. So perhaps it was inevitable for political spectrums to reach an inverse point. The so-called radical-left is post-leftist-Rockafella-democrats acting as a pentimento to what true liberalism once was. Meaning you have to erase layers and layers of modern politics to reach it. And there is the argument that true liberalism may not exist anymore, and the spectrum is really one; right-wing. The debates become this weird argument against each other of the same political spectrum. Knowing very well those arguments are mere semantic theatre. And in this strange inversion, words and meaning become their opposite. Referent and reference are confused and with it the orders of abstraction. True liberalism no longer exists where it once stood against a police state, war, intelligence agencies because in a strange co-opt, liberalism favours those regimes. And those that are vocal about it are quickly labelled as alt-right or right-wing.
A possible reason for this labelling is to silence the vocal through an established referent where common knowledge is to identify the religious right as inherently violent and prejudice. And by falsely labelling those who are seemingly leftist and vocal to them is ingenious because that label has a dominant inherent state of consciousness. So, a vocal leftist is the same as a right-wing conspiracy theorist, ingenious it may be, yet these acts are false manifestations. They are intuition or intuition becoming passive. There is no counterbalance to other human qualities, especially that of actual intuition. Indicative of a secularist need to decompile conspiracy theory through a superstitious lens. It acts as an anti-virus if the virus is the truth. Materialism operates the same way. Such an aspect that is dominant in the guise of scientism is at its most superstitious form and is a barrier to real scientific progress. Conspiracy-theory in the eyes of secular, scientific-minded, and rational people seem to view it through a false label. In return opens it up for scapegoating, which makes possible truths having filtered through it useless. The other side of understanding is entirely different as it promotes passive intuition, more so, a neutered version of passive intuition, which is a distinct form of actual intuition.
And throughout history, materialism disconnected us from our souls and also ancestor worship. And with the ever-new concepts of the death of God, ancestor worship, of saints, spirits and so on, was replaced with Hero worship. And perhaps this is why the conservative groups raise Trump as savour, knowing he started as a Democrat. And believe without a doubt they have exclusivity for the truth even if it’s unfounded. Hero-worship can be religious and can often be more superstitious. A possible reason for this, which I have mentioned before, there is a psychotic need to forget, and superstition is a way to do that. Look at the racial violence in America between 1882 and 1968, where Black Americans were lynched. However, it was not as straightforward as that because the whole town [families with children] would gather to see the inhuman/ritual event.
Society back then was dependent on maintaining a view of itself as if such behaviour was normal. And the key to this normalization is through the heroic model, unrelated to the reality lived in. So, therefore, in modern times, Trump emerges as their Heroic icon in a time where the political landscape accepts conspiracy theory as part of its campaign. So, you have a group putting on the armour of God on a spiritual fight against these elite of evil Satanists who embark on ritual sacrifice and drink blood. At the same time knowingly/unknowingly just a half-century ago they viewed the same kind of Satanic Barbarism as normal; as a society. Akin to the Romans who gathered to view blood spilled in coliseums. And this is why there is an unconscious need to forget through superstition. You could argue they are not responsible for their ancestors, which is fine. The sins of the father should not be the sins of the son. However, to forget would also mean opening it back to classic racism once again. You could also argue this is a post-leftist endeavour, and they’re using a segment of the population inherent/unconscious guilt as a way to achieve their goal. Whatever that may be [and part of it is possibly to render passivity].
The Romans were predominately a genteel sort, and most frowned sporting events that showcased nudity in the athletes, on the other hand, can watch blood spilled for entertainment value. While this might seem shocking in today’s moral standard, it is similar to watching death and murder in today’s television and movies. However, the Romans were not offering mere entertainment, and the same could be argued for television. It was more about the relationship with mortality and the uncertainty it brings. In some aspects it plays on Evangelical Christianity’s stringent censorship on the secular world while having an unconditional faith for the soul. Although can it be that explicit? Since historical experiences have shown their actions as more of a struggle. The kinds of struggle that often lead into the corrupt side of cult groups, to which the inevitable chosen leader has the supposed light of grace.
Trump having the conspiracy theory minded voters of Middle America would mean adhering to their mindset. The result is always divisive. Is he a product of his narcissism, or is he just playing the part those certain types of voters wants from him? There is also a strange correlation between Q’s revealment and Trumps Conspiracy rhetoric. In a reaction, certain types of groups would manifest themselves in the offensive as a resistance for a president that wasn’t going to deliver in his promises anyways [both economically and in the conspiratorial-narrative] and certainly not what Q was promising. In this offensive, they proclaimed that he was an authoritative likened to Hitler. I can equate this to Rick and Morty where Morty kills FDR as he was a spider-like monster. And Rick says; you just killed FDR, to which Morty replies; but he was a monster though – then Rick says: don’t mythologise him he was a politician. The attempt to likened Trump to Hitler is unknowingly an attempt to mythologise him. Isn’t he already a saviour by the other group? A parody entailing FDR as a monster, but didn’t he stand up against the oligarchy of his time?
Unknowingly or it was on purpose that the counter group that would label Trump as the new Hitler by its nature is doing the same type of mythologizing but as a villain as opposed to a hero. By doing this, it will always have a narrative base result intermixed with truth and facts. The made-up Muslim villain in the post 9-11 era juxtaposed with ISIS, a mercenary army funded by the Clinton foundation at some corporation in Israel. And to the made-up legions of white supremacists [where their alt-right leaders are CIA agents] – juxtaposed with actual white supremacist groups. Perhaps these white-supremacist groups are not as overt like it was a half-century ago but are more insidious.
The watchmen sequel series started the story by acknowledging the Tulsa massacre. In previous posts, I described guilt pride [moral self-elevation through guilt admission]. Guilt inherited from previous generations is internalised. Paradoxically with this admittance, they have elevated themselves morally and can be proud by accepting such enormous guilt. The acceptance of guilt but also knowing it will never be paid off. Never the less other leaders and their countries recognising and apologising for their past atrocities – to the original Steward of its countries. And for them to accept it is also recognised. However, problematic countries such as the United States with its ideal structure of monolithic-nation-states can only really apologise in narrative form. And by having no real guilt admission it manifested itself in Woke [a combination of American individualistic liberalism and civil religion with a strong focus on identity
There is a conflict within the label and a conflict within the image, which at times is driven by a glamorization of that image. And can be further perpetuated when it’s related to pop-culture icons in regards to the depiction of the image (meta-morphing of opposites). As an example, Watchman’s notion of Minutemen a group of hooded heroes is a title borrowed from real-life Minutemen – an FBI funded extreme right-wing, anti-communist paramilitary organization. That targeted activist groups and the anti-war movements with violent acts.
To advance beyond racism one has to advance beyond race, this notion wasn’t helped by Sartre called ‘anti-racist racism’, as with the Black Power movement and its cognates. It is understandable that communities which suffer prejudice and abuse should shelter behind a protective assumed identity; but identities grow rigid and become a source of new pieties, new excuses to repay evil with evil – and thereby indirectly entrench the very idea that lies at the root of the problem. (A.C Grayling n.d)
All you have to realize is Q is an enabler of hidden prejudices for individuals that might not know of conspiracy-theory subjects. And it’s in your best interest to not get caught up in it. Guilt pride is not as important as one might think. All you have to remember is that our historical atrocities became entrapped in a historical pandora’s box because they’re part of the transfixed foundations of our psychology, both personal and societal. And what do these fearful dreams and unexpiated sin produce? Inexplicable contradictions between a society’s idea of itself and what it actually does. – J.R. Saul
Magento was Right; Trump was Wrong: Magento was right is an internet meme that describes a fictional X-men character Magneto. He posits a question; of whether his actions are right or wrong, his actions of counter-genocide/tyranny as opposed to Xavier’s pacifist approach. All of which is a reaction to humans wanting to wipe out mutant kind. All of this plays on the notion that Magneto is an allegory of the real-life persona of Malcolm X and Xavier as Luther King.
You could view conspiracy theory types as these mutants, but their mutation aligns more with lacking spirit and personality disorders, symptomatic of narcissism, solipsism, egoism, anti-social behaviour, etc. Although that would be an incorrect label considering those traits should be seen in a broader view. Considering such symptoms can be found in woke groups as well. Just for the sake of this analogy, the mutation is a far reach from what true spiritual gnosis/awakening is. Even Q’s slogan ‘the great awakening’ is misrepresented because awakening implies a spiritual component when all it is … are old sets of data being revealed through a new format. Q’s demographic and Trumps voters become these mutant minorities together with their heroes’ narrative and mythologising form a collective group. Which is in direct opposition to the [radical-left/post-leftist/ Rockefeller-republicans], which is technocratic, control big tech, universities and media.
Magneto is considered a mutant supremacist, a global terrorist warped by the Holocaust into an immovable hatred of the human condition. He is a product of his history and memory. X-men saga has always had the supposition of the Civil Rights Movement, which reshaped America by dismantling existing racial paradigms. And they gave their blood to do so. As a reaction to this, a Cointelpro initiated a program to disrupt the movement through assassinations. The same kind of disruptions was made apparent with Q [minus the assassinations] through propaganda, divide and rule politics that Trump was only too happy to capitulate.
Trump is no Magneto or even Xavier but is a hero figure. Regardless of Trump, any other person that would take his place and appeal to a conservative right ideal would ultimately be their hero figure. Trump became their candidate and the one to liberate God-fearing Christians from evil rulers through the absurd notion of a comic book hero arc. The last politician who tried to dip his toe against the Military-Industrial-Complex JFK was literally and figuratively shot down for it. The CIA and the Majestic12 with the secret service went against the presidents wishes to disclose information, not for the world, just for him. JFK’s proclamation only provoked the intelligence agencies fear. That information of [Alien life and its technologies] leaking to the Soviet Union. Then a conspiracy to assassinate him was initiated. And during the Trump and Hilary election, and aside from Hilary’s email leaks. She made a pronouncement on UFO disclosure and seemingly destroyed her chances of being the first female president. I mean it’s all pre-determined anyways. Regardless, people are willing to believe in a LARP that Trump and his Administration was going to overthrow a Kakistocracy [criminal class of governance].
Q and Trump played on the hearts of minds of a group that are inherently anti-liberal or anti-left in the first place. This has been a staple of the religious/political right and their Christendom, and fundamentalism in a more extreme sense. And Q’s Manichean other [and vice versa] Antifa; both groups have been set up for division. And to demonize each other if one should stray from their ideologue. Most of Q’Anon’s disclosure/propaganda content had already been around the conspiratorial zeitgeist sphere for the past two decades. There is nothing new there, and like Christian-fundamentalists consolidation of intellects and researchers as a tactic to discredit occultism. They have adopted the same method by accumulating all types of conspiracy theories. And instead of using it to discredit like aforementioned, it is instead used as a fuel to rally certain particular types of the masses.
In the end, it is a game. Trump was wrong, but so is his other. During his first election with the Clinton administration, evidence arose indicating they were responsible for the so-called Russia-gate. Conspiracies had been orchestrated and found untrue. People must recognise all these groups purposely create certain truths to meet their goals. Which suggest everything else can be composed, making it unreliable.
Worship the Fool and Play, Play: The word ‘played’ infer to play as a sort of game. And so politics can be a sort of game. A feudalistic game that keeps you in a dialectic state of mind, a false sense of democracy when deep down you know ‘democracy is mob rule’ (Thomas Jefferson). Trump was a Joker in the White House because the hero can only also be a fool. He is also a snake oil salesman (an Alex Jones archetype in a Presidency suit). The purpose of the joker or the Fool is to give the show away and to remind us that it is just a game. And yet keep the show going, while at the same time the joker periodically hides and shows himself.
When one understands the truth, what is the result of such gnosis or such an awakening? In this perspective, a new dimension is made clear. And in that revelation is the awareness that you were awake all along. The same is understood when we make an awakening a prerequisite for new types of consciousness – which is always exclusive when ordinary consciousness is practical enough [even if they are unaware or demoralised]. And this has something to do with the whole scheme of things because it can fit within the whole. Perhaps it’s a spiritual component that makes for better discernment, a component more indictive of light not faith. And without it were left to worship false idols.
| Worship, Play, Play Play and Worship, Play, Play. [- Chino Moreno] | ||
| You’re no Jesus Yeah, you’re no fucking Elvis. [ – Brandon Boyd] | ||
An atheistic concept of Religion misses the mark when it does not account for the non-proposition, or asserting [false] evidence for the proposition. Religion is more about wisdom than knowledge in the first place, and we can safely worship wisdom. Understood in the dancing and celebrating around the fire. Although at some point, we lost the depth of celebration, it became more about entertainment. In the context of right-wing Christendom blind faith for a political idol. In which all their hopes and genuineness have been all directed too, the same kind of hopes that match their blind critique of the one true saviour and religion.
Beware Monster and Forget your Own: Conspiracy theory reference of framing is narrow, making it difficult for the truth to reach its synthesis. It exists only to delegitimize possible truths. Secular people view Conspiracy-theory through bullet point procedures with the underlying premise that they are still wrong. [There is self-referentialism hiding in the assertion ‘they are still wrong’] even when the theory has been proven true, as a way to manage irrational reason. Conspiracy theory has become a loaded term, and has become synonymous with irrationality, paranoia, crazy, out of touch with reality. All a while having the political baggage and the label of right-wing nuts.
These are unwarranted labels because conspiracy thinking is more extensive, and align itself more with searching/knowing/finding the truth. It’s not that people are drawn to conspiracy theories because they have more facts. After all, facts are just building blocks to rationality. And also, astute enough to know reason cannot hold the truth to the cosmos. You can only grasp the potentiality of it as reason as thought. All of which can be verified when you realize what we hold as values for empiricism; [in the context of Satellization and any other false propositions] is simulated. Then reason as thought holds more value. And so, the non-rationale finds itself seeking the spirits which can be as reliable as pure reason. Conspiracy-theory does the same kind of thing; non-rational attitudes can be a good thing. Seeking the spirits is akin to opening your intuition and codifying it with your imagination.
Conspiracy theory groups are often obligated to religion, and some more so towards fundamentalism. They are outspoken about kakistocracy or an oligarchy. I feel there trying to engage with something so gigantic that they have detached themselves from a problem closer to home. This detachment or forgetfulness allowed something else to come up and show them how lacking it is. The Pandora’s Box of our historical psychology [racism as an example] is ever-looming and ever-present and ready to burst out at any time. A solution is to internalise such matters. If the notion of ‘get your house in order’ is to mean anything.
Why are people drawn to conspiracy theory more so for the populace of right-wing Christendom? Especially in regards to hero-worship and the inherent need to idolatrise a saviour figure into a political paragon. Such a notion is incongruent with their fundamental stance not to idolize graven images or idols. It could be something to do with how they process mythology especially concerning Biblical literature. In the last post, we discussed the Christ of Faith. The claim is that there has never been textual evidence for a personal Jesus and that creedal documents don’t count. A demoralising assertion to those who identify with their Christ of Faith and the immutable view on magic, usually through a fundamentalist understanding of the occult concerning curious arts is narrow. It doesn’t allow or encompass the nature of spirit.
From a historical standpoint, a belief in a moral Supreme Being preceded the development of magic, and at one point in history man turned away from the Supreme Being for the practice of magic. That’s one way of looking at it, but it could also be the practice of magic reinforced a belief in the Supreme Being, and the practice is a way of knowing or communing with that higher power. And once it was acknowledged, there was a race to harness, hide and control that power. To suggest man side-lined that Higher Power for its reverence is more in tuned with man’s psychological profile to impose a deluded messiah complex. This is inherent among secret societal elites with their psychopathic nature. And in tangent can be found in fundamentalism.
It’s difficult to see the hypocrisy when you hide behind the notion of the absolute; it’s not that New Age is attempting to change the image of Jesus because the Church has already done that. It’s closer to finding an understanding of the Christ of Faith. By changing the image of Jesus, it implies the New Age is using creative reasoning to find the inner self through the character of Jesus, but it’s more to do with creative intuition. It is by a conspiratorial notion the one many tentacle heads that want to separate fiction and fact. This creation of barriers destroys any inclusive idea of civilization. Which then destroy the idea of civilization as an integral part of the physical world. That would Result in the marginalization of our qualities. Normally people understand ‘fiction’ as something that is not factual and therefore not true, but is something ‘imagined’ therefore separated from reality. By defining reality this way, you pigeonhole imagination and deny intuition.
Whereas ‘non-fiction’ sees itself as the herald of facts, included in it the expression of reality and consequently the truth. However, it’s followed by a short shelf life because truth, like the Christ of faith, is malleable, for we are always learning all the time. Therefore, its expression of reality is an illusion. In other words, ‘non-fiction’ becomes unfashionable within a certain time, a decade or so. While ‘fiction’ remains fresh because it adapts itself to the place and period, at the same time conveying our principal source of understanding, therefore, lasting for centuries. The expression of the Bible follows a fictional aspect, often called ‘myth.’ We can assume the Gospel writers understood this, and therefore, the stories that came out of them became timeless. In other words, great fiction can be true for its time, as well as true for our time.
The Bible is timeless and ordinarily does not function like normal fictional stories, which makes it unique and difficult to define. Or perhaps it’s the people that use it as an absolute authority for how we should live our lives that gives it definition. Or they have simply taken the opposite qualities of fiction that of linear argument and fact and pasted it on as evidence even though it’s not written that way. Ironically, the Gospels that are timeless stories are used by people that generally deny intuition and are most likely demoralized. Maybe they realize that intuition is the only way to deliver truth timelessly. And so, they use those qualities that don’t exist within them to force interpretation in one way, making it a tool for totalitarianism. Northrop Frye describes literalism as “literal projection into the external world” this quote defined literalism – during a time when non-fiction had become more specialized in a way that is vulnerable to idolatry. Putting it in simple terms, the literal has always produced idolatry while the imaginative does not.
