Kabbalah Mysteries:
Traditional-Fundamentalists and their Nescient View on Kabbalah Mysteries: The Tree of Life comes from the Jewish mysticism (or spirituality) of Kabbalah. The Hebrew Bible is called Tanakh, with the first five books called the Torah; just like the Bible, it has hidden teachings, interpretations and revelations. The esoteric side of the Torah is passed down through the centuries orally; the tradition teaches meaning behind the written words (the inner Torah), contemplating aspects of God and the nature of man, as well as the truth about creation and other key questions of life.
Traditional fundamentalists believe the heart of Kabbalah teachings is centred on the quest to gain supernatural power: the belief that it’s possible for people to access the power of God and to use it to transform themselves and the world around them. And this is a generalization to encompass their central fundamentalist core belief that any hidden or mystery teachings are based on occultism, that the word occult itself is redefined to fit their fundamentalist perception, and that the occult is the doctrine of demons. The Ten Sefirot corresponds to the known characteristics of God or the Godhead, and God radiates to the world through emanations. The idea that the Ten Sefirot is used as a tool to transform themselves and the world around them – is slightly an inaccurate summary; the Ten Sefirot is just a symbol of a [cosmic map for the soul]. And this attempt to classify the Ten Sefirot with the prejudicial label of magic. The magic aspect is solely in the practical part of Kabbalah. And magic and religion go hand in hand with empire building and rituals that come with monarchs and head of state leaders.
What fundamentalists are referring to, and what they purposely leave out in their analysis (because fear garners more clicks), has more meaningful insight and can quash all their uncertainties is found in the Qlippoth [the Tree of Death]. The Qlippoth is an underworld of demons that exists below the tree of life and is ruled by Samael, the Kabbalistic equivalent of Satan from the Bible [given the last post, it might be the same character]. Occultists claim we have a soul copy of ourselves, often called the guardian angel, but there is also a guardian demon. Which takes residence in the tree of knowledge of good and evil; both spirits are called tutelary. Occult practice is about contact with your angels. It’s often described as the highest achievement in magic and is a necessary step to gaining mastery of magic itself. Which is designed by a series set of rituals that helps the spirits climb the tree of life, then you can contact the true you. After achieving unity, an increase in psyche abilities becomes apparent; this is true illumination. And can also be found in such practices as Yoga, which means unity, a similar principle of contact with the divine form. The process enables an increase in psyche and intellectual abilities called psyche development, also known as alchemy; initiations is another term used for spiritual development.
When it comes to magic, it’s always good to take traditional Christians’ warnings at heart because those who dabble in magic rarely come out of it unscathed. However, there is a distinction between those that actively pursue it and those that don’t. Those that don’t but happen to make contact without the active part – a natural quality brought about through the grace of the spirits – and to reach for it safely through the active side of the imagination and intuition. The active part has two main components: natural quality related to animism like shamanism, which was more like doctors [use plants and Homeopathy] with a deep engagement with the physical world rather than the spiritual; the spiritual is secondary. Witchcraft, like shamanism, also filled that sociological function. The second is about using magick through secret masonic organisations that gave each other initiation degrees as they moved up the ranks. Practical magic has never been about that or about wisdom traditions. The grimoire traditions, a modern middle-class English version of witchcraft, came about through a natural need or compulsion to engage with the spirit world.
The paranoia that came out of the United States regarding magic is a singular phenomenon, as well as modern paranoid Christian conspiracy groups who shout the wrong meaning of symbols to become symbolic rage while calling out repentance. It’s singular to the United States; it doesn’t match how Christianity in Easter or Western Churches works. You can’t do that in eastern orthodox, Anglican traditions or Catholic. The rituals of the Church were built by people who understood the typology of the Old Testament. And have read the Church Fathers. The pieces that are in it are specifically there for magical ritual reasons. So the singular phenomenon has caused much more damage to the synchronistic cultural whole.
The Kabbalah is a set of ancient Hebrew texts that describe a framework of the universe which also contains two Trees; the tree of life and the Qlippoth [the tree of knowledge of good and evil]. According to Kabbalistic laws, the universe is comprised of many dimensions. Each is called the Sefirot, where the energy that flows from the highest heaven slowly solidifies as it reaches each node until it arrives in the material world as matter. The road map for this descending energy is called the tree of life; beginning at Keter, the highest and purist and primal form of energy dimension is given shape and polarity as it descends to the physical world called Malkuth. Malkuth is at the very bottom of the tree of life; it’s the material universe where humanity resides. However, according to Kabbalah, the whole of human experience is not limited to the material world but includes the higher or heavenly realms.
Fundamentalist Evangelicals often generalized the occult as a whole and included in that is Kabbalah as a way to prop up their type of Christian religion; in doing so, passively advocating monotheism. But, on the other hand, if their intent is about principles to orient actions and perceptions towards a unifying ethic, a monotheistic ethical paradigm, on the idea that without it, society will fall into despair – then it’s fine.
However, that ethical pursuit is not by them; it’s like they’ve taken over the driver’s seat of that ethical pursuit. It’s an unconscious isolated form of ethics, when the driver’s seat is the State, and by all accounts, it’s the State that has [at least on the surface unified the many thousands of Christian denominations]. So worshippers of Evangelical religion think that the State is behind them and worship the State, but it’s the State that is using them. They’re the ones who believe they have the power to control understanding. Believers just support and do the work for them. And also, remember monotheism is really about Sun worship and praying fealty to a notion that was once Rome.
And there is a distancing factor; the monotheistic apparatus […] whatever that may be, but Christianity seems to be what is implied. As an apparatus to moderate the extremism of pure ethics by upholding that quality, let’s say Christianity, and then break it down to Evangelicalism. And when you hold the apparatus of Evangelicalism as quality before other qualities, it only accentuates differences between the many different Christian sects. The fundamental semantical differences come up. There is no major ethical difference between Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Confucianism, and Greek and Roman applied philosophy. And that’s because, at its core, the ethical imperative is goodness, conscience, reverence and knowledge. All in varying degrees have the same concepts to those religions; maybe it’s the inherited dysfunctions that are attributed to a particular title of that religion, and it doesn’t mean good is not in them. It’s just the kinds of baggage affiliated with that religion that’s difficult to accept.
And to think a monotheistic religion is separate from any forms of magic is a misconception. That unconscious isolated ethic allowed them to consolidate support from the Evangelical and Protestant populations. They supported all that neo-conservative post 9-11 reason for war and the whole new-Jerusalem thing. Their support was clearly brought about by sorcery and magic, but they’re blinded by the notion of the pure and exclusive Christian religion and other reasons. Having their support just gave way to a wider number of cult supporters. So, monotheism, secularism, atheism, and materialism are all religions.
All secular groups worship the hyperreal space brought about by lies and manipulation, and traditional Christians [Evangelicalism and Protestant] religion also worship it alongside their God. And this is important to know because the last parts of this thesis; explain why. Strangely, the monotheistic argument is strangely gnostic as well. The Mandean sect that arose out of Iraq always described itself as monotheistic. And it makes sense, considering there is a hierarchy of deities before reaching a unified Trinity, also called the One Parent or Alien God or True God. Monotheism cut off Kabbalah’s nodes of spirit and turned it into planets, bringing it down to materialism, which is open to atheistic and scientism’s [and satellized] suppositions. It needs to be reconciled if you’re upholding monotheism as a beacon for a unified ethic.
The misrepresentation of Kabbalah always, at times, fits their hypocritical and demoralized view of mystery teachings. They’ve noticed a similarity between psychic mediums (notably Cayce and Roberts) being in common with New Age teachings, which they deem false prophets. It’s a mistake to put labels on those who are seemingly spiritual researchers. It’s not about gaining supernatural power but knowledge and truth about the magical power of nature.
However, that’s not to say Elitists and their cabals of secret societies aren’t using these methods to gain knowledge, power, and control. And this is purely on the secret active side of initiations and magick, but it must also be discerned from those who are shamans and psychedelics researchers who are also on the active side. The contention lies in the fundamentalist assumption to always consolidate groups to occult magic(k) without distinguishing the truth. An example of this incoherent inference could be explained in light of the Flat Earth movement.
The traditional fundamentalist Christians believe that Kabbalah, along with the New Age movement, denies a personal God because they view God as a force that permeates all things, making God an impersonal force. This skewed reasoning is in its misunderstanding. For example, the goddess Nut representing the Starry Dome had to be held up, indicating forces working to keep this reality of our cosmos functioning. These forces are called Neters, which we call “natural.” We also call them the gods, the gods that we worship. However, worshipping gods is more indicative of worshipping through the gods and thus worshipping one God, that one God is the Trinity. Within this Trichotomy, it is still one God, a God of person and a God of form, a spiritual form.
When viewed this way, you are conscious of it, and so becomes a conscious ethic, and in a time where scientism’s world of material and planets are dying [or dead]. Then it’s a healthy monotheistic movement when your conscious of old gods are awakening but are symbolically transfixed in its position on a coaxial spiritual climb to the One-Parent. And not to mistake a God that is formless with white light, God’s effulgence – but behind the effulgence is a person with form and qualities, endless love, and so forth. So, the personality of God is not denied.
Kabbalah has more to do with Jewish mysticism that coincides with the scientific method intended to discover God’s nature and purpose and has less to do with religious or philosophical overtones. The philosophical side of the Torah is referred to as the “wisdom of the Torah” or the “hidden science” [Alchemy] in general. Hence, it’s known as Judaic Kabbalah or the secret Torah. There have been many opposing viewpoints when it comes to Kabbalah, and so mirrors commonality with the Pharisees and Sadducees of early Christian times.
The Elites and their knowledge of Kabbalah are just one of the many heads of a Hydra system of control. They use Kabbala to manipulate Matter one molecule at a time by applying subliminal messaging; taught by the old Cabal of the past through religious and intellectual institutions. Kabbalah kicked into high gear during the renascence at around 1000 a.d. where the push of intellectualism turned into a push of dominance and control. And this was led by the wise-men (Weissman) that eventually became known as the Hebrews. These groups were the Egyptians of centuries past, also known as the Israelites. These Israelites formed a portion of humanity that group would be used and manipulated by their leader rulers – the Hebrew nation was used to shed blood and destruction, all in the name of God. As the centuries slipped by, Kabbalism was passed onto the Christian Roman Catholic Church and the society of Jesuits; the Knights Templar also claimed this knowledge at around 1000 a.d.
Kabbalah is an ancient wisdom teaching that goes back to the time of Abraham in the eighteenth century BC, thirty-eight hundred years ago. Fundamentalists are sceptical about being traced back to Abraham due to a lack of historical or archaeological evidence, but this scrutiny can also be argued against Jesus. Abraham discovered godliness as an awareness of existence outside his reality. However, according to fundamentalists, he discovered godliness not through God that is transcendent and unknowable, as Kabbalists define it, but through a God that is transcendent only in the sense that He can exist in all dimensions. So, according to fundamentalists, He is omniscient, but not completely transcendent, only through dimensions. If God was entirely transcendent, which is what Kabbala defines as, it would mean accepting the notion of intuition and thereby accepting aspects of Kabbala, and they have a problem accepting that.
A fundamentalist skewed interpretation of the Kabbalist’s view of God being transcendent means God cannot know man and still be God. Or in the sense that He cannot be close to man and still be God, nor can humans know about Him, and even in this knowing, it’s subject to man’s perception and may not even be real. In other words, Man is not subject to enlightenment; only Jesus is. And for any other person who awakens, it’s merely subjective; this is a pervasive fundamentalist approach. Fundamentalist has also put a limitation on God without realizing it ‘he cannot be close to man and still be God; this Christian notion denies (or contradicts) His omniscience. The God of the Torah and the Bible identifies God as immanent (close to man). He was a loving Father, His cherished children of all ages. Therefore, the fundamentalist understanding of Kabballah’s view of transcendence is in conflict.
Within this argument, fundamentalists are convinced that this is not the historical God of Judaism nor the nature of God revealed in the Torah. But a reinterpretation of the God of the Bible can be traced back to the time of Alexander. And this is a clever way to suggest that the fundamentalist version of God in the Bible is separate or different from Judaism’s notion of God because of the mish-mash of mystical philosophies during the time of Alexander. Furthermore, it implies that the God of the Bible and its interpretation came first, but it’s the other way around. It’s within them to make the notion towards others for having spiritual acts, a cosmic consciousness like Abraham. It is entirely exclusive to their one and only messiah and is merely godlike. They ignore the fact that most of these messiah and prophet aspect would later become a potent aspect of the stars, and the wisdom that match those stars to their archetype.
Being influenced by the Greeks at the time is said to have played a role during the relocation of the Jews to Alexandria. Therefore, changing their view of God from something close to the man to something removed from man. And this is a clever way to denounce the intuitive act without really saying it. When it’s the fundamentalist that implies their close to God while at the same time denying intuition (Binah), you cannot be close to God without this component; being influenced is not factual but the inspiration for the imagination. Also, the intuitive act is inherent to magic as a whole; therefore, to human nature, fundamentalists are incapable of distinguishing or even understanding the notion of intuition; this philosophical and Tree of Life concept is something fundamentalists would like to do away with.
So, during this time when God was removed from man and became something of a Creative Force that is unknowable and unreachable, man needed to formulate a method of knowing Him. Fundamentalist wishes to assume that this notion was directly influenced by the philosophy of Plato and his doctrine of recollection, based on Socrates’ question: how can man ever learn what he does not know? So, for humans to reach the knowledge they need to learn, the mind needs to access divine knowledge already present within each human being – and this can be many things. Fundamentalists, however, like to focus on past lives, known as reincarnation, as a way to delegitimize it because they were taught resurrection instead. However, Egypt’s notion of resurrection (where the Christian concept of resurrection came from) had more to do with consciousness evolution; as one gets closer to divinity, it coincides with rapid biological change.
Fundamentalists believe scripture contradicts Kabbalah (even though the word never appears in the Bible, presumably, it answers to the core of Kabbalah) because it offers a solution to humanity’s problems through reunion with God. And they impose on other Christians to reject anything contrary to scripture because it is dangerous to the soul, and to them, Kabbalah qualifies. They also clarify to people not to take the entire biblical records as metaphors. This notion’s fallacy is by its polarity of taking scripture literally.
The fundamentalist refusal aspect is based on the reason Christ died to repair the hearts of man and mend humanity’s broken relationship with God. What the Roman Catholic Church had done and what fundamentalists like to promote is the notion of putting a doorman with a clipboard at Heaven’s entrance and institutionalizing guilt. It’s hard for some Christians to believe that no one stands between you and God. Furthermore, the door-man is akin to the light-bringer Lucifer, which is mentioned in the New Testament in Revelation 16: “I Jesus am the bright and Morning Star”; therefore, one can conclude its inevitable outcome. The Demonization of Lucifer is by its demoralization of religion; moreover, Lucifer has more to do with Light associations with atoms and particle-atoms inherent to thought (light energy, sounds and vibrations), another way of saying ‘light is thought.’
The past life notion, aka reincarnation, is part of the intuitive act, and intuition is something fundamentalists cannot grasp because it speaks to the heart of the unknown and imagination and confirms man as a co-creator. And this is what the time of Alexandria was about a melting pot of religions and philosophies. Whether Jewish scholars were influenced during that time is probable but not entirely confirmed. Fundamentalist wants to imply that Socrates, Plato, Pythagoras, the writings of Hermes Trismegistus, and the Gnosticism movement sullied God’s true nature as revealed in the Torah.
And this is not a valid distinction; Gnosticism as a movement implied a consolidative group when most of them were more pre-Christian movements, and at that time, they would never describe themselves as gnostic. There were many streams of ideas. For example, the Enochian groups with all the angels had their influence from Babylon. Greeks with the Promethean archetype and idea of humanity being the centre of the universe, the fallen world, Plato’s allegory, Socrates, Pythagoras and Zoroaster teachings, etc. All were unified through Paul and the gospel of John and peaked in the first century with Simon Magus, and in the second century, with the Sethians. You could argue Gnosticism came about through a sense of disillusionment that arose with the fall of Jerusalem and the Jewish diaspora into Egypt after the fall of the Temple. Christianity broke off from Judaism then Judaism reinvented itself, which often paralleled Christian ideas, namely apocalyptic ideas.
In that regard, matching modern fundamentalists and traditional Christian reactionary groups could explain a sympathetic alignment with Jewish Zionism. The Torah parallels the idea of a personal god; he is cosmic and also personal. The Gnostics didn’t differentiate from that idea but gave it more substance. It invokes the cosmology we recognise is gnostic while keeping alive the ritual and magical understanding of the stars.
The Hermetica was translated into Latin in Florence during the start of the renascence. Alexandria held the Hermetic collection of documents dating back to Egypt’s late period. It’s a mixture of Egyptian, middle-eastern and Greek philosophies at around 50 to 300 ad. Some believed it was wisdom records that survived the Biblical flood event. The documents outlined stars/sky to body/ground dualism, details about the microcosm of the body and macrocosm of the universe having fractal similarities. All were examined at a time depth of 30 000 years ago. It would mean those tablets uncovered in 1350 b.c would influence Biblical texts. Pico uncovered a parallel channel of primordial wisdom in Jewish theosophy or Kabbalah that explored Hermetic tradition. It would inspire post-medieval Europe, one focused on Hebraica and the other on Hermetica, the conjoined topic of Hebrew Hermetism. Did these works sully the true nature of God revealed in the Torah? Or did it inspire it? Considering the influence has been dated back to 30 000 years. Probably has to do with fundamentalists’ avocation not to take all biblical records as metaphors but by its implication is take some aspects of it too literally, and so 30 000 year time discrepancy has to fit into 6000 years.
Perhaps it’s just a means of arguing away the intuitive act by acknowledging it exists and then later sidelining it or ignoring it completely because the intuitive act can also be spiritual and gnostic. First-century Gnostic Valentinus progressed the Gnostic tradition, notably that of Hermes Trismegistus. Valentinus and his followers distinguished three classes of man, Hylics – Psychics – Pneumatics, or materialists – true believers – spiritual people. It was said that Adam received a spiritual germ sowed by Sophia stealthily into his soul so that the bone, his logic and heavenly soul are not empty but full of spiritual marrow. Thus Adam could beget three different types of man materialists: the irrational (to which Cain belonged), true believers that are rational and righteous, and the spiritual and intuitive people (types of men like Seth). It’s within fundamentalists’ and the church’s interest for Christians to only follows the way of the materialists and true believers.
Enlightenment is a spiritual act from the grace of God, and no notion of exclusivity, that of which such an act is only for one particular person, is not going to change that. Often this unintended supernatural power or enlightenment is different to that of groups (secret societies) with a fondness for the dark arts (Magick); it’s important to know the difference. And in those moments of the natural spiritual act(s) (brought about by practice; or the grace of God) that one heads towards truth, an affirmation of man as a co-creator is realised.
The notion of the “universe” and its abstract mysteries formed the heart of Gnosticism that endured throughout the centuries. G. Scholem interpreted Jewish literature with early Kabbalah, that of the book Bahir to fit ancient Gnosticism. For the first time in Jewish sources, God is theosophically described not merely as a heavenly king but with a Pleroma of hypostatized potencies and a cosmic tree as the totality of his powers. It’s within the fundamentalist opinion that these many conceptual ideas produced a symbolic and obscure interpretation along with writings of Greek philosopher Philo, that it would eventually form the foundation of Kabbalah.
I think it’s more about practices of comparative mythological ideas and philosophies that synchronise within a theosophical idea. The beginnings of Kabbalah came through traditionalist Jewish mysticism; if one is to view the origins of Christianity, certain parts of it will undoubtedly lead back to Egypt. And in that time, their notion of resurrection is different to that of traditional Christian’s view. Archaeology hasn’t determined or come up with the evidence to conclude Hebrew was living as slaves in Egypt or any evidence for their exodus.
The Old Testament covered links between the Pharaoh and Bible characters – intertwined facts with myths. For example, the Abraham character was based on Amenemhet, the Egyptian Pharaoh. The Hebrew people were a race of Asiatic class of workers who migrated into Egypt from neighbouring lands to find work as craftsmen and builders. As their population grew, they contributed to Egyptian technology, worshipped Egyptian gods and married into Egyptian notability – they violated Hebrew law to keep the secret from their fellow Hebrews while secretly ruling Egypt. The consolidation of myths and facts in the Bible was a deliberate set-up to confuse or hide the fact that the Egyptians and Hebrews shared the same royal bloodline. The Egyptian people wanted the Hebrew people out to rule, so they hid their identity and changed their name to Egyptian ones by intermarrying with royalty and, by doing so, gained Cabalistic knowledge.
A particular Flat-Earth group insists the Jews and (Zionism) are at the head of a hydra of control when it’s just one on many other heads. Its fallacy is in scapegoating this particular group because it would be inaccurate. No more different than fundamentalist Christians holding Satan entirely responsible for everything, and not to sound too spiritually pessimistic because to do so would also be incorrect, but having Satan to blame is shift-focusing on an icon, which leaves out human perpetrators.
The notion of Jewish peoples being God’s chosen peoples is said to be a fabrication and merely a chosen people propaganda perpetuated by the ruling class. The predecessors of ancient Babylon, Egypt and the Israelite nation was the Kabbalistic knowledge of the Cabal mindset – about the manipulation of Matter through thought forms. The disconnection of God was a means to perpetuate a deception to the people, but inherently still worshipped the God of the Jews despite the massive genocide of its name. Jewish people still practice Cabalism as part of their faith/religion; however, it’s not only among Jewish people where Kabbala/Cabalism/Qabalah (Sun-God, Light-worship) principles are applied. It’s in Christianity, Islam, and so forth, as well as Atheism.
It’s all about the State: Christian-fundamentalist is not flexible and makes no room for truth or faith other than their views, even if their arguments are proven wrong. A notion of an all-knowing yet unknowable impersonal God – a God far different from the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob is separate from its polytheistic history [monotheism is the hoax] can ever be entertained. And to speculate that men find symbolic commentaries into the mysteries instead of adhering to God’s factual, written Word is merely a way to stifle knowledge and intuition.
The fundamentalist platform “The Bible is the Word of God” is an abstract notion from the highest order and is difficult to fathom, or maybe not. Maybe it’s just a book containing God’s Word; then it’s simple. Belief in the literal infallibility of Scripture is not a real Christian fundamental. There is no evidence that the Bible itself ever makes any such claim. Therefore, one can conclude that it’s all about state worship and has nothing to do with God – or religion, for that matter. All religion is man-made, none of which was created by the creator, none represents him, and none of the holy books is an accurate account of the creator. Although, this way seems all too nihilistic and could be why there was a propensity to move towards the New Age. With the proclamation spiritual but not religious, it’s a strange remark because some New Agers also define themselves as Atheistic. How does one advocate the mechanics of spiritual and yet not believe in the G/god(s).
Fundamentalists are either agents of the state or just completely demoralized, and there is a high probability that you’ve met one. They often don’t understand that Religion has always been about anthropomorphizing state government. Fundamentalists hold the Bible as a book that originates with God and is adamant that the Old Testament should always be interpreted in the light of the New Testament and never the reverse. Furthermore, they don’t accept building any new theology within the New Testament by quoting Old Testament passages without a link to the New Testament.
This statement is evidence that they adhere to state power because it’s a particular fact the Roman Catholic Church is responsible for the New Testament reinterpretation. And this is evident in Romans 13:1-7, which is about to put it simply; that you are born into a slave system, so be a good slave and serve, and if you’re good, you might go to heaven, but you must also pay taxes to your government. Conspiracy crypto-crats have pointed out the falsity of the currency institution and that paying income tax is not in the constitution. In the beginning, the purpose of Christianity was to created slave system; the pre-text for serfdom and the Lords were delegated to rule as gods (kings as Christ on Earth).
Romans 13:1-7:
| 13 | Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. | ||
| 04 | For he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer. | ||
| 05 | Therefore one must be in subjection, not only to avoid God’s wrath but also for the sake of conscience. | ||
| 06 | For because of this you also pay taxes, for the authorities are ministers of God, attending to this very thing. | ||
| 07 | Pay to all what is owed to them: taxes to whom taxes are owed, revenue to whom revenue is owed, respect to whom respect is owed, honor to whom honor is owed. |
It can be understood in light of the Flat Earth Movement to further understand why this is the case. Traditional-fundamentalist-occult researchers like to think they’ve known from the start. Still, they argue as Scientism and Globalists do by perpetuating heliocentrism, a theoretical notion that Freemasons brought about as a brainwashing program mechanism. Traditional fundamentalists, like everyone else, are within that program. A great example comes from the old Christian vanguard Kent Hovind. He can’t understand new-fundamentalist-Christians notion of a Flat/Enclosed Earth, which is made evident by his fellow biblical peers that use biblical scripture to argue its merits. Traditional fundamentalists are probably too busy denying intuition and evolution [esoteric or scientific].
Not a God of the Galaxy, but a God of the Planes of Existences: Earlier in the post, we discussed traditional Christians [Evangelicalism] and their nescient view on Cabalism and occultism. By their implication, their monotheistic religion is pure and free from occult history, free from history altogether. It’s as if their sect came about miraculously; their arguments about the purity and tradition of a religion by its very structure are still secular, as the hyperreal notion of space also duped them.
Another contention lies in the understanding of God that relates to a hyperreal-space-notion; God of the Bible is transcendent in that He exists in all dimensions and has revealed himself as knowable. The God of the Torah and the entire Bible is immanent (close to man). He was a loving father to His cherished children throughout all the ages of mankind. The Scripture says God is not the God of dimension, but the cosmos and all of the dimensions. He is omnipresent. There is no real contention here other than minor details regarding the cosmos. Kabbalah acknowledges God is the God of dimensions, while Scripture adds, as well as the cosmos.
Space being a hyperreal-space cosmology bought about by the Freemasons, the cosmos is to mean the world, not a hyperreal space. However, not to dismiss the Ether as space, celestials (astrological planets) and stars beneath the sky exists. It’s the hyperreal cosmological aspect that seems all made up. New-fundamentalist-flat-earth Christians agree with this notion, although they seem to be doing damage control. It shows how much traditional fundamentalist Christians were duped (brainwashed). No amount of truth tested by scripture is going to change that.
The Kabbalist’s view of God being unknowable is not another skewed interpretation. The unknowable aspect concerns Ein Sof (meaning without end, or infinite) in this unknown; fundamentalists have interpreted Kabbala worshipping that ‘unknown’ as God itself hence the impersonal divine aspect. When it’s merely a notion of a divine force that inhabits everything upon creation – because of this, they think God cannot be described and has limitations and only intermingles with the universe through the channels of the Ten Sefirot. Magical aspect aside, this notion is absurd because anyone who has gone through a spiritual awakening knows it’s the opposite of a fundamentalist notion of limitations and inability to describe God.
Their argument stems from the belief that God is transcendent in that he exists in all dimensions and is omnipresent. He is an all-powerful being – the God of the galaxies. He can wield sufficient energy not only to resurrect all the corpses of the earth but to recreate a billion earths in any stage of development He chooses, simply by command. There is confusion in this rhetoric research as to which is the True God and their God; it’s relatively a consolidation of both. Perhaps to argue away a localized God and that their notion of God could be (given the evidence) the Demiurge (Jehovah), a creation bought about by the True God. Not to mention that a statement like “God of all the Galaxies” is beyond comprehension and seemingly the same viewpoint as Scientism (astrophysics) notions of a hyperreal space notion (like the big bang theory). Their fundamentalist nature requires them to be philosophically opposed. I guess not; mind you, this only comes from traditional fundamentalists.
At least scientism’s explanations, while hyperreal censors itself within a material framework, [even multiverses can be equated mathematically], but traditional fundamentalists are adamant that a God of Galaxies created it. Whether they like to admit it or not, this is Astro-gnostic or even Jack Kirby-esk. My intuition could never grasp a God of Galaxies in a hyperreal-space setting even before Flat-Earth was a thing. The notion of God only reinforces this hesitancy as a personal being in a literal sense. That’s because when it comes down to it, fundamentalists believe in a bearded Man in the clouds as their God, atheists see it as loopy, but it comes from a mythical base. And, of course, they won’t describe it that way because they believe they are working on an absolute framework. Since hyperreal space is not absolute, it puts a dent in their remarks of infallibility.
