Normal Behaviour in an Apocalyptic World:
Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – Artificial Intelligence & the Digital Law of Attraction: Continuing from the last sections of earlier posts on how technological restraint as a mode of action can help keep people in an equal setting or normal behaviour, it has its parallel with the New Age’s concept of the law of attraction, especially regarding the least desired and misunderstood aspects of the law of attraction, that this post will cover. In a previous post [Kant’s revsions], we discussed that it is not entirely that ‘thoughts’ within our collective physical existence bring about our holographic reality; something else outside these sense perceptions is being given to us. Regarding the law of attraction, it acts like a learning hologram, mimicking modes of mirrored reality.
People often get notions from new age thought regarding incarnation; if a person died in a horrible way or traumatic way, their vibration frequency would be erratic and traumatic and so attract that same energy when incarnating into the world again – by parents who have the same energy. The baby gets the raw deal as they grow up into a world not of their choosing.
Into something more tangible or within one’s control, the law partially reflects what is already inside. If someone is spiritually awake but is depressed and on a downward spiral, they will attract those types of energy; negative things in one’s life will appear furthering layers of negativity towards that downward spiral. Only when one considers something external in one’s unwanted reality does it match something inside oneself – that has the potential to spiritually recover the negative layers because we are conscious of it. However, it is more complicated, and it may not happen.
Those who practice the ‘law of attraction’ know all too well the complexities of this spiritual device and know it is not that simple. In its simplistic understanding, someone found a way to market the idea – and for a while, a popular book thread in the talk show host circuits outlining this new age theme – examined in ‘The Secret’. Its fallacy only affirms the incompleteness of its idea; the ‘law of attraction’ watered down as ‘the secret’ in qualitative terms mirrors a rational psychological concept called ‘confirmation bias.’ Somehow, this new-age idea evolved from bookshelves to an algorithmic social media component. It became the driving force for advertising companies.
This paring was bound to happen as most programmers in Silicon Valley are New Agers. There is also the very fact that there is a correlation between Cult group behaviour and their symptoms between New Age groups and start-up tech companies. Programmers created an A.I algorithm that mimics the natural aspects of the law of attraction but is mimicking ‘the secret’ inside a programmable universe that has no failure rate inside its universe but is still an incomplete idea outside of it. There is an error in the concept; therefore, there is an error [or probably not so much an error, but a bug] in the programming.
Former programmer Jarin Lanier said that humanity is subtly being manipulated by computer algorithms, which watch everything we constantly do and then send changes to our media feeds. These are calculated to adjust slightly to the liking of some unseen advertiser, and when compared to society as a whole, would only lead to darker times by this scheme in which everyone is under surveillance. Everyone is under this mild version of behaviour modification.
Its effect can skew one side of any balance of any subject concerning news, like politics on Television, where news as a whole is driven by people’s negative fears as opposed to news that always shows good things rather than bad ones, which no one would watch as negative energy correlates with higher TV ratings.
The difference between social media and mainstream [TV] media is that algorithms respond quickly, and the negative response tends to rise faster than the positive ones. So, things like building trust or feeling good often get overlooked because algorithms catch the negativity, amplify it and steer it towards an aggregate portion of negative people.
Who is talking about any popular political subject at the time – it is a very rapid measurement of human impulses instead of accumulated human behaviour – that can determine elections to which its media feed is driven by rancour and abuse?
The people who run tech companies like Google and Facebook are not the ones doing the manipulating. They are doing the addicting. Manipulating which rides on the back of addicting is the paying customers of such a company are not all bad influencers. They are just trying to promote their product. The difference between regular advertising and this new concept – is the constant feedback loop, so when one watches the television, the television is not watching the person; when one sees the billboard, the billboard is not seeing you. There is a separation or a cut-off point.
So this bug [or the effects of the programming itself] in the algorithm that amplifies negativity and steers towards an aggregate portion of negative people coincides with a similar effect of ‘the law of attraction’, notably about shifting blame. The new age emphasizes the good energies and does not know how to balance the negative. Understanding or knowing that the individual is part of creation – and the creation of reality itself does not necessarily mean the person has a clear understanding of wisdom or the philosophical intricacies of life. Often glorified in negative situations or events that may arise in groups or personally, and therefore, it must be one’s fault. The complexities must be understood; otherwise, it falls back to where the result must always be good; if anything else, it must be one’s fault.
When we know the law of attraction, we tell ourselves that if we correctly use our minds and emotions, anything unwanted should not happen. If it is happening, something inside us needs to be changed or healed immediately. Moreover, the unwanted circumstance will immediately change or disappear if we heal it. We resist what is happening if we judge it as an unwanted experience. It is that resistance to the circumstances that are causing us to suffer. In order to complete this complex spiritual paradox to fullness, new-agers borrow an idea from the Twin Angel story that conveys the spiritual essence of the exegesis of the soul.
By applying this wisdom [myth], the self becomes this conscious living humanoid incarnated into our holographic world, the temporal-self aware of their higher self that exists within the spiritual realm and is connected. Therefore, the law of attraction must apply to both points of attraction or perspective, the self and the higher self. Both constantly communicate with one another as the temporal self feeds information back to the higher self about things we want. The higher self then attracts anything that one desires to that person – then one’s temporal self becomes aware that anything one attracts to reality matches what one desires. However, there is a disconnection from that person’s higher self that distinguishes itself as a sort of language interpreter dysfunction. So, if one desires love, one’s higher self will give that person everything that does not love. The higher self’s metaphysical mechanism seems to give the opposite of what one seemingly desires.
The circumstances that our higher self is attracting are in perfect alignment with what we desire, and due to the higher self’s metaphysics being different, it may manifest a situation that our temporal self judges as bad or a mistake manifestation. The mistake is not in the higher self’s mechanism but in one’s judgment. It could just be that the higher self is manifesting exactly what that person wants, and to get to that place; one needs to accept or embrace the manifested situations [things] given to you. The pearl of great price motif; one must rummage through the shit to get to the pearl – the higher self became a point of attraction for that experience that we might judge as negative because it was going to be the venue through which the desire is going to be fulfilled. This wisdom myth is also what Karma is … as opposed to the commercial use of it.
The wisdom myth is now a method for the law of attraction. It is fitting considering how the left and right brain functions, and what we call morphing of opposites – the polarization of left and right duality is the central pillar of both sides of the Shekinah or the Tree of Life. Its venu is called the meta-control centre, which parallels this language dysfunction of the law of attraction. In a broader sense, it can be attributed to magic [in the enlightenment era, it can be described as modern early English middle-class witchcraft], except the method is different, say, from new age’s meditation and manifestation – the sets of tools used in chaos magic are sigils combined with language that is used.
The negative feedback loop in social media algorithms finds its parallel in the new age through external blame shifting. However, the new agers found a solution by reinterpreting their methodology. There is no technological equivalent for that solution in social media applications other than pure restraint or turning off the platform. However, the platform itself is not a danger because it follows a rudimentary aspect of the law of attraction – for example, when one searches for something in the search engine that something will appear on the home page of that person’s browser. And all relavent and related articles would emerge in the following days, alongside social media as product links or news articles. It is the type of subject that one searches for, so there is a choice; the venue for which the desire will be fulfilled will be through you – we become the placeholder for the higher self in conjunction with those algorithms.
Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – The law of Attraction is The Bridge; Theology comes Afterwards: I never understood why Atheists tend to lean towards the New Age spirituality; the New Age’s axiom’s spiritual but not religious may have something to do with it. When a published authority in atheism and a prominent New Atheist have an inkling of spiritual understanding, they have to contend with their personal ‘war’ on God and religion. It is compounded when one’s whole life amassed an occult of personality followers and convinced their followers that no such high power [God] exists. The New Age offers a way out, especially in Buddhism, since it is non-theistic and rejects the notion of the creator God. One is afforded the awakening state without acknowledging a creator-God. Apocalyptic end-time thinking is unheard of; they have “relative eschatology” instead of specific life cycles. “Buddhist eschatology” is an antithesis to ‘end days’ thinking as it promotes “beginning-less Samsara” as a never-ending cycle of birth and death with the samsara wheel.
The dawning realisation of the transcendent is disregarded from any concretisation because the spirit is not bounded by theology but through Zen infallibility, meditation and intuition rather than scripture. A normal non-believer [atheist] struck by the light of grace would say they were wrong and be given a choice. Everyone lives in non-propositional kinds of knowing emphasised by Plato: the procedural, the perspectival, and the participatory – an awakened New-Atheist intellect have nowhere else to go unless they retract their public doctrines and belief system to their followers. They are skipping the procedural and perspectival because they have given themselves no choice and are going straight to participatory. In this position, one cannot criticise them because one cannot conceptualise them or bring them down to earth; how do you bridge the gap between transcendence and particularise it without theology because theology is the bridge?
(Nu)-Atheism and protestant religion share this fallacy; atheism does not claim that there is no God. Rather, there is no evidence, or they need special or personal convincing. Protestants deny Apostolic Lineage, and therefore, God is revealed only in scripture and prayer, not tradition. It sets them back as all the magical aspects and history is stripped away, leaving a void in understanding and meaning. However, the law of attraction or sets of universal laws in general, alongside key moments of mythology, gave rise to biblical theology. It is an assumption to claim that the only way to individuate spiritual divinity is through theology itself.
Regarding deities [godheads, gods and spirits], when viewed as a non-religious model, it can still invoke a type of animist approach. Everything has a spirit, including the entire cosmic play, and the spirit is retained after types of destruction. The renascence magicians called down spirits from the stars or planets into different talismans, mirrored in tribal cultures that used talismans. In animist cultures, ‘yes’ there is an ultimate godhead or supreme being, but they have not been around for a while, and if they were around, how would they ever speak to us or discern what is going on? We are in a universe filled with spirits and beings with different levels of complexities above and below humans that we need to avoid or engage with. This level of approach will culminate in the birth of Zoroastrian gods and, later on, angels, demons, and aliens.
Perhaps theology is more about symbolic and mythical understanding; despite being seen this way, fundamentalists still have a lot of axe to grind. Surprisingly, some would advocate or lean towards New Age themes, at which point those themes get fishnetted into their rationality and hyperreal science jargon. In quantum understanding, our intention or observances interfere with the relationship of particles – it demonstrates the wave-particle duality of subatomic material; our observance determines particle behaviours. This is somewhat of a revelation for rationalists’ understanding as it found a way to define magical meaning within their worldview. However, magicians, hermaticists, alchemists, tribal gurus/witch-doctors, etc., already clearly understood this relationship with the universe.
The field of psychology itself was kickstarted by the same revelation that is new to Westerners but a staple mode of living and religiosity for Melania among animist cultures. A researcher named Mesmer developed the notion of Anima(l)-magnetism. This is what he called the cosmic force that all living beings have that could be channelled to a person’s body to promote healing. The power of belief would affect medical treatments in the form of a placebo. Charles Poyer [a Mesmer student] in 1836 visited America and inspired a guy named Quimby. Quimby cured Warren Felt Ivans and inspired Mary Baker Eddie – he opened a sanitarium for psychology, and Edie formed the Christian Science movement. Not long after, books on the many subjects associated with the law of attraction were published nationwide. However, aspects of Swedenborg and his ideas about the laws of attraction would be the underlining method that articulated these concepts in the New Thought movement.
So this fundamental problem in the law of attraction mirrored as negativity amplified in the online world in conjunction with shift/guilt blaming in real life also forms the basis of Biblical dualities. Swedenborg imparts his position on these matters by stating there is a law of attraction and that it functions as a deterministic factor in the spiritual world. He first synchronises the law of attraction with Biblical accordance:
Exodus 21:23,23,23
If harm is done, you shall give soul for soul, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, blow for blow.
Mathhew 7:12
Do nothing to another but what you want others to do to you
He says: These laws trace their origins to the universal law never changing and never-ending in the spiritual world that you should not do to others except as you want others to do to you. Such is the law of the spiritual world. People who do heartfelt good to another in that world receive the same good in return. So, people who do heartfelt evil to another receive the same evil in return. Heartfelt good carries its reward, and heartfelt evil carries its punishment. That is the source of heaven for the good and hell for the evil. –Swedenborg Secrets of Heaven
This early stage of psychology modelled the human mind through the conscious and unconscious mind. Communication with the unconscious mind was an accepted interpretation of a magical term. This was made apparent by Austin Spare, whose concepts became part of chaos and sigil magic. While psychology tends towards philosophy, as Jung steered it towards the meta-physics concerning the unconscious, it is still somewhat distinct from wisdom traditions [such as shaminsim]. It is more of a tool for people [that peaked in popularity in the Enlightenment era] who needed or had the compulsion to engage with the spirit world to optimize their lives. The seeking of this spiritual apotheosis in a magical worldview was fully realized upon its after-effect when spirits came to collect. By now, rationalist-materialist thinking has become dominant, and practical magic as a method has become fictional and fringe but remerged in the new age with science-like methods of interpretation enough to make people re-popularise such methods as meditation.
There is an apparent distinction between the new age’s higher self and magic’s communication with spirit, one being a twin spiritual aspect of the corporal self in the spirit world, the other communicating with spirits, angels or gods of old. Both, in a way, are attempting to reconcile awareness alongside manifesting individual needs. That reconciliation question is better suited for consciousness, especially regarding cultures new and old – and creation myths gave them a way to express that. Trying to reconcile consciousness or self-awareness within a conception of enlightenment experience or an awakening model – still needs to be answered.
Intellectuals had surmised that the ‘God is dead’ axiom perfectly fits a modern era that swapped religion with the worship of technology – embodied through scientism and technocracy that jump-started technology that paved the way for worshipping something synthetic rather than a God – a fascinating outlook on civilisations on the verge of collapse and an apocalyptic reveal. Assumes God was the underlying factor for proper behaviour for civilisation to function correctly, although most people never gave up on God. Moreover, some people still believe that Churches still exist.
The amendment of the law of attraction only reaffirms notions of morphing opposites of left and right brain functions and magic’s communication of the spirit. Furthermore, it can be conceptualised without a God, or rather, Polar thinking is enough. Polar thinking means one would not know they are right unless somebody else was wrong – we assume the right and the wrong are mutually exclusive, but when one is capable of polar thinking, one can see that they go together. It means people do not have to stay within their principles. The sacred can be answered in the secular; the eternal can be answered in the temporal; the abstract can be answered in the concrete, and so forth.
Christopher Hitchens says: If God is dead – is everything permitted? Where will our ethics be without a superintending deity? Again, this seems to be a profound insult to us in our very deepest nature and character. It is not the case I submit to you that we go about butchery and raping right now only because we are afraid of divine punishment or because we are looking for a divine reward. It is an extraordinarily insulting thing to say to people. We can have a better explanation in every sense – we have human solidarity. It demands that we look upon each other as brothers and sisters and forbid sinful activities. This is innate to us: those who are not innate, the sociopaths who do not understand the needs of anybody else but themselves, and the psychopaths who take pleasure in breaking these rules. We can only say it can be further explained by further research or have them restrained and disciplined. In no sense is religion a help here to morality or ethics. – Christopher Hitchens
As Hitchens puts the God is dead argument back in his Athiestic court-side, it is unrelatable to our current or modern situation. With a higher rate of UFO/UAP witnesses, spiritual experiences, awakenings and other experiences, as well as disclosures – his age of reason fell short in an era of truth and supernaturality. His faith in humanist quality has had less convention since woke-ism started to emerge from his tangent ideal, atheism, in the nu-atheist movement. In regards to Polar thinking, we take both arguments as having merit. Consider when we embed spiritual or magical technologies where engagement with the spirit world becomes apparent and genuine. This can be examined in the birth and manifestation of technology – through summing up spiritual rituals or alien contact alongside the plausible obtainment of UFO crash sites. This means the worship of technology is a delineated aspect of the worship of spirits as its position is related.
In regards to sociopaths, psychopaths and all the underlying mental disorders that Hitchen speaks of, he equates a humanist solidarity against troublesome people and groups. We also must not forget the function of the law of attraction or precisely its fundamental problem, which strangely mimics a symptom associated with borderline personality disorders, especially regarding abandonment issues. In their minds, to keep the relationship going amidst a possible break up – they act out those emotions that are opposite to good. These destructive emotions, at least in their minds, will keep the relationship going when all they are doing is driving them further apart. This language interpreter dysfunction found in the law of attraction correlates with symptoms of people with BPD. The underlying factor or the conention that stand out from the similarity is that the law of attraction’s strongest frequency is authenticity, and we can differentiate authentic people from the fake ones.
Theology becomes irrelevant when we genuinely try to grasp the transcendental universe; ideas such as religion and all its iconography symbols and ideas are like layers of material that we must peel away or let go. They exist only to be constructively broken; if enlightenment came in the box, we break the box into pieces to get it. When one abandons all belief altogether, they abandon every sort of way of hanging on to life – we accept our complete impermanence, the prospect of our death and the vanishing into nothing and letting go of control. Thus, we are at the mercy of others other than ourselves – and we let go of that. This means letting go of any God to this entirely – so this complete let go flips, and one discovers having made it. A new way of experiencing altogether in which one does not need any God because you are it – also, one does not cling to the idea of it. This is why a belief in God reflects a lack of Faith, and that is because Faith would mean a total let-go.
Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – Let’s Bridge the Gap a Bit: The Gnostics were an early sect of Christianity, and the Valentinian Gnostics were the number one problem of the Church at the beginning of the second century. Their problem was mainly caused by followers of Valentines, who were the early Christians who followed Saint Paul and Jesus’ teachings. Moreover, they understood John 8, which ascribed a setting up of a society separate from the Jewish authorities, and that this religion was about divine sovereignty and the personal gnosis that’s delivered to you one-on-one via the Holy Spirit by god, and this is what Ephesians is about.
People with twin identities obscure much of this interesting aspect of Gnostic history [but look visually different in the Superman or Clark sense – out in the open] who act as online spokespersons and educators who can amass a cult following. They simultaneously promote a quasi-Gnostic and anti-Gnostic approach that is interlaced with truths and propaganda. Eastern-orthodox online symbolic-pastor-agents are culprits here. These people who play multiple roles are now dominant within independent media [social media].
These guys are graduating from the prototypical coded death hoax [Hiram Abiff’s] University of master mason. Symbolically, Hiram Abiff is the Temple, and Humanity is the Temple – Hiram Abiff codes a crucifixion or death and resurrection, and his story, myth and iconography an analogous or symbolic story that tells us about the realisation of the illusory nature of this world. A symbolic death and return allows one to be reborn with an awareness of the Atman or Christ-consciousness.
It differs from the conspiratorial notions or theories about celebrities that have died and merely went underground or moved to South America – not to mention all the different factors involved, mainly because doppelgangers exist. People are bound to look similar to one another. Celebrities are known to use body doubles. It does convey a hoax within a hoax, a fractal conspiracy that doubles itself if needed – for example, not only did Epstein die of suicide as we were led to believe, but ritually murdered – now the murder ritual murder itself is a hoax, and that he changed his identity and now lives in South America somewhere. Believe what you want – I believe he died.
Unfortunately, this ritual is sometimes played out for real [often with actors and singers], the last one being significant regarding the inverted cross. Is grunge rock’s frontman Chris Cornell who is the parallel consort of the Siren’s [Sybill] Jeff Buckley. His autopsy took 12 hours between him hanging himself [allegedly] and being printed in the headlines (that does not happen). Some believe the suicide news story, and some are convinced about his drug use and depression. Personally, I do not. The core of all Religion and Mystery Cults [Schools] is the death/rebirth ritual. The cultivated fake death experience is symbolically grafted into Chris Cornell’s real death ritual. So any other fake death hoax that comes after it – becomes about graduating [or going through the fake death experience] from Chris Cornell’s/Temple University as you die [in his track ‘just like suicide’] and enter the ‘black hole sun.’
There is only one genuine path out of a Satanic/Demiruge sense of worship that had been semantically born out of history interlocked with its gods and symbology but reconstituted as monolatrism in the present – that is slowly remoulding itself in a digital landscape. It hides in pop culture but also in Religion, including Eastern Orthodox Christianity and other mainstream Churches that prey frailty to Jewish religious sensibilities. In the New Testament, John 8:44 mentions they worship the Devil (in this regard, the Devil being a type of Demirgue).
Anthony Pageau is one of those individuals who prey frailty to these types of worship; he starts by equating Gnosis with a type of divine sexual union. There is no language either in Greek or anywhere else in the New Testament that Gnosis has been equated with sexual union (and entirely in the realm of magic and myth found in Enoch). Scholars and academics are clear on this – the sexual union aspect comes from a Kabalistic thought that divinity with God can be derived from sexual union. Eastern-orthodox Christianity spokesperson Anthony Pageau would have you believe in this union notion by promoting a semantic similarity; he says: “That is why in Christianity we have this incarnation vision of the world – Christ is incarnate, he is the total joining of divinity and humanity– that is what gnosis is in the Christian tradition.” You may think the utility is more metaphorical, but impart Jesus as a sort of Nephilim outcome, and is what Pageau wants you to believe. He later says: “The Gnostics tended to the view gnosis in the Platonic sense – moving out of the cave – the world of manifestation is an illusion – you must transcend the manifestation – so you see the principles for yourself. The gnostic Christians, especially the Valintanians, know that Yahweh of the Old Testament is like a Demiruige tyrant – he is not the Father of Christ. Christ says so in canonical scripture – Gnostics follow Christ/Sophia, and Christians back then and presently are chained to Judaism W/ Twine.
Anthony Pageau (a quasi-Gnostic), also known as James Poulos (an anti-Gnostic), is the same person playing two personas as gatekeepers (inside your independent social media). Pageau is a symbologist involved in enchanting and reinterpreting myths, including Christian myths that also represent the Eastern Orthodox. Wants people to climb the mountain metaphorically? When we talk about climbing the mountain, it is really about describing the ascension to the stars or higher planes of existence, and the symbolic iconography for that is Jacob’s ladder. This, in conjunction with the attainment of spirit or enlightenment or higher states of consciousness – as mountains also means people who possess the goodness of love since angels dwell upon a mountain.
Pageau, preoccupied with notions of hierarchies, like his friend Jordan Peterson, uses the mountain as an image to convey a process in which climbing a mountain is like climbing a hierarchy of principality. He says: ascending the mountain, going up the ladder, moving towards the divine darkness, and removing the garments of skin. For them, the gnosis exit door does not exist, and upon removing the garments of the skin or when the veil of life is lifted or when one dies, we will reach that mountain, and then one goes back down as one recovers what was removed.
There is a reptilian take on this incarnation process (garments of skin or shedding skin) as well as adopting a Jewish idea in the pattern of the Tabernacle, which is the rep-tile of the mosaics (the Moses who loses). Moreover, upon the great reset of their time (when the Roman Empire wiped out Christian Gnostics and rewrote parts of scripture), Moses was said to enter the divine darkness, which is not in scripture, upon creating their laws and interpretations and having wiped out most of the gnostics, and deliberate spread of propaganda or stories about them that seemed hanas and vulgar. However, knowing all too well that those horrible stories were confessions about themselves, feeling empty inside, and are filled with spirits of all the white Allah-bastards (the unforgiven) stuck in the hall of shame with their heads cut off.
Technically, Gnosticism never existed. The actual paradigm is that Christianity was Gnostic, Christ was a Gnosis teacher, and so was Paul. The Roman Empire started throwing stones with Peter or Petra the rock, so they built a Church on that, and that is why Saint Peter’s Cross is upside down. The upside-down cross is synchronistically or at least on a semiotic level of interest regarding Hiram Abiff’s University of master mason with Chris Cornell as the last Chris(t) of significance. We have Chris[t] Cornell’s ‘Down on the Upside’ in a Pretty Noose’or the ‘Jesus Christ Pose’
- We have Pageau with Twin identities discussing Christ as part of a divine union, along with Moses entering divine darkness, inverting Gnosticism and what scripture is.
- Pageau’s Twin’s initials are J.P., the same initials as his friend Jordan Peterson – Pageau is also a carver and makes a Pepe Hat for Jordan (welcoming him to the Club).
- The Twin idea comes from the New Age’s problem of explaining away the fundamental problem of the Law of Attraction – by claiming there is the self in our 3d reality and a higher self in the spiritual dimensions, which is a concept borrowed from the exegesis of the soul and the principles of hermeticism as above and as below.
- The concept of law attraction found its way into A.I. algorithms and internet Coding, minus it a fundamental problem [because it is impossible to code spiritual dimensional uncertainty] – In hopes it can birth an A.I. Egrgore or an Arhiman/Lucifer archetypal being in the real world for transhumanism agenda.
- Regarding Moses: A conflict of interest arises inside the Christian religion, knowing that their orthodox God killed Moses in the mountain and his spirit is doomed to roam the earth. Truthfully, interpretations are kept secret.
- The name Moses is also a song title by the Cocteau Twins (twins being the incidental parallel) in which the Chorus lyrics are “moonchild.”
- This is also Chris(t) Cornell’s song title and chorus of the same name, “Moonchild”, which follows the same lyrical pattern of melodic rhythm. The Moon is the first heavenly bridge for the Soul.
Pageau claims that Christ manifests the fullness of the hierarchy where he is at the top of the hierarchy and bottom of the hierarchy at the same time. However, as we know … Jesus teaches us to be in the world but not of it, and he tells us that he is the light and the way, and He will bring us to a kingdom different from this three-dimensional simulacrum dream. They are instigating a suggestive thought that there is no bridge to the upper Pleroma, and we are better off heading back down. Moreover, the only bridge found is in their theology while ignoring universal laws.
Related to symbolic interpretations, when juxtaposed, one tends to see patterns in what is in front of one’s eyes and in evolving relationships with man’s understanding of who he is and what God is. When made apparent or manifest in a post-enlightenment or experienced spiritual worldview, these patterns or synchronicities come to us feverously. Knowing this and alongside an open heart when it comes to scripture, one is left open and bare for an indwelling of the Holy Spirit.
Much of the Old Testament is Pagan with questionable morality, but there is also the beautiful spiritual insight, and it is clear the Holy Spirit did co-create some of those words. It is a complicated relationship that Christians have in that book because the God of the Old Testament was a jealous tyrant. As opposed to Christ who seems come from a completely different place.
