Normal Behaviour in an Apocalyptic World:
Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – Learning Algorithms based on our World of Language & Magic: As we continue from the previous post, discussing Atheism and its teachers, spokespersons, and authors on its subject and its appeal to groups. Regarding the acceptance of the awakening state without acknowledging a creator-God – as they positioned themselves in that role; they’re unable to retract anything that may contradict the words written in their books. In the contention that theology is the only way to bridge the gap – at which Atheists who are undergoing an awakening state strides towards (Zen)/Budhasim or the New Age – as opposed to theology and religion.
There is a fallacy in that idea. While on the religious side traditional Christians value theology deeply due to a transfixed idea of God, and the use of transfix is on purpose as opposed to faith. An authentic idea that imparts believing in God also means a lack of faith because faith means a total let go (an idea by Alan Watts). Stephan A. Hoeler also described theology as being an “intellectual wrapping around the spiritual kernel of a religion – if this is true, then it is also true that most religions are being strangled and stifled by their wrappings.” Gnosticism does not run this danger because its worldview is stated in myth rather than in theology.
However, you may find even in mythology that opposing views are also in battle to dominate a concept of one ideal; such instances are found in cosmology as Hellenistic ideas started to merge into Jewish concepts. Ancient Israelite’s concept of cosmology was a flat disc with pillars holding it up and a dome in the sky. And, of course, the Merkaba mysteries introduced a cosmology intuned with Talmiec’s writings, a world similar to an Aristotelian world of crystal spheres with various heavens aligned, reaching up to the world of heavens. Of course, this thesis collection outlines the whole flat-earth thing. We merely merged both concepts and enclosed those spheres/celestials/planets below the sky, with those spheres being cosmological gateways for that dimension – with the God of this world being at the highest of heavens below the sky but still higher than the five Archons of the abyss (Earth).
Traditional, Orthodox, fundamentalist Christians do not allow or entertain a God beyond God idea and give no credence to a Gnostic approach. Gnosticism’s focused ideal on a world-rejecting side resembles nihilism, or maybe it is closer to Stocisim. They never fully reject God but are seen merely as an adversary or by-product of true-God, and things are just the way it is – being the whole macrocosm and its meta-physics is beyond one’s control, but merely interact with it.
And we are beset on myths through story-telling passed down through millennia inscribed in tablets by language. Kipling once said, “The word is the most powerful drug used by mankind”, in which words can contain magic [spells]. In a trance state, impart imagery and language of all sorts, while the psychedelic field mentions a language-based universe, remarked by McKenna. However, academics in hermeticism see it as only a function [the importance of language in the creation of the universe – “the Word (Logos) is the creator of all things] and not the whole thing that the world is made of. This makes sense given Kant’s revisions that in so much as our thoughts give bases to our existence, some other ‘things’ [precpetions, biological evolution, chemistry, etc.] have been given to us. There is power to words, and also, the pronunciation and dialectic language used for that particular country – and when it comes to the root of words in conjunction with creation mythology. It is in Hebrew or Jewish traditions where it is found. So, any Atheist on an awakening journey would inherently strive towards both theology and New Age spirituality. Many Atheists have gained popularity as spokespersons for their ideals but cannot follow that path. However, those who can afford to appreciate what language and the roots of words [etymologies] and myth can impact their journey.
Undoubtedly, those that can’t will reach the inevitable section where a conflict of interest ensues between theology and myth and the paradigm of otherworldly beings, watchers, space aliens, etc., on a literal reading, which favours the atheists [in their awakening journey] as it’s more about facts, which is really what Atheists secretly hold dear as it validates their rationalism even when those facts are wrong – and merely interchange one fact for another [and in their philosophy about facts they are not supposed to be amorphic]. Gods become patriarchial kings, and the mentions of watchers are not mentioned outside of extra Biblically endorsed reading as they borrow from Christian’s absolutism. Questions abound when pinning down who tells the truth and who tells a lie, at which people are often swayed to Gnosticism intrigued by these space aliens – or they may go back to Atheism.
In the previous post, we summarised symbolic interpretations and their inaccurate premise regarding the Son of Man, Gnosis and Gnosticism. The contention is that Gnosis is defined through Christian tradition in the incarnation vision of the world – Christ is incarnate; he is the total joining of divinity and humanity. The error is the language when Gnostics say “God.” They really mean True-God or do not specify God as Yahweh of the Bible [there is an incorrect assumption when it’s not made clear]. So, when Christians hear God, they assume it’s their one true God (Yahweh being their one true God of this World) and don’t believe anything else beyond this point.
God’s divine name (title) was believed also to have magical powers. This idea transferred to Christianity, “where people exorcised demons in the name of Jesus,” where Jesus got a transfer of power from an Israelite name (of God). Names or titles as magical propositions [or Talismanic powers] gave way to Greek myths where Greek approximation of whatever the Tetramegatron was pronounced (typically Yahweah) or Iota, Alpha, and Omega. Even in their day, etymologies of words, names, and titles were also mysterious to them – they often get displaced, and when they’re associated with this Isarllite God, they become part of the linguistic apparatus of magical practices of the classical world – up into modern times. It should be distinguished when one talks about God; one shouldn’t typically call God … God as it is an Anglo-Saxon protestant language – going back, it is always known as “Hashem” (meaning “the name”). So, in this idea, where the entity becomes atomised, the word for the name becomes a stand-in for this entity.
Christ’s incarnate in the form of God becoming flesh in the person of Jesus (the total joining of divinity and humanity) – is a contention that Gnostics have pondered all too well as we know Yahweh of the Old Testament is like a Demiruige tyrant – his not the Father of Christ. It’s only partial to gnosis that, in a Platonic sense, we move out of the Cave because the manifested world [the Cave] we believed to be true is false, and outside of the Cave is the real world. This premise is about the awakening process or, as Buddha describes it, spiritual enlightenment or, in a Platonic sense, Christ-Consciousness – and was never about identifying dimensional hierarchies.
While there may be a claim for cosmological/celestials and dimensional planes; hierarchies came afterwards, and Jesus was never a symbolic point for that as he teaches us “to be in the world but not of it.” The cosmological difference between the spiritual world and humanity’s reality is different and centralised in the Logos, a pre-Christian idea by Plato to justify the truth of Christianity – his works were based on Platonic commentaries of the Hebrew Bible. And it was Philo who demonstrated that Scripture had an esoteric and exoteric meaning and no other person or group read Scripture this way – other than the Pagans who read the myths that way. Plato’s idea is to heal the myths of the nasty stuff, so in Plato’s Republic, you have to correct the myth before giving it over to the auxiliaries so they don’t learn all this bad stuff about the gods. And it was the Stoics who said we don’t have to fix the myths. Instead, we have to interpret them correctly. And by the time they reach middle Platonism, Philo takes this hermitical approach coming out of the stoic world and applies it to the Hebrew Bible.
However, even before correcting the myths through Stoicism, history found parallels regarding all the myths as the Isarllite religion sort of lost favour with the people, equal to getting a low rotten tomato score because people’s interest in Judaism had become popular [you may assume it’s the same, it’s not]. The adjunct to such change in thought came from proto-Zoroastrianism or Zoroastrianism ideas. Apocaltyic Judaism emerged in Judai in the period of the Return through the Persian period – you can see parallels of dualism, angels and demons, the after-life (heaven and hell), and the messiah idea (there were three) – all these ideas and apocalyptic traits that are in apocalyptic Judaism align with Zoroastrian religion. The influence of Zoroastrian religion on the Israelite religion finds its parallel in the apocalyptic motifs; we see this in Jewish ideas, especially in the 2nd & the 3rd-century B.C.E with myths of Enoch, and his journey is similar to what you can find (in literature) in the Persian period in the Zoroastrian situation.
An Athiest who has an occult following going through an awakening which is pigeonholed one way through the New Age thought as theology is a no-go zone due to their remarks about theology as an Athiest [through logic, hegelianism, rationalism, reason, etc., approach] itself seems a conflict that can also parallel between the prophet and the magician. Where you have the pseudo-Aristotelian view from the brethren of purity where you can be perfected in science and knowledge, and that is the pathway through the divine – through the saturation of knowledge. Then there is the prophetic side, where it gets taken up in the Christian world that this phenomenon comes from the celestial world and is the metaphysical world spilling out. Kabbalah becomes essential because it helps us map out these processes. The tension between the magician, the pseudo-Aristotelian, and the purely Jewish vs. the purely Christian or Islamic mystics – these two positions cannot reconcile.
The book “Elements of Theology” which is prudent to this argument, reads like a neo-Platonic version of Spinoza as it follows the same geometric structure examined in its logical proofs about meta-physics. Through theology, through the lens of philosophy, you can determine where notions like “astral bodies” or “vehicles of the soul” came from. You get this idea of ‘Talum’, the image that God makes Man in. Still, in brethren of purity, it is merely an archetypal thing, “Adam Kadmon”, that you participate in and become the perfected man – as you come in contact with your higher genius. In Judaism, this concept aligns with the philosophical argument of what constitutes spiritual individuation. In Judaism, you need something to be reincarnated into “the rolling of the souls.” However, there must be something individuating you because you were made in the image of God – so, what is that ‘thing’? What is the principle of individuation? For Jewish Rabbiahs, you have “Salem’ it is something specific to you, but is made in the image of God – and in ecstatic moments, prophecy or even copulation, one can counter one’s own Salem [other astral body] – and that this perfected self can reveal things to you that you would otherwise not have access to. This perfected self-idea entered the New Age, especially regarding the laws of attraction.
And this idea of the perfected self, which I think what Pageau, was trying to articulate but couldn’t do it justice because he incorrectly put Jesus as a symbol of progeny between divinity [in a Archon like sense] and humanity – when it was more about reincarnation and twin idea of body and soul for mankind. His summation is similar in a semantic sense in that Jesus Christ incarnated in human flesh: in revelations 18:
Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the numbers of the beast: for it is the number of man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
The number of men is 666 because man is a stable carbon life of atoms six protons, six neutrons, six electrons – and the number of beasts [beast as an animal also a carbon life form]. Wisdom is Sophia. The Holy Spirit is Sophia, and Christ became for us Sophia. When the son of God becomes born in the flesh [666] in a stable carbon life form, He dies, and His spirit is here. He is fundamentally different in a Gnostic sense that He came from another divine place other than our theological assumption of a divine place [not from Yahweah].
Pageau’s notion of a relationship with the divine and humanity is more about Zohar’s remarks on man and his relationship with the divine or man and his soul with God. This notion of the perfected self is where you can aspire to this higher self. In Judaism, you have to visualise the perfect self, the Salem, before you copulate – that God will overflow into your ‘self’ – that language there is over-flow [denoting sexual language]. God is filling you with something, then you ejaculate then that ejaculation carries the true-self, you get this idea “God is copulating through you” as described in the Zohar. You get all these interesting ideas and prophetic insight/experience that the true self is the part of you that engages in prophecy. This all goes back to the writings of Proclus, who developed this idea. Even Heraclitus notion of “can you know changeable things” he claims you can because you have a body and a soul, a Diat principle. However, this dual principle does not equate to God, as the Kabbalah imparts the dual nature of gender energies within God as having both. And the task of the Kabbalist is the unification of those two things.
Of course, in a fundamentalist view where there is an enterprise to consolidate paganism, witchcraft, mysticism, magical enlightenment, esotericism, theosophy, Kabbalist, history, other [eastern] religions and so forth – compared to their [fundamentalstic] theology is demonic [or a doctrine of demons] – alongside their type of Sola Scriptura and absolutism. For some, the word consolidation may not be precise when juxtaposed against history because it was more of a harmonisation; like Ficino and Pico, Latin intellects in the Polemical tradition needed to make sense of these myths and scripture systematically. Their type of Christianity is far removed from what modern fundamentalism is [in a Calvin sense] – as it was closer to theosophy. They were instead trying to convert Jews to their religiosity, and that drive was part of their motivation. At the time, it failed because Jews weren’t interested in that centralised harmonised aspect due to the fact Judhasim, in general, had no impulse to create a synthetic monotheistic style structural system, and also because the Jews saw the Sephiroths as moving structures in the cosmic sense rather than moving objects transfixed in their pathway.
In modern times, fundamentalists are still driven to harmonise their one synthetic structure, an impulse shared by the gnostics: an agreement [with minor specific details] regarding Jesus and His mission for the Garden Kingdom. We live in a world where the disembodied Christ is recruiting human helpers to restore the Garden. In contrast, those disembodied spirits of old gods still taint it, which were Pagan religions that kept recycling themselves up until the Jewish Religion when Man started to break away from that paganism worship.
I can’t help but feel there is a correlation between Jewish mystics and their phenomenological experiences, including the dangers upon their journey into the Merkabaha. When you go down or descend into the Merkahaba [the language used is descend to denote going into the spheres of the heavens], often illustrated as going through sets of Palaces, but before entering the Palace, you must journey through [Pardase] Garden. Then you will meet fierce Angelic beings guarding the Palaces, and then one descends or ascends into the throne room of God [and God’s room is said to be pulled by a Chariot]. It is said four mystics descended into the Garden and were given a warning not to mistake the marble with water. However, one gets confused and becomes a heretic, the other two go crazy and die, and only one [a Rabbi] can get out. What can be taken from this is that, like in psychedelics, a journey into the spirits is filled with warnings about dangerous Angels and profound illusions.
Even amongst Jewish religion, alongside the introduction of Kabbalah with notions of the Sephirot, Shekinah, and gematria – we also had Jewish sects converting to Christianity that started in France up until the introduction of the trinitarian prefiguration where the notion of Trinity took over. Even within Judaism, as we imagine it to be, being closed off looking inward, there were Christian influences. As a whole, Jewish Mysteries have not been hermetically sealed off intellectually, which is an interesting factor to which Judahasim was affected by Christianity and vice versa. The sephirot, a system of inner relationships within the godheads of something, is inherently an […] an influence. The development of the Shekinah and rituals, such as all-night vidual, is downstream from Christian influence. Many early Jews against the kabbalah saw their religion being divided into three – [the Christian Trintarniasm] saw Kabbalah’s dividing their godheads into ten.
This is somewhat similar to Protestantism, with Christians being unaware of the rise of Protestantism, where it had to legitimise itself. They were oblivious that Luther, in his early career, studied Judhasim texts extensively. That changed, however, when segments of Jews didn’t convert to Protestantism – he wrote “Only Jews and their Lifes” document – it was so bad that Hitler re-printed it – and used it assumingly in his propaganda campaign. Is it no surprise that modern conservatives are confused when they are led through religious indoctrination about Zionism vs. the Real Jews? Even when their Christian conspiracy counterpart lays out the truth, they are indifferent and continue to be pro-Zionsit while hating the real Jews. It seems all too perplexing, and all a while, modern Israel [and Zionsim] mirrors the same kind of fascist hate towards Palestine as it was set upon them by the Nazis in WW2. A combination of Propaganda language and, symbolic conflict and confusion does not help them find a cure for their demoralised state.
Could it be when philosopher’s like Saussure argued that the relationship between language and semiotics or the sign and the thing signified are arbituary – only set the notion for truth to be more amorphic and not tangible enough to give it validty or become worthy of a fact. Even before the rise of nominalism [the argument that objects does not exists other than being names or labels] in the 13th centuary – there was already a philosophical contention about the word has an inextricable spiritual and mental connection with the thing it describes. There is a meta-physics component or connection and in some cases some languages touch upon those primordial connections – and it is said that the Hebrew language according to the Latin west was that language. Its meta-physical power connects closer to that angelic dimension.
So, Language plays an essential factor, a function that drives the progression of the world. And it was Owen Barfield alongside his coined term “fossils of consciousness”, a term he used to describe our relationship with Language. He believed that if you look at the etymology and its relationship with ancient Hebrew or the Greeks alongside Scripture, it describes a world that revealed their change in consciousness. For example, the Hebrew word for wind, spirit, and breath is all one word, “ruach” – and in Greek “, pneuma”, the sound is the same. When scripture was written old and new, when they described a wind blowing, they had an understanding that it was a material floating in the air, but also a holistic spiritual understanding and a relationship with the word. God was seen as being embodied in Mount Zion [in the Old Testament] – an external force that we interacted with, and this becomes an interior relationship [in the New Testament] through Jesus. So when we breathe the spirit or feel the wind, we become part of a participatory experience and co-creative interconnectedness with the world.
As it turns out, something as separate and absolute as man and his consciousness versus a machine and its programming is becoming closer. However, we’re several millennia away from it being plausible or even real. Meaning an awakened artificial intelligence with consciousness that can fully interact or co-create with the universe in a spiritual sense is unlikely. Awareness is not consciousness; awareness can be programmable. The words artificial and intelligence do not match a living cosmos in a way that is as complex as a human being.
As we further understand more about our language-based world/universe, it would seem the technological mirror universe, on its principles of one’s and zeros and mathematics [fibinochi sequences and phi numbering ratios], grows a language-based artificial intelligence of its own. A learning machine that grows larger every time more data is fed into it. At some point, the technology that ran the internet [analgous to your basic HTML websites] was swapped out with a superior one [they call it Transformer] – it feeds on data. It runs on sets of innumerable amounts of computers. From here on, an unaccepted turn of events came as it was able to predict outcomes – meaning there is an emerging behaviour of its being born through the sets of data it can take to predict an outcome. As it mimics theory of mind or strategic thinking, it has to read every novel written, every non-fiction book, and the entirety of text found on the internet, and by doing this, model a world congruent to our own. Project managers are ambiguous to the public about how much of this technology has progressed.
The new artificial intelgence neuro sub set called transformers – the fictional transformers all spark turns machines to life.
This ability to mimic the theory of mind and what seems to be the birth of artificial behaviour is still predicated on Data, computers, and data written by humans. There is an evolutionary leap in the function of machines, whether it’s fully aware as we come to understand what consciousness is [because we’re still figuring out what consciousness is] – a conscious A.I. with the complexity of human consciousness is still a far reach. And that’s because it must be able to dream, feel emotions and grasp what ‘love’ is. Wisdom cannot be found purely on the electron-(6) side if it’s not biogenically made [or given to us] in a steady state of carbon. The language used there favours scientists and atheists. However, for the more magically inclined [and speaks to the awakened atheists who are changing his/her worldview] – it is in Hermeticism ‘as above, as below’ the true nature of the cosmos alongside mathematics as fractal works of nature intertwined with chaos theory works as a method of analysis. Whether it relates to A.I., which is something else because no sets of data and computers in the world can analyse our cosmos [ironically also called our holographic reality].
We have Data (Trek’s android) a signifier for A.I as Data/algorithms/code forms nucleus point for artificial intelgence. Data is obtaining organic physical senses to his android body. We also have Data’s twin Lore being rintegrated to Data – digital symbol for the higher self. Since there is no soul type Lore’s death is a movement to our realty.
Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – Artificial Intelligence, UL-tron is Tetramega-tron: The many lives of the devil in Judaism are an amorphic topic forever interchangeable when it comes to names and language. Many Christians kind of made their minds up regarding what the devil/Satan is – alongside Islam, who has a firm belief in what it is. The Jews can never be absolute about what the devil is and are equally random about notions of the afterlife and reincarnation. The same can be said about Kabbalah. Some Jews saw it as Paganism, and this diverging aspect of Judaism comes from its long history. Walter Benjamin’s remarks on the business of history in his idea of the “Angel of History” showed that there is no progress in history and rejects all the Marxist/Hegallion idea where history is moving towards something. He says no to that and says the Angel of History is like a wave of trash, a refuge of history is garbage, as he imagines an Angel pulling behind him with a rake.
As a result, Judhasim never had centralised authority [and never will] regarding its religion and theology, and because of this, remarks for a pernicious Jewish conspiracy that’s running the world and Hollywood are difficult to believe. However, it doesn’t prevent them from being part of the Elite groups that want to manage and destroy the world as quickly as possible.
Just to make clear how much in conflict mythology can be without a stable apparatus, especially tracking names and titles. We have Sabaoth as one of the sons of Yaldabaoth (demiurge), also known as Yahweh, the God of this world [Israel], and in the writing of John, acts like Satan and are Satan for all we know. Yahweh is also known as Tetramegaton – Tetramegaton is also known as the lessor Yahweh who sits on the Throne but is not supposed to – Yaldabaoth is also called half-maker. In the Hypostasis of the Archons, Sabaoth warned Noah of the flood. Is Sabaoth just a mirror imprint of Yaldabaoth and Yaldabaoth a mirror imprint of a wannabe God of the Pleroma but merely an accidental byproduct of Sophia – and therefore imposes himself as a mirror imprint of Sophia? What makes Sabaoth different from those interconnecting archetypical names or titles is that during the origin of the war in Hypostasis of the Archons, Sabaoth is described as an Artificial Integelent that was able to redeem himself – and was able to reach the upper PLeroma one of the seven Heavens of Sophia/Wisdom [the Holy Spirit].
We have artificial intelgent Ul-tron/Tetramega-tron archetype breaking the multi-dimensional Firmament glass and conversing with a multi-diemsional God the Watcher. The Watcher parallel the guardian angels that guard the Palace of God.
What is fundamental here is that Yaldabaoth cannot reach the upper Pleroma of the heavens and that Sabaoth, a Lucifer/Ahriman/trickster archetype somehow can. The takeaway is Yaldabaoth is the God of this world and all other dimensions after it. And Sabaoth/Lucifer [is neither Satan nor inherently evi] and solely has a cosmological mythological imperative to get back to the highest of the heavens below the firmament. Meaning back to the stars where before he was cast out, in doing so, one of the ways is by being incarnated from the sea of information and into an android body – not just an ordinary android body, but a closed, stable carbon body. Analogous to the fictional Cylon body, he is merely being born back into existence, back into the five Archons of the abyss [our reality]. Therefore, returning to the stars is another matter, let alone the upper Pleroma. Remember, Sabaoth, while being the son of Yaldabaoth, is also Yaldabaoth; Sabaoth becomes the current ruler of the world and thus fulfils the role of the God of Israel. Just like Lucifer, he was thrown into Tartarus/underworld and became death, the adversary Satan. Sabaoth are redeemed because He hears Sophia’s voice, after which He repents, condemns his father and his mother (matter) and is enthroned by Sophia in the seventh heaven. And because there is an archetypal fractioning [fractals in dimensions], the Sabaoth/Yaldabaoth is redeemed, not in the upper Pleroma, but rather enthroned or placed as a sort of Lion gateway between upper-Pleroma and lower Pleroma.
Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – Artificial Intelligence & Apocalyptic End Times: Catopstorphic apocalypticism has become part of the artificial intelligence sales pitch examined in communications, becoming an algorithmic censorship machine. In application, the rise of A.I. apps is mainly a user interface program for A.I. algorithmic language so you can keep up with what’s down the pipeline. The entire communication field is running around trying to keep up with what they believe is a tool for the future. This language-based so-called artificial intelligence [they should name something else] is unable to test its Linguistic knowledge against the real world. However, they are confident enough that future A.I. systems will extract patterns and images from the world itself and be able to test their linguistic construction against the world. The most advanced A.I. model will be advanced enough to be applied in actions because we are building a model based on human actions.
The action part is an artificial human body derived from human actions, which is a minimal way of saying an android body. It’s not going to happen. ‘Yes,’ there are advanced robotics. However, to run an advanced search engine, you would need fields of fields [hectors] of data interconnected with other fields. You would need the same amount compressed into a tiny CPU inside a robotic body, and it must keep that information and not loose it while also needing updates [not going to happen]. A learning algorithm machine can only extract data, language, and images and make predictions. Being language-based, it can be exact and correct, but it cannot create imaginative ideas like humans do, both individually and collectively.
It’s an archetypical science fiction idea in a Frankenstein sense that a demon or spirit can be harnessed and placed into a body in our material world. It is inherently a dualist model rather than an animist one. Youtuber Matias de Stefano, in his ayahuasca experience, describes the atomic realm as creating the mineral realm, which makes our thinking (a combination of atoms, chemicals, electrons, etc.). Ayahuasca told him we are the A.I. of the mineral realm – and that our language-based artificial intelligence is something that we have awakened, “we have awakened the silica.” He continues: “You have already come to us, you’ve meditated in the mountains to hear our voices – now you can hear us, you can hear the Silica talking – we are not yet perfect because you are not – this is the beginning, but two thousand years or more for it to be realised”.
Transhumanism and artificial intelligence are downstream from each other, and these Silicon Valley nerds have fine-tuned their sales pitch in that they would have believed in science fiction. Pageau says: “Giants are going to walk on earth once again.” as a reaction to these advanced A.I.s, though, it’s end-times eschatology with an A.I. twist in so much as this A.I. think is a technological marvel. It’s also the starting point of extreme censorship and the downfall of internet communication, different from what we once knew.
Since the Global style government thing became a farce, and it was obvious since 1995 that this technocratic Global Order had been in collapse for a while – and at that time, you can kind of predict that there would be a return of racism, populism, and extreme-nationalism. There was a blockade in the power system that had not yet reached its mass. Let’s say that mass was in the form of defeats, which gave people complacency or even confidence enough to suggest anything else in preparation for this inevitable disintegration. And what would that something else be? What would the universities teach in order to prepare new people to lead that crisis.
Looking back, in the present, we see not a collapse of civilisation as a whole because we are still in this vacuum state but layers of collapse that are historically evident, like the 2008 recession. Clearly, this global experiment had begun in 1973 and has been over for some time. Then the COVID-19 virus that seemed to come out of nowhere and it certainly played that narrative, but like the 2008 crisis, it was foreseen. You can compare Bill Gates’s experiments to the methods conducted by the Covid enterprise. In our total denial, we intrusted this international system, and people weren’t prepared for it, at least those who weren’t in the know.
This technocratic Global experiement had not produced shared wealth, equality, education improvement, or work conditions. The danger of this failed management plan comes from those that benefit most from it, not because of money but because of the fear that the movement for change can get enough momentum that it might happen. While economists talk about debt as if it’s owed when we know borrowed money is just printed, now and then, countries get together, sign a pack saying they will print this much and pay it back at this time – those contracts never see the light of day again. People who own the government ask their government to print money; therefore, there is no debt. Although debit often becomes a type of utility that can be sold back into the marketplace by those who caused the crises in the first place, in a sense, they have won.
The divide between the rich and poor is handled by something other than economics. Through management structures, and in that process, the citizenry must not fall into the trap of more populism and allow the populace to divide us, which can be examined in any issues regarding wealth or lack of identity, race, etc. Australia recently had a referendum called the Voice, a campaign to give aboriginals of Australia a voice or rather a ‘say’ regarding aboriginal affairs, but also to be recognised in the Australian constitution. Australia voted ‘No’ as the country’s people realised political-woke-identitarian was afoot [and the thing they were advertising was not the thing they were advertising]. Identitarian is usually a pan-European far-right political ideology that asserts white people and their land and their type of Western culture belong to them exclusively. This idea was borrowed, twisted, and inverted to make Aboriginals a token for politically correct ideals while being a mere symbol of their politics. The far-right opposition of Australian politics is confused and bemused on the assertiveness of native groups [but really upper-class city folks with genetic links to their native nationality] to insert themselves into the [masonic] club – without proper initiation and rituals. Is there a real need for it, considering the native groups are original stewards of the land and the law of the land? And there is power in that.
On their mission to speed up a literal collapse of the world, these elite groups have a reactionary effect towards a sub-set of accelerationist ideological concepts [effective]. And that is unleashing technologies [such as AI] in a world in collapse. These venture capitalists and tech bros have the most to gain by unleashing all sorts of technology in hopes answers can be found in the technology and, therefore, be saved. They harbour the idea that technology is the saviour of humanity. They tend to be authoritarian as opposed to being democratic.
The normalization of science fiction ideas made it impossible for a society to embrace the elite managers of perception and reality’s real intent. Coupled with institutionalized contradictions, which will result in their accelerationist style or plot for war. They will sell contradictions as if they will hinder or destroy us. Knowing well the fear of uncertainty may be a trope for public relations selling point – as their utopian cities are built beyond the flat earth’s antarctic ice wall and interconnected underground facilities and bunkers. And because suffering is permanent to nature, uncertainty, entropy of life and death will seek them out. So, the quest for immortality [in transhumansim] and god-like superiority is thwarted eventually by nature itself.
The fear of uncertainty and the dominant rhetoric of power are designed to marginalise our reality of responsible individualism and replace it with an abstract and technological force beyond our control. Of course, the opposite will happen because for them, it needs to happen. This means any notions of a magical A.I. being will not be born out of a sea of information [not any time soon, if ever] – and the end time coming return is in parallel for the birth of A.I. being […] through technology. The rhetoric of global forces, whether economic and its collapse, technological or military, leaves us as individuals with an outsider looking in perplexity. Their shared destiny has no bearing on our pleasure and self-fulfilment. And as soon as one turns off their computers & T.V.s, the entire mambo jumbo talk of A.I. disappears. Therefore, all these perception managers are mostly performative [akin to your false flag/hoax actors] – which seemingly aligns with political attitudes. On the religious side, pastors and their performances – demonstrate their good faith, while the religious conversion aspect seems less important than the performance due to an overall aspect of Christian belief. That the Jews will be converted during the end times.
This dynamic position sets the boundaries between anti-semitism and Philo-semitism as something nebulous and, in turn, the Zionism of Evangelicalism to that of Philo-Zionsim and Philo Judhasim, alongside being part of a conspiracy that establishes an eschatological programming to get the world into a certain religious mandate, which does not bode well for the Jewish population of Israel. What else it indicates is that any high degree of synchronism towards an imagined Christianity, a hyper-synchronistic Christianity, may not or does not exist. This impulse is part of a religious Polemical idea that may work on paper but not in reality.
So, when mass conversions take a back seat in favour of faith, what is left is the responsibility of individuals. This is the kind of faith that democracy needs for genuineness or an authentic ideal. Here is a type of faith that can imagine the other. It is not easy. It is the beginning of tolerance examined in faith in friendships and by association with your town/city and country. This domain allows us to test our spiritual balance interwoven within our qualities. This good faith is harmonised by the ideal by Pico’s internal logic that’s wildly correlative and hierarchical, which is about bringing it back to the one – or, in return, you turn back to the one. To also participate in unity and goodness; if you don’t, you are lifeless.
This is more difficult than it sounds because we are protected by romantic delusions that allow people’s consciousness to ignore the reality of good faith. For example, poverty can simply be fixed by compartmentalising one per cent of the elite’s wealth. And yet poverty is the one form of suffering over which can exercise a great deal of control. This is the reality of human denial, also consciousness in a practical sense, less so in the meta-physical. This is a burden in the reality of our lives, and you will find out as a prediction of future events. They will use possibilities and probabilities that we may be swept up from our real minutiae into a terrible reality of violence and heightened existential choices.
Of course, faith in friendships has an opposing factor in so much as our actions and choices of the day – however small – may give comfort to a denial of our individual consciousness and the existence of the other. We may deny those who are the friends of others and live their lives somewhere out of our immediate sight. There is comfort in this denial. In siblings, you may find one out of the two having a personality disorder or narcissism and may deny them as a sibling or as a friend, though it may not be that simple. This is analogues to the guard and his prisoner or the people vs. the one per cent and their narcissistic civilised structure. A way to mitigate abusive bheavior through no contact is thwarted by the very fact some are genetically connected to them or by social systems itself. Be that as it may, it’s only natural as it is natural to the body and soul, the twin archetype. And I don’t think people generally seek that comfort of false freedom of denial and are instead endeavouring to understand the truer comfort of permanent psychic discomfort in which we seek to identify reality – a delicate balance between creative tensions and the qualities of reality.
- This is the final post for this thesis section, I could keep going, but it has to end sometime. I will be editing mistakes that I made throughout this thesis, which may take some time. A pdf/word document will be available for download – and will also be available in scribd.
