The Awakening:
The Aspirations of the Solar Cultist Bruno: The 30-year war was triggered by the end of the alchemical dream, a concept initiated by Dee. This dream, which had a profound impact, was a driving force in the political dynamics of Europe during the war. Initially, the region was under the dominion of popes and kings. However, according to the war’s conclusion, parliaments and people had taken the reins. This period marked a significant shift, with the medieval world fading into a distant memory. England, in particular, embraced this new political order and emerged as a beacon for modern science. The post-alchemical renascence thinkers interpreted these changes as a reflection of contemporary science.
There seems to be a strange cosmic fate between Maier and Descartes, just as there is one between Bruno and Dee. Bruno was the one person who turned a magical cosmology into a science. In a wishful fictional alignment, the two would have crossed paths in London but missed each other by two weeks. Bruno sailed to England, while Dee went to France on his Rosicrucian mission. The novel “Agypt” by John Crowley retells these two men’s lives, philosophies, and ideas, highlighting their differences.
Embarking on a personal odyssey through the cosmos, guided by the insights of psychedelics, Bruno experienced a transformative moment of clarity. This profound observation led him to reject the old worldview that had confined the soul, and instead, he unveiled a cosmological vision of a living earth revolving around a divine sun. In this new vision, countless other worlds populated an infinite universe, all propelled by the captivating force of magical animism. Bruno’s act of cognition not only dismantled the old cosmological vision but also aimed to liberate the soul from its confinements.
The philosophical roots of both Bruno and Dee can be traced back to the influential figure of Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa, who features in Faust. Agrippa’s “Dalibria Quatro de Occulta Philosophia,” a cornerstone of European magic, was a product of his studies under the Trithemius. This work deeply influenced both Bruno and Dee. Bruno, in particular, was a champion of the alchemical spirit and saw hermetic philosophy as the true religion, with Hermetica and Cabala also leaving their mark. The profound connection between Agrippa, Bruno, and Dee is as intriguing as the relationship between Freud and Jung.
He had a complex set of beliefs. On one hand, he believed in the alchemical worship of “God in things” ‘its profound magic,’ and its view, expressed in Asclepius, that the ‘magnum miraculum homo est.’ He also admired the Egyptians for their devotion to the One in all. However, he wanted to introduce these ideas to Europe in a new way to bring about a cosmic and moral revolution. He created a form of numerology called “mathesis”, which used symbols, such as a gold sun sign for mentus, a silver moon for intellectuals, and a five-pointed star for amoris. He supported the idea that religion and science were intertwined, particularly the Egyptian religion and that a divine mind could gain godlike powers. Due to his controversial ideas, he was executed by the Church in 1600.
His death laid out as a martyr according to his followers, who continued his work in the likes of Tommaso Campanella — continued in the revolution based on the hermetic principles of Las Citta del sole (1602 ‘City of the Sun), a work that reflects the ideal city of Adocentyn in the Arabic Picatrix. Tommaso is a hermetic believer in the World Soul and the intimate correspondence between heaven and earth. The City of the Sun was designed like a Compass or Celtic cross with four roads going in each of the four directions and, in the middle, the round Sun Temple. The City of the Sun and its architecture are run by adepts called Solarians.
The Vatican had good reason to be fearful of Bruno and Campanella in their desire to bring about religious, moral and social revolution based on hermetic philosophy. Thomas Aquinas had defended magic and alchemy, and many priests, especially in Dominican circles, were being won over by the new vision. Even popes were not immune. The Hermetic philosophy was a great attraction and a considerable threat. Hermeticism as a whole is a culmination of magic (spirit) and science, and such a position can be contradictory in itself, which, at times, the Vatican (Church) has shown. Determining its official position against modernity mimics those who claim that spirit science is a mixed bag, recognised in its position that either you get bad science or lousy mysticism combined. The Church has the same position by keeping science and religion separate.
Separate disciplines are its true position, but see science more favourable; if it’s not science, the Church won’t recognise it. Alchemy is out of place today and is merely part of the history of science alongside magic. The Church and its arm of the Inquisition had rejected the findings of science and persecuted their practitioners if they conflicted with official dogma. The Middle Ages version of Fox News or Murdoch News Empire was about propagandising that Bruno and Copernican theory of a satellite cosmology would result in their deaths – as a reflection on the Church’s insistence that the biblical interpretation, which states the earth is at the centre of the universe. I submit to you that they never folded in that belief. Still, instead, Bruno’s death was by superstition, not science, and the Church’s genuine fear was being threatened by the revolutionary uproar and the reintroduction of an ancient Egyptian cult stemming from worshipping the sun.
The death of the alchemical dream alongside medieval politics also meant the death of these spiritual artisans like angel dealings, horoscope casting, and alchemy-pursuing visionaries of Rosicrucians renascence became simply objects of historical curiosity – utterly incomprehensible to the people who followed them throughout the generations. With the birth of a new democracy, politics has established itself and prophesied in Descartes’s vision that this new world and its new cosmology will be measured in numbers. Until the present, where we inherited a world whose ideologies are exhausted and can only be refreshed from the marginalities of societies. Back to meaning, back to the alchemical dream or somewhat less ritualistic and hermetic and back to being (oh, you know, just) “good.”
The image on the right is a still from the science fiction drama Three Body Problem, based on a novel of the same name. The picture shows a physics teacher about to be executed during the Maoist Cultural Revolution in China simply because he believed in physics. Before he died, he declared that science cannot determine whether or not God exists. This means that science cannot prove the existence of God, and faith alone cannot be proven either. However, some people interpret this scene as the death of science in modern times. If we remove the Chinese cultural context, this scene could symbolize what is happening all around the world. People are starting to see the flaws within science. This scene is like a litmus test: if you take away something that has been held in high regard by society for centuries, such as science, then a revolutionary revolt may occur. Some Christian conspiracy groups, such as flat-earthers and Christian conspiracy theorists, are among those who are trying to reveal the flaws in science. Therefore, some people believe that this scene symbolizes the death of science, which is also the death of alchemy’s poor substitute.
What came out of the new-atheist movement invoked pride in facts (and rationalism), and we know facts are just building blocks for rationalism. We see these facts in evolution, which is wrong apart from the adaptive behaviours found in A.I., and facts that are found in space cosmology, which is wrong apart from its magical inherency or diluted aspect of Hermeticism. This rationalism is used for political correctness and finds its parallel in Maoism, which is very close to what woke-sim is today. But let’s not forget that woke-ism does not create ideas. Rather, they take those ideas and, like a parasite, change them to fit their agenda. Also, the left never changed or never went anywhere. Instead, as McKenna describes DMT, the world has been replaced. The left was replaced by a cult post-leftist organisation that seemed to have a high liberal reach. The true left is still there; they are just made silent, and those who speak for them don’t honestly talk for them.
The image on the left shows Bruno’s execution, which represents the same problem depicted on the right panel. A significant perspective in this context comes from St. Thomas Aquinas, who believed that if something is scientifically proven, we can’t use theological or philosophical reasons to deny its truth. Instead, we should adjust our interpretation of the Bible because two valid proofs can’t contradict each other. We can’t use theology to define scientific concepts, but science can’t explain all theological mysteries. These two approaches can work together and complement one another.
It isn’t easy to prove the concept of hyperreal space as a cosmology, just as it is challenging to prove evolution. The argument here is that there may be an element of magic involved. Giordano Bruno introduced a new cosmology known as the Alchemical dream, which John Dee originally started. However, even though this concept fails, it has come full circle and become an alchemical symbol for gold. It’s like your dream about finding gold coins on the ground, which you keep picking up as you discover more.
The Sloarians are practitioners of benevolent magic who follow the teachings of Hermes Trismegistus. They ensure that the City of the Sun, designed to imitate the city of light described by the Chaldeans, is in harmony with celestial influences so that its inhabitants can enjoy good health, happiness, and virtue. According to a manuscript that Campanella wrote while he was in prison, the high priest of the Solarians is represented by a circle with a dot in the centre, which is the alchemical symbol for gold.
Difference Between Magic and Sorcery: In Colin Wilson’s “The Occult, A History”, his summation of the difference between magic and sorcery is important. Primitive man possessed super-sensory instincts of the lower animals: telepathy and intuition of danger that was needed for hunting. 60.000 years ago, the age of Cro-Magnon man appeared, and magic came in the form of Stone Age science (fires and stone tools). – Colin Wilson
| The inevitable occurred; the ‘white,’ sympathetic magic of the shamans turned into something more personal. Sorcery came into existence. Sorcery must be dearly distinguished from ordinary magic or witchcraft, which is simply the use of extrasensory powers – that is, telepathy and water-divining are simple forms of witchcraft. Sorcery is the attempt at the systematic use of such powers by means of ‘spells,’ potions, rituals and so on. A simple distinction would be to say that witchcraft is fundamentally passive, sorcery fundamentally active. – Colin Wilson |
Witchcraft and magic depend upon higher levels of consciousness, a wider grasp of reality than man normally possesses, and in this regard are close to mysticism. Sorcery may depend upon supernormal powers, but it sets out from everyday consciousness, the everyday personality. The characteristic of the everyday personality is its will-to-power. The mystical urge, on the other hand, transcends all these – examined in poets and their intuitive connection with the mysteriousness of the universe. – Colin Wilson
This is interesting. It means right-centric Christian intellectuals blame postmodernism as an intellectual prerequisite to affirm notions that the ‘acquisition power’ is built into postmodernism. This not only is wrong but also misleads their followers. [You can argue men are naturally driven by these urges as part of self-transcendence: examined in politicians lying just to win elections or corporations and their desire for money and power. The essential difference is that the poet somehow ‘rejects himself;’ he is not interested in his personality and its aggrandisement. The difference between a magician and a sorcerer is that the magician is disinterested, like a poet or scientist; the sorcerer wants personal power. – Colin Wilson].
The Protestant movement that failed in Prague became reactionary and made its way to the American Federation. Still, it was not a true federation as it was created within a nineteenth-century Enlightenment model. Countries like Canada and Australia were formed in a medieval style from the mid-nineteenth century and were not intended to be classic nation-states. The US is like a malignant narcissistic big brother to Canada, Australia and other commonwealth countries. It is impossible to cooperate with or detach from, as it is psychologically entrenched.
Bohemia was originally used to describe different alchemical cults in Europe and America, but it later became a term to describe hippie types. These class differences were significant enough to claim there were spies among different bohemians.
The protests against the Church may have been driven by indifference. However, the Church gave in to their demands because they shared similar concerns in the bigger picture. The ideas about magic and the future are influenced by power and sorcery. Since there are variations in magic and sorcery, it’s essential to delve into the intricacies of distinguishing between a genuine cosmology and a stylized version of Bruno/Copernican cosmology. It’s up to you to decide which is which, but remembe that a satellized cosmology is based on a spell and has already been established. The mathematical languages used in physics and astronomy are simply tools that support the spell. Some may argue that this satellized cosmology is just a semantic derivation of the previous cosmology, but they can run parallel in some instances.
Bruno was a sorcerer who died like a witch. To truly understand Christians’ “dogmatic warnings” about magic, we must denounce Bruno’s worldview, which was based on false and hyperreal sorcery. This means that aspects of the Protestant movements, such as a satellized worldview that includes believers external to Protestantism (which practically everyone currently holds), must be folded back into a pre-Bruno worldview. For Protestants, this means going back to Dee’s alchemical dream.
Of course, its abstract is too large, and disenchantments come in fragments, and it’s implied that our modern society is so obsessed with technology and progress that it has created a false reality or hyperrealism in which we live. People believe in this reality so much that it has become a fact, even if it may not be entirely accurate. To maintain this false reality, secret plans and events (rituals of star magic) are organized to create symbolic and magical connections to astrological events. For example, the moon landing was a well-planned ritual that NASA used to create an incentive for star magic. Similarly, other space launches and space stations are like symbolic altars for NASA. Overall, the text implies that our reliance on technology and our desire for progress have led us to create a false reality that we believe in so strongly that we are willing to perform rituals and magic to maintain it.
It’s no coincidence that Bruno died on February 17, 1600. The letter ‘Q’ is the 17th letter in the alphabet and is considered to be a symbol of the Egyptian god Horus. Horus is a falcon-headed deity whose right eye represents the Sun or Morning Star, symbolizing power and quintessence. His left eye represents the Moon or Evening Star, symbolizing healing.
| It’s also worth mentioning that NASA wanted to fire three rockets at the moon during the eclipse, and they called this mission “APEP” (Aapep, Apepi, or Apophis). They wanted to study the Sun’s corona, but what they want to tell you is that it’s also a symbolic suggestion to wound the moon so Horus’s eye starts to flicker, which is a reference to the blinking Algol (demon) star in the Perseus Constellation. |
Bruno is the Chris(t) Cornell of his time. Instead of being the crucified hanged man, he is burnt at the stake and made to look like a lamb for heresy in parallel with witchcraft and witch burnings. In a sense, fire is one element of the five in Wiccan tradition – in a sense, for his spell to work to truly transform (in speculation) a soul for sorcery to transform a cosmology to his making. When we discuss transformation, we have to acknowledge the work of Lull, where he describes argentum vivum (mercury), a substance known as original matter, and it is said that God used original matter to create all things: the Angels, the heavenly spheres, plane(ts), stars, and the terrestrial bodies. Part of the mercury became the four elements of fire, air, earth and water. But there is a fifth element, the quintessence. Horus’s right eye (the sun) is found in its pure state in the heavenly spheres.
This is interesting. The heavenly spheres are your moon and Sun, which is different from the plane(t) of existence – meaning the celestial spheres are contained within the body of the plane(t). Thanus is simultaneously God-like with the glove and God-King without – he is Ra with the glove and Yan without. So, when Horus covers the Sun with his left eye/moon, Ra loses his power, and the fifth element (quintessence), so Ra and his sun-cult minions try to destroy it symbolically.
It is said that Lullian adepts wanted to manipulate the power of the fifth element and increase its activity for the world. To obtain the quintessence of the fifth element, they experimented with hallucinogenic alcohol, but the process of doing it was in tune with alchemy. Modern science couldn’t reproduce what they had, but what resulted was the release of purified ‘spirit’ from gross matter, which had great symbolic importance for the alchemist. Sipping his ‘brandy’ of the angels,’ he may have had wondrous visions of the whole.
McKenna once stated that alchemy and shamanism are seamless enterprises, and shamanism is a hallucinogenic pursuit full of adepts who can codify symbolic meaning beyond our reality. Surprisingly, Bruno’s moment of clarity was induced by psychedelic drugs, which inspired his infinite space cosmology. He was also a student of alchemy, and the connecting figure between the Sharman and Alchemist is about mixing bases. The Sharman and the Smith, according to primitive cultures, are associated with brotherly figures.
The Vatican had a clear intention to explain away past errors concerning the Inquisition (political upheaval of the time) and also to condemn Hermetic philosophers and alchemists and had all the intention to keep science and religion separate and distinct. To some academics, alchemy was merely superstition like magic or astrology; it had nothing to contribute to either theology or science. Of course, this is a falsehood, given the evidence and argument I laid out before you. A remark regarding sun worship being pagan while superstition can be found in alchemy can justify merit. To say science and religion are the only things that can hold value to truth is a misconception.
Erroneous Psychologism: Today, the belief in alchemy is often ridiculed and considered a joke, much like the belief in a flat earth. It seems doomed to extinction as its intellectual adversaries march on proudly in their Darwinian cults of scientific progress. However, the early treatises of the Corpus Hermeticum, early Platonic philosophy, and the Hebrew Scriptures played a significant role in the emergence of gnostic thought.
In comparing Mesopotamian and Alexandrian times and what came out of them, it is important to clarify the concept of modern Gnosticism. Mesopotamian Gnosticism was characterised by paranoia, severity, radicalism, duality, rigour, and aesthetics. In contrast, Alexandrian Gnosticism was more urban, cosmopolitan, libertine, and permissive. While the Mesopotamian sect still exists today, the Alexandrian sect has vanished. Nowadays, Gnostics are often targeted by orthodox groups and face persecution. We are currently in a gnostic age, but the polarity has shifted and definitions have changed due to urbanisation, communication technology, and technological advancements in general. This is an age where traditionalism has fallen away because of the radical changes that have emerged in every direction. As a result, Gnosticism, with its dynamic and reactive nature, continues to adapt itself to modernity, a quality that is sure to intrigue.
Gnosticism, with a materialist likeness, tries to appropriate gnostic ideas. Still, it does so through the intermingled language of science and science fiction – the kind of science fiction you find in unique stories and comics. They attempt to literalise and materialise ideas of Gnosticism where the material itself is a hoax. When describing the ‘eye’ symbology, which incidentally is a symbolic expression for three of the Egyptian gods Osiris, Horus, and Ra, the eye in the middle of the triangle is the eye of the creator of this world, which is Yahweh archetypally a mirror, to Ra.
A materialist-gnostic would take God out of the equation and impose that an alien civilisation so advanced can manipulate the atom to the extent it can control it. By changing the structure and scale of atoms, they can mimic entire worlds and then collapse back onto themselves. Although it seems like magic, the aliens use the language of science and physics to achieve this. This idea is explored in the three-body problem, where advanced beings can control atoms using something called Sophons, which can be artificially controlled on a quantum level. The author’s point is that consciousness is separate from matter, and thermal dynamics and technology can control matter instead of a spiritual overlord. Sophons gradually become an “eye,” symbolising the all-seeing God watching over us.
The gold symbol is part of Dee’s alchemical Hieroglyphic Monad symbol. On one level, the hieroglyph (see below) is the symbol of mercury, and on the sign of Aries, It contains the symbol of gold, the circle, joined to a symbol of silver, the crescent. Both rest on a rectilinear cross representing the ‘ternary’ and the ‘quaternary.’ The ‘magical ternary’ of our earliest ‘forefathers and wise men consisted of the body, ‘spirit and soul’ while the quarternary represents the four elementary compounds of heat, cold, moisture and dryness (fire, earth, water and air). The Cross, according to Dee, is the Octonary.
The complex symbol of the monad has extraordinarily rich alchemical associations. The hieroglyph embodies the whole alchemical process, with the sign of Aries representing fire, the sign of mercury, the alembic, and the point within the circle, gold. Interlaced with the crescent moon, they represent the chemical wedding of Sol and Luna, which gives birth to the Philosopher’s Stone. As much as the Herioglyph is a symbol that encompasses the whole cosmos, if it’s also engraved in the mind, it leads to an experience of gnosis.
As we know, Horus’s eye is referenced to the Sun and Morning Star, and the Sun in Alchemy symbolically represents Gold and Sol. The gold symbol is a circle with a dot in the middle of the circle. It also looks like a circumpoint. In the mysteries, the Isis/Demeter, Cybele, Osiris/Dionysus, and Horus/Mithras were interested in psychedelic drugs and going into the entheogen dimension. The Road to Eleusis argues that the mysteries of Isis/Demeter were probably based on psychedelic compounds derived from ergot, a parasitic fungus that grows on cereal grains. The third eye vision manifests during a trance state.
Three Body Sirius
| Someone on Tik-Tok took a video capture of three moons [forget a fictional three body – we have our own] explains why eclipses are always ahead of its supposed time |
There is a case to be made that people may get Gnosticism wrong – the gnostic texts were found during an interesting geopolitical time and only hit the mainstream at the same time the C.I.A and Rockefeller were at their high point concerning their defunct new age enterprise (examined in psychedelics). And with the Gnostics, we have a perennial obsession- an uncontrollable obsession with our origins and our interstellar home – and very few things describe the quest of our shadowy Atlantis elite as much as the alien bloodline quest.
Gnostics’ obsession with our origins is fundamental; the search for the Alien God is what defines them, but Alien God alludes to the Astro part of Gnosticism, which is akin to hyperreal cosmology (astro-Gnosticism) – which deludes that fundamental idea because they swapped heavenly dimensions with hyperrealism planets it’s a movement from earth to another earth-like planet; you typically haven’t gone anywhere. We know there is a difference between atheist/science ascents for transformation to be god-like versus the search for gnosis. It is fundamental that they feel the world is alien to them – the experience of the world as an alien place into which man has strayed and from which he must find a way back home to the other world/dimension (alluding to Pleroma) of his origin.
| “Who has cast me into the suffering of this world?” asks the “Great Life” of the gnostic texts, which is also the “first, alien Life from the worlds of light. Therefore the question, “Who conveyed me into the evil darkness?” and the entreaty, “Deliver us from the darkness of this world into which we are flung.” The world is no longer the well-ordered, the cosmos, in which Hellenic man felt at home; nor is it the Judaeo-Christian world that God created and found good. Gnostic man no longer wishes to perceive in admiration the intrinsic order of the cosmos.” Eric Vogelin’s |
Gnosticism’s meta-physics imparts faith in an “alien” or “hidden” God who comes to man’s aid, sends him his messengers, and shows him the way out of the prison of the evil God of this world. Eric Vogelin alludes to having faith in some other hidden god, not the one that sent the protagonist to evil darkness, but the one that delivered him. One might assume Yahweh or another mirror creator god, but that’s not true. Vogelin implies that this hidden God is Yahweh (also to separate Yahweh and the Demiurge), and as such, he got the attention of right-wing Christians. This implication gave them an excuse to misrepresent Gnosticism erroneously.
This kind of error is not typical of the Christian religion but is also found in an atheist/science model. Three body problem writers declare Science is superior to mysticism, where a scene that purposes math is superior to the I-ching, which is divination. In the first post, we determined that there is no such thing as space-time in the hyperreal sense, but there is a notion of time-fate. Math has many inconsistencies if its proposition is wrong, as examined in Terrence Howard’s proof that 1×1=2. Or, in the TV show Sheldon, realising Zero doesn’t exist, which questions the credibility of physics and maths. The I-ching, however, imparts the physical phenomenon in form and from its interaction against this physical phenomenon to the pressures and fluctuations of change (vis a vee wind, landmark topographies, etc.) over time. Everything arises in the context of time. You can then make closer predictions in [correct] mathematical language than one that is hyperreal.
The new-atheist movement was a tool to suppress a movement of awakening (a tangent ideal of Gnosticism, a sort of hyper-Gnosticism) that began post-9/11. Heavily varies streams of thought coming from various Christian movements – from truthers that emerge in radio talk circles of Alex Jones to conspiracy theories of David Icke. The new atheist movements were a resistance against irrationality seeping into the managerial class. From the academic scene to upper-middle-class positions in the NGO institutes, they carefully executed shame on the opposing class. It was Puritan shaming and part of its subset formed into woke-ism. On the other hand, its opposition was these truther movements, Christian millennialism, conspiracy-theorists, flat-earthers, etc. – who had the fundamental qualities of a gnostic worldview but were not exact in its execution because they were resistant to classical Gnosticism. This is a confusing paradox: believing in God while accepting a scientific cosmology that was brought about through sorcery that, over time, strips away the god-head.
The same kind of interplexing paradox in Christians criticizing perennial philosophy, notably how it imports pagan meta-physics – to postmodernism is an offset of neo-Marxist ideology (which is false). And any critics against that are merely showcasing the behaviour of Narcissism of small differences. Now it seems the Daily Wire club of right-leaning conservatives claim Gnosticism is Marxist also (Picard slaps hand to his forward moment). They’re drawing from Vogelin, who folded everything into Gnosticism which included totalitarianism movements, communism and Nazism; it’s completely biased and often has a wrong outlook. He was not familiar with the Nag Hammadi texts alongside Hermeticism. Gnosticism was never utopian, if anything else the opposite of that, nor is it political. Jordan Peterson’s Critique of postmodernism is wrong (explained in Post 39). The Marxists have the demented utopianists idealogue, not the Gnostics.
James Lindsey, known for his trickster grievance studies 101, claims that Marxists inverted Hegelianism (by making this inversion claim is an inversion claim on to itself) to support a gnostic ideal (that Gnosticism is Marxism) is an erroneous psychologism of the highest abstract. In the 19th century, thinkers were downstream from Hegel; in actuality, Gnosticism informed Hegelian thinking. There is no secret clandestine intellectual society lineage moving from the Gnostics to Hegel and down to Marx’s. It’s unfounded and fictional. Gnosticism has strong existential vibes so that it can overlap with existential thinkers. It doesn’t make them gnostic; it’s more nuanced than that. People must get rid of claims of resentment seeping from postmodernism and Gnosticism. The lineage of gnostic cults in history were not war mongers like right-wing Christianity. They were cheerful and overall good.
They have a limited contextual base regarding a better synthesis of understanding because they have an agenda; they are obfuscating postmodernity and Gnosticism while shadow-projecting their demonic thought forms. It parallels a tangent neo-Gnostic framework where they feel archons are jealous of our creative capacities. Jealous of our life functions, and they seek to trap and control us. They have an image or label of postmodernism and Gnosticism but do not have referent or reference; they have incorrect orders of abstraction or want to add false-to-fact abstractions. If they can grasp quality and experience with self, thereby gaining consciousness and memory, they would realise it’s not in Gnosticism but in reality. They would also realise the Archons of our time are inverting everything.
In certain belief systems, the attainment of spiritual enlightenment or Christ-consciousness through divine knowledge is believed to be a privilege exclusively reserved for Christ. Christians, who aspire to achieve this profound spiritual connection, are forbidden from doing so and can only approach it through their faith in Christ. This gives rise to a communication style that is strict and inflexible, where those who strive to experience the divine are unable to, while those who can only imagine it are barred from accessing it. This frustration has become obvious to the far right religion that needs to blame those that can access such transformative experiences into postmodernity and Gnosticism. This frustration must be channelled somewhere, and so it was repackaged with utilitarian means and instrumental reasoning adding a layer of intrigue to the study or debate; inverted or otherwise on religiosity.
| Jesus teaches us | Be in the world but not of it | |||
| Gnostic ontology | I am in the world but not of the world |
Central to our discussion is the gatekeeping effect of setting criteria. This effect becomes particularly concerning when we consider the conservative right, which has its roots in a protestant alchemical movement. Once characterized by protest fervour, this movement is now taking on a reactionary character. Bruno, a cult martyr and sorcerer, was instrumental in this narrative. He propagated a dying or false cosmology, envisioning a romantic ideal where the soul is freed from a central confinement to an infinite one. However, this vision can be seen as either complacent or inadvertently supporting an inverted master plan that is as Archonic; parallel to its Church adversaries.
.
.
