Mystics & Artist-Prophets:
Superpowers – Blavatsky Chooses Heaven over the Earth: Blavatsky is one of these [artist-mystics] elites that can bring down the spirits to earth. She was beyond your average spiritualist of that time especially surrounding New York. She was a magician rather than a medium – she didn’t allow her body to be used as a tool for messaging between the spirit worlds. She was instead commanding the spirits and making these things happen.
She continued to work by the end of her life; Blavatsky, however, had fallen victim to a cancel culture of her time alongside being portrayed as a plagiariser and charlatan, but those remarks didn’t faze her all that much. A particular friend became resentful of Blavatsky’s success; her friend gave some letters outlining how they would hoodwink people to some Christian missionary magazine. What did bother her was being rumoured to be a Russian spy. Blavatsky wasn’t dependent on their family’s money. She had always earned her keep by being a magazine writer or creating her own ink business – she had a progressive or blue-collar mindset. She’s the opposite of someone like Crowley, who was dependent on family’s money, a position whose likeness engulfed upper-class capitalistic fervour – she neither delved into these types of hand-outs nor (sexual) ritual debaucheries.
Today, debaucheries (in the form of abuse, rape and harassment) are made public through allegations implicating anyone high in authority from politicians and celebrities, and as we discussed in the last post concerning our fondness for the arts in particular pop/rock/hip-hop/r&b songs are not made by the familiar artist you thought you knew, but by an embedded spirit in the form of an old man. Of course, the old man in Under the Silver Lake parallels the Matrix’s Architect, a personification of the Demiurge.
The protagonist is Sam, played by Andrew Garfield, who is also Spiderman. In the comics/animation series, Spiderman meets the Madame Web, the weaver of multi-dimensional planes. In a way, Sam, who meets the old man, is also the weaver type insofar as he has come to the end of his universe, and he got their following or weaving together synchronistic clues. The quiet symbol (to be silent) he followed in the film suggests that a hyperreal infinitude universe is false; the quiet symbol is a male version of the infinite symbol. The heliocentric model is supposed to evolve the systems Rosicrucians laid out in many ways. They are similar, apart from many aspects one being infinity and the hyperreal space. Hence, it’s a quiet symbol to be ‘quiet about it” – noting the finger over the lips signifying a Luciferian symbolic nod.
The embedded old man is a symbolic subconscious suggestion that implies your imaginative faculty can be controlled. We also concluded this is a fallacy because intuition and imagination are like water in a vast ocean, purely a natural force too large to grasp and control. And even if you tried, we can see this analogy in the sea of algorithmic [adaptive] information where data are collected to be dispensed for market value – this is a type of control over our minds. However, given how water is fungible, your intuition and imagination are also fluid – and given how intuition works in real-time as a function of need in a limited time. Jung states:
Intuition seeks to discover possibilities in the objective situation – It also an instrument which, in the presence of a hopelessly blocked situation, works automatically towards the issue, which no other function could discover
The old man represent Control, and in Star Trek discovery season two the main antagonist was Control an artificial intelligence – in Stargate we have the replicaters. In both examples their function is to be an allegorical representation for authoritarian and dominance. Our problem stems from our symbiotic relationship with [information/other] technology that permits or integrates our intuition with civilisation, but has limits concerning our affairs. For the moment this is not how it’s envisioned because the conspiratorial notion that’s it’s going to overrun us is too high in that these technocratic elites is going to succeed with their enterprise of transferring consciousness to A.I adaptive machines. It’s a conflict between reality and the way we pretend to manage reality. We can break away from this approach towards a defeatist future if we build a space for our intuition to exist. We start by limiting the romanticism of conspiratorial appeal towards managers of perception.
There is also a clear difference between A.I adaptive behaviours and intuitive acts, Jung’s notion of inherited thought patterns is contrasted against A.I Adaptive behaviours – and that is A.I go nowhere because the collective unconscious cannot be derived from ones and zeros. Thought patterns require a bio-genetic component integrating biology and technology, which can only be accurate in fiction. The mineral and the bio are external components that feed data to machines, including A.I in computers, these are the facts bound to rationality for the moment, and maybe forever, meaning unchangeable.
In the Tree of Life, Intuition is Binah or Saturn, and it’s no surprise Binah is also known as the Great Sea or the Mother Supernal. Saturn is also a [celestial] gateway. What it all points to is that intuition is like a delivery system for Gnosis or the spark for the divine. And we know that Sophia recognised in her [progeny] mistake in the form of the Demiurge [creator-God], who creates a material world despite his banishment. She confessed her sin to the other lights of the Aeons, and then she implanted seeds of divinity from the source that would grow into her mistake’s creation. Having had this infusion, they can now escape from the torture of life on earth. Of course, there are distinctions between gnostic groups, especially among Sethian and Valentian. One [Sethian] sees the creator as a wilful or [Satanic] creator, while Valentian sees Him as merely imperfect and acting out of ignorance. The words of Christ are the word of Gnosis – we know the Greek for Gnosis is knowledge [divine knowledge] that is saved.
Regarding Blavatsky and her intuition, it is clear that she possessed extensive textual knowledge and a solid common sense understanding. This means she was adept at analytic and rational thought with the precise instrumental structures below reason. Blavatsky demonstrated the ability to explore the astral plane by focusing her concentration. It is essential to recognise that she had a unique psychological insight, which can be described as a “superpower.” While she was indeed “talented,” this is evident in her ability to integrate her skills with a doctrine that paralleled her interests in materialistic science, all while navigating the challenges posed by the solid Christian theology of her time. She did not react defensively to these challenges but often anticipated and addressed scientific ideas before they became main-stream.
Although Blavatsky’s first focus was on the Western Esoteric Tradition with deep familiarity with Hermeticism, Kabbalah, and Masonry, her first book, Isis Unveiled [1877], is a long, discursive study of these themes. She had beaten the scientist to the punch because she had already immersed herself in these Western traditions. For example, the esoteric notion found in the Secret Doctrine:
The Eternity of the Universe in toto as a boundless plane … ‘the playground of numberless Universes incessantly manifesting and disappearing.’ – Blavatsky
Through Blavatsky’s statement, you can see where hyperreal science [scientism] invokes an infinite universe. As we know, astronomy and physics are quantifying universe language based on maths. Still, it’s a debasement on natural science as astronomy-physics [and hyperreal-space] is all but theoretical, professing itself as fact. Blavatsky’s quote is far more ambiguous – it’s more about how behind these [planets] planes lies an Absolute “an Omnipresent. Eternal, Boundless, and Immutable Principle,” – which manifests in dual form, as “Spirit” and “Matter”; the interplay of these two forces causes all things to be.
Dee and Bruno imparted a less evolved interpretation of the universe that was later refined through heliocentric academics. The Aristotelian model had to be discarded in favour of misaligning our centre. It was a spell crafted on materialistic pseudo-celestial language to dispel the spirit and prop up sub-atomic particles to act like cosmic solar systems or vice versa. Of course, this inference came from Blavatsky’s abstract; her notion did not discard the soul or cosmic gods that abstract is about involution and evolution. Of course, evolutionists borrowed from this concept. She states: “All of existence is taking part in the enormous cycle of descent of Spirit into Matter and its eventual return to the bosom of the Absolute.
I’ve stated that it might have been a mistake for her to combine occult traditions with the emerging materialistic science of her time, which became more pseudo in our present time. The pseudo would streamline aspects of physics (meta-physics), astrophysics, astronomy, and evolution; that’s not to say all these subjects have no relation to truth. Instead, they’re like a subset of subjects that are inferior regarding an esoteric past but may have a better fit in modernity when building rationality for facts. These subset subjects, however, have an imperfection in the process in which they identify themselves as factual or non-fiction but inherently proceed to become more fiction but unrecognised within traditional myth or even meta-fiction (apocryphal truths).
Blavatsky would not have predicted this imperfection. Nevertheless, she had the imagination to keep the fluidity of competing abstracts of that time. She had imagined the other and placed herself within their language, and from those competing swirling forces, she could conceive her place within the whole. Henri Bergson, an early-twentieth advocate for intuition, reinforces this idea with his quote:
We Grasp at the same time how the two are opposed and how they are reconciled. – Henri Bergson
In this form of imagining the whole, she must decide and act—it’s an action that is not rational, beyond common sense (or shared knowledge), and free of memory. This is the intuitive act. You can also say it’s that gnostic spark, the gift given from Sophia [wisdom], trying to grasp where it is and where it wants to be.
As Eastern tradition found itself on the waning end of popularity, at the same time Western conventional Christianity was on the back foot of a rising materialistic science, she repackaged the rejected Western tradition of esoteric occult knowledge and the philosophy of Hermeticism, Kabala, and Rosicrucianism. Alongside her trip to India, she popularised a version of Eastern tradition in the West.
The secret groups that flourished in Bavaria, like Rosicrucianism and Illuminati, were Protestant groups in protest against the Jesuits of the time. It has become, in the modern West, at least among Christian Conspiracy Circles –organisations that are part of a worldwide conspiracy. Not only did these secret groups last until the eighteenth century, but they were also formulations made famous in the late 90s when gaining truth became like a romantic hero’s journey. This scapegoating or blame-shifting ran superfluous as the question of whether the fraternity existed [especially Rosicrucianism] – like an earnest lawyer ready to impart guilt when empirical and actual doubt is prominent; the truth cannot be buried. However, according to researchers, ‘yes’ Rosicrucian fraternities existed [although they only have the three Confessio Pamphlets as evidence]. However, modern Rosicrucians have no direct link to any early secret Rosicrucian society of the early seventeenth century. [Richard Smoley said just because there is no proof does not mean there is no link].
It became an entertaining pastime as most accusations couldn’t hold the truth. In modernity, this CFCT and traditional Christians only show their hand in contradictions. Perhaps it was a product of time; the awareness of a Globalized New World Order now in collapse needed to attach itself to the villain role, and because most of the enthusiasm came from fundamentalist Christians, the villain must have an esoteric or occult link. Their religiosity of Christendom and reason for existence is because of the protestant Christian enterprise. Their villain is responsible for their existence. The protestant Christian enterprise was also in protest of the Church, which CFCT also despised. Today, we know not to rely on these demoralised Christians, easy to manipulate, Lacking discernment, unable to detach them-selves from agenda-driven Network News, prone to follow or hero-worship a demagogue – unaware of a fascist movement on their doorstep urged on by their own demoralisation.
Intellectuals have all indicated that being vulnerable to a demagogue was the symptom or consequence that has been plaguing America’s marginalised population for quite a long time. Their ignorance is beyond ridiculous as most of their knowledge is derived from memes, often short-lived, biased and propaganda-based. The difference between memes and archetypes has never been so significant to recognise. Modern propaganda in the political landscape on both sides, seen through a top-down hierarchy, indicates a Navy Militancy and military-industrial alongside an intelligence agency with the national security running the show over governance and billionaires. Yet all institutions seemingly aligned regarding astrology, rituals and star magic) are highly informed by their paid sibyls, oracles, and guides – on the reassurance that the stars comfort them and that the gods are backing their particular righteous cause. There is a strange parallel among the ruling elites and accelerationism for civilisation to fall through technology and governance matches Christian fundamentalist bemusement on their Christian apocalyptic end time; for both it needs to happen.
Blavatsky and Theosophy were consolidated within a Christian conspiracy setting stemming from the same reactive conspiratorial concern. Often regulated to subjects discussing occult philosophy and magical spiritual Western traditions have many associations or influences from Rosicrucians. Even in that case, you would have to make the connections between every initiated and non-initiated Globalist member and what they hold in a metaphysical sense. Masonry is not Rosicrucianism, although it mimics the same or a variation of initiation path. Blavatsky said that members of Rosicrucianism must study a scheme of initiation into the Kabbalah and higher magic of the Western or hermetic type. Often, there was a substantial membership test with two-thirds failing upon trial because she said, “the Rosy-Crux becomes and is not made” – meaning, you have to put a lot of effort before entry to the membership. In other words, there needs to be a prerequisite for superpowers.
It’s like assuming the culprit’s likeness for a particular song in contrast to each different religiosity, so, therefore, you must be part of a worldwide agenda even though you’re far apart and your only link is in likeness to religiosity or to a particular song. Top religions are similar but never really follow the same method. This reactive concern may be caused by past Rosicrucian and Theosophical members taking what they learnt and particularising it to their own ideological, often fantastical sect. This is a concern that these masters may not have envisioned for their students. Writers like Baily, Cowley, Hubbard, etc., are examples that can cause concern.
After Blavatsky passed away, theosophy would become splinted, and the concern made about theosophy is apparent, but made after her death. By this time, the society had been splintered into several groups. And you can determine that Blavatsky, with her intuition and unmatched imagination, would not have approved or followed such a debasement to her work. Remember, she had consolidated Occult magical philosophy with its emphasis on the imagination/intuition alongside cosmic mapping (an Illuminati heliocentric cosmology & evolution of her time), and Eastern mysticism has a particularity on establishing old grounds made new – alongside her intuition, imagination, and emotions produced a new set ideas and thoughts. By this alone, it’s clear she chooses heaven over the earth.
Superpowers – The Search for the Vril Force via Blood, Sugar, and Sex-Magic: This debasement to her work would lean into a modern concern related to an “esoteric agenda.” Theosophy was not helped by a German secret society named Vril, founded at the end of the First World War – whose members were known to be part of the Nazi regime. A dark fellowship of members that wanted to achieve the mastery of the Aryan race – of course, before these members became part of Vril, the society was about Aryan power but had nothing to do with any Nazi white/race ideology. Nevertheless, the methods in which Vril ran things garnered the attention of the Nazis. It ranged from political assassinations by invoking the spirit of the dead to sexual rituals and sacrifices.
There is an obsession with an intangible power force called “Vril.” This power was said to be a universal force that can heal and extend superpowers’ likeability. In many ways, a parallel spiritual concept of Prana or Chi, and it’s understood they could harness this energy force, and gaining it would also grant them the ability to acquire material power. They first used sex magic rituals as a means to find this force – this carnal method of trying to harness Vril didn’t have the effect they wanted. It did influence a nationwide coitus program of infidelity in which an increased population size was developed to make for the loss of soldiers in the war. They believed children were closer links to spiritual forces and saw them as gateways to the astral world. As a result, marginalized kids from the edges of Bavarian society “suddenly” started to disappear.
Of course, we know Vril came from a science-fiction novel, “The Coming Race” – Edgar Burroughs wrote this concept. The books describe an underground race named Vrilya, who completely masters the Vril (electro-fluid) force. It was science fiction, but it is derived from a symmetrical aspect of fiction, meta-fiction, which you would find in Apocryphal texts. Its apparent elements of Nazi ideology stem from Burroughs Vril’s novel – the superior race in connection with the Aryan race manifested in the Nazi mindset. From here, the Vril society was born, ranging from a collection of occultists and High German-ranking nationalists to an inner circle called “the all-German Society for Meta-Physics” in short, the Vril-Society.
Founders of the Vril, one in particular, adopted a messiah complex as one went by John the Baptist – John being the first template of the true messiah to come. A saviour complex where they believed they alone could save a country – they involved female mediums in their groups tasked with uncovering occult truths and harvesting Vril. They foresaw a dark shadow, a leader who would wear the name of Fuhrer, a megalomaniac who would lead the country. This leader would eventually be part of the inner circle, although he would see it only as a tool to give him rise as an established leader. Aside from that, it was the introduction of Jorg Lanzvon Liebenfels, whose concept and writings of the debased version of Theosophy known as Ariosophy that instilled this (anti-Semitic) propaganda to the world.
Between 1888 and the 1920s, it was a time of secret societies and spiritualism spreading throughout Europe. Mystics like Blavatsky had an impact with her prolific work that would later be centred on Theosophy (a combination of science and religion). Liebenfels misconstrued her notion of a superior Aryan race as a propaganda piece. Her Aryan race was centred on the Indo-Aryan race, meaning Noble, which evolved further spiritually than other races. By this time, it was too late. The misrepresentation took hold. It is said the secret doctrine had sold more copies in Germany. The Nazi regime even followed Blavatsky’s quest by travelling to Tibet as they believed the Aryan forefathers were deep under the Himalayan Mountains. They found out that this enterprise, one of many, would weaken the country’s finances. Nonetheless, they acquired something from the country, the Tibetan Swastika symbol, and imposed a debasement on the original imagery while appointing their new meaning onto it.
This was a time of secret societies; many dissipated, and some became subsets. Its well-known project paper clip was established where groups of Nazi scientists had a get a jail-free card for establishing the needs of the CIA. The Nazis had their own UFO project establishing a nuts-and-bolt version of flying saucers. America saw itself as wanting to reach space, and this would lead to the Rocket program that Jack Parsons had a hand in. Parsons had associations with Crowley. Both were part of a sex cult. This project leans into the practical side of a subset version of that alchemical dream that the Illuminati Council had established in heliocentrism – this time, the practical side of that dream would come to fruition – the idea to conquer space became real.
Superpowers – The Hyperreal Cosmos Meme-Math Magic: We’ve established that Blavatsky is a magician with psychic abilities and profound knowledge and intuition – although she wasn’t inherently prophetic, she was more mystical and practical. It’s helpful in terms of what she had put down on paper. Blavatsky seems among the last non-members yet deeply inspirational among the Illuminati Council that laid out the cosmology and anthropology that are universally revered and still seen today (the heliocentric cosmos).
What can be folded into this Illuminati Council that redefined the current cosmology from flat land to a spherical one started from Bruno’s psychedelic assumption that stars are Suns, basically, at the death end of the alchemical dream and beginnings of Rosicrucian movements who had the desire to bring about a religious, moral and social revolution based on hermetic philosophy. The Rosicrucian movement is a re-emergence of the same alchemical dream that died but was made new in a different order. Still, it was not founded by Hermeticism this time but through Bruno’s false assumption, a protestant subset. It would instigate a Galileo worldview that will last until to this day – this subset became more materialistic science and more masonic. The world became about spheres, planets, solar systems, and galaxies – and in modernity, black holes, galaxies, and dark matter, the heavens became (a hyperreal) space. The current worldview has come to realise this subset’s apparent malarkey dysfunction, which is counterintuitive to actual science.
Aside from semantic details regarding flatness, curvature, transfixed Earth vs. rotating Earth, the star-constellation & celestial movement, etc., the spirit’s main ascendance to higher forms of monads is in parallel. This notion of infinity is the first fundamental proposition or spell that was enchanted. In a hyperreal space model, they had to dislodge Earth’s universal centre and swap it with the sun.
The Rosicrucian methodology still took most of its ideas from Aristotelian Physics 300 centuries before Christ. The Aristotelian universe is about structuring the cosmos into concentric spheres with the earth at the centre. The Kabbalah system was also about spheres, though more of an internal approach. At around the same time (give or take a century), there was Mesopotamia of Alexandra/Agora, a mathematician who had tackled the question of the earth/sun centre of the universe. The film starring Rachel Weisz called Agora suggests she did do so. Of course, there is no proof of this. There are only indicators towards the fact. Ptolemy heavily influenced Hypatia and Eratosthenes’s works. Her work, which entails a review of Appolonius on Conics (about circles and eclipses), also edited a new edition of Ptolemy’s Algemist, which indicates she would have at least approached the idea.
The film imparted she came up with the elliptical orbits through a moment of clarity upon looking at the conics (geometries that can be derived from the cone). Still, that information would’ve been available to begin with. So can a parabola (u-shaped curve), which is a ball’s path, describe when you throw it? Put the Sun at the centre of the Solar System, and suddenly, you can use the same basic ideas to describe motion anywhere in it. Once elliptical orbits were proposed in the seventeenth century, progress in motion study followed quickly. In the film, this revolutionary possibility is represented by Hypatia doing experiments by dropping a sack from the mast of a moving ship. However, this experiment is merely about forces (f=mv2/f=mv2/r), linear, and angular speeds. Angular speeds allow dropping a sack from the mast of a moving ship the possibility of moving earth when it combines speed and momentum. The transfixed quality of the world is still present; the ship does not suddenly become the earth.
Math is not reality; math is a language; “the things we assume to be true in math are called axioms, and a hypothesis we come up with isn’t more likely to be true if it better explains or predicts what we observe. Instead, it’s true because we say it is,” For example, one can create an equation where an elephant can hang on to a cliff holding on to a single branch, and math can say this is possible; reality knows better, though. Math can be derived in many ways to show something – the illusion of truth or truth, depending on your beliefs. – Vsauce, “How to count past Infinity (video).”
How does one measure something unmeasurable? They do it by building collections or languages of things. Also, by thinking of infinity as a set size of numbers and comparing infinity to other infinities, you do it by taking a size set and putting a number on it; each set size is known as cardinality (Georg Cantor method). This method eventually gets to a point where set theory must ask: can there be a universe of all-sets when there are no sets of all-sets? They add additional axioms but are bounded by a too-large set (infinity without measure so large it’s immeasurable even in standard AI/quantifying computer level). So, they make a cut-off point and measure only more minor things.
In philosophical terms, trying to measure the reach of God from the backdrop of their infinity hypothesis is impossible. Astro-Gnostics answered this problem by advocating the centre of the hyperreal universe is the entrance or the Pleroma. Trying to pass our stratosphere is also impossible. So you enclose it, or you flatten it. You get to a place where infinity can be measured only at a microcosm level. If any underlining data or math is still left over from the hyperreal, you can use the Cantor method to eliminate unwanted infinities.
The certainty of continuum hypotheses (possible sizes of infinite sets) is that they will never be realised, and you will never know whether they are true or false. The hypotheses are not sufficient enough to know one way or the other. A scene in Agora where the Roman stewards were scattering to save scrolls and books and the amounts of data they had accumulated regarding astronomy bear no significance. Astronomy/Astrophysics have become or always been, but not realised due to the misconceptions of that era; nonetheless, pseudoscience now and has always been.
| Rose and the Cross | ||||
| Nicolaus Copernicus | Formulated the Copernican principle – that said the earth and human beings cannot possibly be in the privilege position in the universe. | |||
| Giordano Bruno | Stars are just like other Suns | |||
| Galileo Galilei | Pushed the idea of Heliocentrism | |||
| Johannes Kepler | Came up with mathematical laws of planetary motion | |||
| Isaac Newton | Came up with Gravity | |||
| Christiaan Huygens | Calculated through proposed axiom the distance from earth to the Sun | |||
When I discuss folding the Rosicrucians into the Illuminati Council, I refer to this new emergence of the dead alchemical dream that Dee initiated. A protestant subset of the Rosicrucian order involved gathering these renascence thinkers and gestating a seed of doubt that would grow ever more sophisticated in their mathematical language. That lasted through the Reformation, into the Enlightenment, and then to modernity. Bruno and Newton gave more credence to other works, such as Bruno’s geometry of language and Newton’s work on enneagrams. They are still part of this subset.
A subset that influenced other thinkers into the modern fray, only to come up to a dead end or, in mathematical terms, a cut-off point, meaning the circuit of return comes rushing back to its source. Centuries of data are gained, and nothing definitive is answered because nothing in their field uses the scientific method. They use leaps of logic or guesswork. Having seeded that doubt for five hundred centuries and engrained in our memories and genetics, the need to disenchant the demoralised on their alchemical spell will take work and persistence. The backlash would ultimately be about questioning the topography of the earth but ultimately about upholding the death ropes of a redefined alchemical Protestant dream.
The implication is that this must be a Jesuit Plot. However, given that Father George Lemaitre, a Jesuit priest, came up with the Big Bang Theory, this is an unlikely claim. They are all in it together. During the Reformation, there was an endeavour to implement a heliocentric view, but the Jesuit contributions came after the re-emergence of the dead alchemical dream made new in the Illuminati Council of the Rose and the Cross—now, in modern scientism.
From here on end, there is an attempt to grasp magical thinking with quantification and mathematics, which leads to nowhere because magic/mysticism and science should not mix; alchemists knew that’s why they had categorical subjects within the alchemical workings (the lab; the spirit, and the psychology). They should not mix, but is there room for intuition in science? There is since animism is a great defender of science and science for animism – that is, if science stops bedding with scientism.
| Masonic | ||||
| Father; George Lemaitre | Came up with the Big Bang Theory | |||
| Henry Cavendish | Came up with the mass and weight of the earth | |||
| Max Plank | Originator of Quantum theory | |||
| Albert Einstein | Came up with relativity and the bending of space-time | |||
| Lawrence Krauss, Michio Kaku (string theory), Steven Hawking, Richard Feynman, Max Bourne, Dawkins, etc. | ||||
Mathematics and sciences are designed to explain the reality of hyperrealism and are made towards your conscious reality to lock you down. While mainstream religion locks down your subconscious, God being the infinite all there is which can be seen as the allegory for your subconscious. Making the conscious the finite and the subconscious the infinite, where both finite/ infinite subconscious are sold back to you by these elite managers of perception. Mathematics has an artistic quality to it; it’s just sometimes engendered towards an agenda, and just like the entertainment business, there is a balance between the imaginative commitment and their grant holders.
Hermetic understanding equates planetary divinities with lineages of their chain of being from the celestial world down to the material world, like the Sun’s connection to Gold and all the other planets. So, when you look at the phenomenal world, you start to see things from that perspective. You begin to see these divine lineages working or weaving through material reality. If you want to work with a divine form, choose its extensions into this world. In order to truly grasp it, you need to take your position that’s been dislodged back to the centre.
Blavatsky once said: “the progressive development of everything, Even Atoms, is taught.” Even atoms are taught to fold in the quantum world. She meant that the unknown is the source of knowledge where she is being taught (something out there is giving her these sensory informative perceptions) alongside her development of consciousness. This is significant because it matches the same processes as these mathematicians when they come up with their truths. This means people with spiritual access can develop the same spiritual truths; Blavatsky gave the methods to reach these spiritual processes. In the secret doctrine, she proposed three fundamental axioms:
| One – there is an absolute reality beyond our conditioning or ability to think about it (beyond comparison). A state of immutability a state of independence towards the other – or in other words a centre of poise, mystics also describe it as a god-hood beyond God. Two – The absolute universality of the love periodicity, of flux and reflux, (wax and wane) ebb and flow, which physical science has observed and recorded in all departments of nature. It’s about the cyclical nature of things, death and rebirth, the rise and fall of civilisations, etc. Three – The obligatory pilgrimage for every Soul – a spark of the Universal Over-Soul – through the cycle of Incarnation (or “Necessity”) in accordance with Cyclic and Karma law. It’s about transcending the self (experiencing life in a separate form) – the soul in me is the reflection of this universal principal in my body. That reflection is the principle; the awareness of unity, and through raising your consciousness you become aware of the whole. The spirit must than experience separateness in order recognise I am from I am the whole. We can escape the cycle of incarnation when we realise the truth of our nature which is the truth of the universe. |
Blavatsky’s intuitive ability is like a grandmaster chess player who can imagine several moves ahead and extrapolate from each opponent’s reactionary move. She may not have folded all the defragmented spells of material science and scientism, only those that are partial to magical understanding.
.
To be continued …
