Normal Behaviour in an Apocalyptic World:
Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies –Transhumanism as a Cult Religion & its Limitations: Transhumanism came out of the ideal of technocracy and managerialism, where the idea that expertise and management have an enlightenment component that would propel empire and state. This idea would be the moral justification for the empire, especially towards the height of the British Empire with its fleets of ships. It told itself they were better at running or managing things, and in this enlightenment idea, the saying ‘the white men’s burden’ was put in motion. It stripped away other people’s culture and how they viewed themselves in that era by defining it as inferior because they had the light and were technologically superior. Furthermore, this erroneous idea of things getting better through our enlightenment enterprise steers itself to a specific future – a direction upwards. It underpins any of these systems that ever improve towards a utopia it’s underneath Marxism, socialism, technocracy, corporatism, and transhumanism. – Runesoup.com A.I podcast
Managerialism the belief that management is superior over the inferior, where they are always correct and, therefore, can manage people who are not as good or intelligent. Technocracy refers to a system of governance where the decision-makers are chosen based on their technical and scientific expertise. Both are limited by their false belief system and the inability to update themselves due to a structure that celebrates or justifies narcissism towards people in a position of influence and power. Transhumanism grew out of that limitation: “You must be wrong because you’re not an expert; therefore, I’m right because I wear the white coat.” With no room for flexibility, it continues to grow, and errors pile up. As a society, we learned to live with it as part of reality because nothing was there to counter the idea. – Runesoup.com A.I podcast
Transhumanism is embedded in a belief system of empire and can simultaneously be a religious cult, as you might find in Mithraism within an established (Roman) empire. Therefore, transhumanism will subtly encapsulate itself within the processes of a technocratic environment, such as those who want to administer the whole planet, which are your Trilaterals, Brzezinski, the Rockafellas, etc. What was once described as elites on a mission for a New World Order (or centralisation), not technically devotees of a secret cult. Just administrators that think they can govern our world and are the best ones to do it. This is what has replaced the self-identified left thinking in the West. Submission to the technocratic superior managers and from the 80s to now, this is what centre left is. This is what the leftists have mistaken for reality, and a reality worth defending – implementing a G7-run technocracy around the planet (New World Order and the Great Reset) stems from this idea. – Runesoup.com A.I podcast
In the previous post, we discussed the hopeful wish of the technocratic elite’s expectation of a singularity moment that will birth self-awareness for artificial intelligence. At this point, we will validate a transhumanism program or agenda to transfer human consciousness to a robotic body or a simulated environment of their making. However, it will never happen due to certain facts and limitations. An imbalance would be made clear or inevitably become apparent in the form of questions: why do you believe in the breath of God, giving life, a seemingly supernatural in its meta-fiction approach, but yet can’t believe artificial intelligence that it will one day be self-aware? Furthermore, extending the question in a postmodern time, in the belief that consensus reality might be holographic.
Meta-fiction’s other is fiction and non-fiction’s other is fiction; moreover, it starts at a centre point and projects outwards as opposed to a triangular system; the centre point is our fractal reality. This means there is still a separation; we can pull things from the other through our imaginings within the philosophy discussion, whether about a holographic world or something else. The Apocalyptic idea is postmodern in that we are stripping away the simulated lies or the holographic lens and revealing greater truths. Transhumanism invokes fictional ideas in non-fictional settings, and its materialism; you can’t act as if science fiction is real and rational due to non-fiction’s limitations or inherent logic. And it’s in the limitations that will separate understanding, the complexity of technology and philosophy.
Transhumanism is a religious cult that goes against its own logic and religion that has limitations; it also mythologises itself backwards. It’s a poor substitute for something grander or more established, which is broader in scope, whether in myth or archetypes – like the epic of Gilgamesh or Prometheus and Faust. The Epic of Gilgamesh is a quest for physical immortality on the material plane. Transhumanism uses it as a preface to motivate their religion and transhumanism goal. However, Gilgamesh as an archetype is also filled with much more about the human condition, especially death and heroism. They are sophisticated hyperdimensional living stories that you can step inside and learn things about reality – as opposed to a notion of swapping consciousness into an external technological device, which is an error in thought.
Mystics like Chadin, who proposed the omega point that the ultimate goal of the universe is evolving to greater complexity in consciousness, are drawn to this ultimate point in unity as a cosmic singularity. This omega point is the hyperreal material notion of the Big Bang but reversed. In my “resist the evidence in satellization,” post, I argued that you must throw away any idea of hyperreal space (or materialism regarding space including gravity) as evidence. Due to the fact those evidence are all lies, which mean quantum mechanics are met with limitations when compared or blown up into cosmic dimensions. So, stop associating quantum mechanics with gravity in hopes of understanding black holes (singularities) and the Big Bang theory and their hyperreal notions. Therefore, you can focus more on quantum mechanics [of the nuclear] and the molecular micro-model of genetic code. At this point, gravity is excluded from its theoretical association, which is free to determine other factors.
Even if you continue viewing hyperreal-space as truth, which is part of the Catholic religion, given how they instigated a heliocentric worldview, It makes Transhumansim Catholic or Christian in some sense because of that same evolutional goal. The hyperreal is a 500-year-old secular goal embedded in religion; Christian religion is still different, hyperreal space notions are just backgrounds, and you can change the background and have the actions be the same. Concerning the promise of immortality by ritual, doing the right thing and taking the proper sacrament does position transhumanism as Christian. It is an unintentional Christian cult operating inside a falsified belief system of materialism and by association, traditional (Protestant) Christians in the belief there is a God of the galaxy. The idea of bringing about any utopia (transhumanism included) on Earth is relatively Christian.
The math for Chadin’s cosmic singularity won’t allow it to be true; it does show its limitation. The Fibonacci sequence and phi ratio impart an infinite numbering system, which is also fractal, meaning you can’t reach the centre or endpoint. So, singularity in Chadin’s sense can only be discussed in the realm of philosophy rather than in the hopes of achieving it.
Eugenics, Futurism, and Neurotheology further popularised transhumanism; in eugenics, Aldous Huxley was their biggest promoter. Futurism, an idea popular among the Italians, focused on embracing the speed of technology and development. They were thwarted by wanting no part of history or memory of the past, an ideology that would steer them into fascism. It’s a mind-equal brain idea; it has that 19th-century Francis Golten Huxlian interpretation, uses or justification for white supremacy that they find in the claims of Darwin.
Neurotheology popularised Transhumansim even further, with the studies of neurological bases of religious experience suggesting evolutionary roots for human religiosity. Transhumanism is based on materialism rather than Satanism; it’s Satanic in a sense it goes against nature of life and death, but beyond that is just philosophical debate. Most believers in Transhumanism are Athiest, Agnostic, and Secular groups looking for an afterlife in the material. Suggests the religious impulse came out of the brain as an error to deal with death and that we can learn things about that, which can help us correct that error and stay here on earth – an idea that reinforces transhumanism as a cult ideology.
In Gematria 2561 = 2+5+6+1 = 14 means Dead
In Gematria 2501 = 2+5+0+1 = 08 means H
In Gematria 14 + 8 = 22 means Fake
As much as transhumanism positions itself as a Christian that survives unaware of an illegitimate claim of materialism, It’s not even at the level where a subdued scientific claim merits possibilities, it’s strictly fictional, and it probably has less validity than, say, Scientology in as much as both belief in science fiction as a methodology to be a real thing. Christian-Cospiricy groups tend to have narrow understanding due to an inherent limitation in their communications that’s been set for them in their belief systems. As are the transhumanist groups who grasp the unknown and try to deliver it through a materialistic apparatus. Otherwise, that limitation is further understood if other groups framed it, say, who study magic, which is broader, unbound by constraints and discernable in its reason for thought.
Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – Posthumansim, Light Particles, Thought Emotions & Revisions: The thing that predates or is a further extension of the Promethean Faustian archetype we find in the origins of the worlds mythologies – the oldest myth theme as far as we can tell is some kind of trickster god descending from the stars and gifting mankind technologies or tools than disappearing. The story of humans and tools given by the spirits is there from the beginning; when understood narrowly, like Christian conspiracy and fundamentalism, it will polarise it through self-interest in right-leaning politics, which promotes the most simplistic meaning. As a result, it misses a greater insight or meaning that may lead you to a synchronistic whole, what I would also call perfect equilibrium.
There is a common thread throughout my previous essay, along with this one, regarding how one expresses their humanness, If not to live our lives, struggling with the dynamic of an impossible balance – through what is perceived as normal behaviour. In some aspects, it’s a posthumanist argument. Christianity and fundamentalism tend to polarise their worldview and are quite simplistic in their understanding of a larger whole. They’re also struggling with an impossible balance of history and the outcome of a possible conspiratorial future. Their profound constitutional systems led half the country and modernised Western civilisation. It permitted a complex society without losing necessary internal differences. At the same time, it normalised slavery racism in a utilitarian, rational manner. The normalisation of this abnormality would lead to civil war. Moreover, now they must not forget the abnormal, but also not forget what came out of it.
Furthermore, now preoccupied with technocratic power and conspiracy rhetoric, it’s designed to marginalise our reality of responsible individuality and replace it with abstract and technological forces beyond our control. One wonders if they have too much on their plate; if they continue with the latter and forget the history, it reinforces a simplistic or narrow field of understanding regarding a greater whole.Some of your top-notch philosophers in history have come to equate such a notion in their way through their type of particularity.
Like Schopenhauer’s, one vast will describes our perception that consciousness is the physical brain seen from the inside. And what seems external on the perception of causality with all its corresponding impulses is ultimately combined into one vast will. In my analysis, we have the brain and consciousness; the brain isn’t necessarily the cause of consciousness but plays a factor. Along with our external perception likened to our perceived world, our hyperreal cosmos and satellization are all part of one vast will: humanity’s will or choice.
Schopenhauer’s one vast will assertion inspired or opened the door for other philosophers like Max Plank to give a postmodernist twist [to make it safe, let’s just say, thought experiment] in its deconstruction:
There is no matter as such, all matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter. — Max Planck.
How can we know what things are, in it of themselves, is appearance any reasonable reflection of reality? — Immanuel Kant.
You can see a combination of Schopenhauer’s work and Kant’s ideas in Max Planck’s work. Schopenhauer’s remark consciousness is the physical brain seen from the inside Kant, suggesting the mind has structures that impose structures in the world and actually create the world in certain cases. In comparsion it’s differentiated by the notion of choice as one vast will with a cosmic intelligent force, the source that makes possible all matter. In the suggestion that your choice has value on the outcome of a perceived world, what we call reality. Though important, it ultimately falls into just one factor in a more complex idea of a phenomenon (force): the mind of the matrix.
Max Planck was ambiguous about whether our collective conscious mind plays a role or is entirely separate from this force, this matrix, this intelligence. There is no reinforcement of the belief that the outside world depends on my experience. In this ambiguity, you can pretty much implant any other ideology into it. For instance, the Singularity notion in A.I where machines become self-aware is an error in thought, but does that mean it dismisses the notion of a matrix of the mind or a creator-god? You can see in this imbalance the error in thought still creates doubt when there is a lure of a creator mind. Or maybe it’s about accepting two points of thought: capturing the uncertainty inside a machine box as a tool, inside a machine-operated version of the cosmos. Or as thought forms with language and spells accompanying a living interacting cosmos within a community of beings.
In the machine cosmos, a combination of hyperreal languages in metaphysics alongside quantum physics ran away with it in their version of the cosmos. In their discussion of light, thoughts, emotion and feelings, atoms are like source codes, matrix codes of information, and these atoms can communicate with each other even light years apart; that’s because time and space are an illusion. Light is intimately connected to reality; it’s also found at the centre of the toroidal field, at the centre of your heart. Egyptian and Biblical teachings teach us that light is the first thing to emerge from creation; “let there be light.” A word for cosmic conciseness is light, and the vibration of light is closer to vibration energy, and we are light beings.
Electric magnetic radiation is all the particles and waves that we can’t see but make up the rest of our reality, which is attributed to dense light energy that manifests in many ways. Also, there is the light of spirit, which is awareness; the first manifestation of the physical dimension is light, similar to the light of the sun that we perceive; this light closely resembles the light we call spiritual light. So everything is light particles, energy atoms vibrating at extraordinary speeds that we call matter. On one level, the human body is flesh and bones; on another, the body is a waveform made from light and chakra points. These have waves of aura emanating from the body, electrons vibrating to give the illusion of solidarity that we call the body.
The framing of transhumanism and technocracy is downstream from these metaphysical descriptions aforementioned because transhumanism requires the meta-physics of tools. Still, it requires you to have a firm understanding of where the Human begins and ends. You can cross it and apply the Trans to the Human – what is the Human in Transhumanism? What is a Human being? And where does it begin and end? Esoteric thought, which sees the universe as fundamentally human-shaped.
If it is fundamentally human-shaped, what is the Ether in conjunction with the body? The Ether is a great cosmic mass of eternal forces of vibration and is made of both destructive and constructive vibrations. It is where we derive our inventions and thoughts; every known thought comes from this; we access it through thoughts and will, and some access it at higher levels. Some call this the Akashic records or the Arc Echelon; other terms include the unified field, the heavenly realm, the source field, and the energetic properties of matter. People in their sleep can access this, and it is where they discover their inventions, creations and imaginations. Before the great flood, people had higher vibrations and could easily access the Ether.
The Ether source energy is unified potential energy, the unified potential energy that needed to know itself; a source had to express itself to enable it to understand finite properties, so all the dimensions were created. As the nine dimensions were created, the vibrations and experiences became more separate until we arrived at this physical dimension, which is now in time (3rd dimension). Atoms are immortal; they never decompose, and when two atoms come together, they form a molecule when introduced to space. They separate but are still there; the atoms still live on when the molecule dies. When you die, your body decays, but your atoms continue; light is not only a wave and light property but particle light properties. Particles, in essence, are energetic vibration that appears static, finite and unchanging. This is why everything seems solid and real.
The grandness of the Ether invokes a type of insignificance similar to the vastness of space. What does this mean compared to spirits who came down and gave us tools? Was this just a momentary event within a larger cosmic moment in time? Did we give too much credit to them in doing so, creating a self-referential delusion of our world? Should we give more credit to the achievements of humanity’s imagination and creativity rather than an external alien? Did we forget to balance our humanness with that imbalance in front of us, often equated within the first imbalance of our first cosmic significance? Is this when we became posthumanist, android zombies with android phones? Did we ignore the trappings of transhumanism thought by being unaware that transhumanism is stuck in Western classical rationalism and dualistic ontology? Did humans start encapsulating themselves with transhumanist inherent mind and body separation, subject and object separation tied to technology?
There are new age elements in Max Plank’s philosophical quote, and the New Age is quite dependent on hyperreal-materialism (including hyperreal-space jargon); I suspect hyper-materialism has limitations, and New Age Doctrines allow them to progress slightly further. Combining mythology and hyperreal scientism gives us bad myths and bad science. However, naturally, it can help it do so; you can dissect the Bible, where it will impart a hidden message in the form of a factual science, like what is found in the formula table. As a result, it gives a genuine approach while imparting an intuitive act instead of something hyperrealistic.
I’ve argued that you must throw away aspects of hyperreal-space-materialistic notions of gravity (and hyperreal cosmology) within the theoretical work of quantum mechanics as a way to understand black holes and Big Bang theories (fictional stuff). Therefore, you can focus more on quantum mechanics [of the nuclear] and the molecular micro-model of genetic code. Weirdly, Max Plank used a hyperreal description, i.e. solar system, to describe atoms ‘holds this most minute solar system of the atom together,’ perhaps to paint a picture. You’ll find most of the hyperreal assertions borrow from the atomic world. As it were, there are movements in modern physics; new thinkers have determined because of quantum field theory or gravity, and quantum theory has indicated that there is no such thing as space-time fundamentally in the laws of physics. There is no such thing as gravity, only in the hyperreal sense, so I would describe it as hyperreal force and quantum theory.
They have concluded Einstein’s gravity (force) and quantum theory together, which entail space-time paradigm, cannot be fundamental, and therefore particles in space-time cannot be fundamental. They’re just eradicable representations of the symmetries of space-time. This means that gravity and quantum physics, which often define a hyperreal cosmos, have reached their limits. New physics, now, by excluding this ontology (component), can make measurable claims; mathematically, they can make billions of terms into one term. No doubt all credit goes to them, but it was a postmodernist claim, to begin with, by Baudrillard, J.
Most of Darwin’s work on evolution is wrong except for ‘principles of natural selection’, which needs to be understood; transformations of forms as a Darwinist theory are not a fact in nature; in reality, it is a ‘theory in transformation.’ This way elevates Darwin’s evolution, which is fine, but it will also credit all the wrong stuff, which is the majority. Evolution gave us adaptive behaviours; part of that process is hiding the truth and giving you substances of reality. In the matrix, Cyper says: ‘The image translators work for the construct program – but there’s too much information to decode the Matrix.’ I distinctly remember him saying the program excludes construct; it’s just me; I’m having a mandella effect moment. For transhumanism’s singularity moment, you would have to build or construct something (an interface) that can outpace the fabric void of infinity while waiting for self-awareness to come online, which is impossible.
There is no universe; there is only the universe in you. Everything breaks down to a level that one wishes to observe. 3D plain is just an illusion of electrons, protons, and neurons buzzing around at great speeds, creating the illusion of matter, time and space. If everything, material or matter, are just possible movements of consciousness, and choosing moments of movements to bring experience to manifestation, it may be accurate, but it’s incomplete; it allows a factor in determinism as an excuse for things like war crimes and genocide; it was determined or just movements of consciousness. We can’t dismiss the failure of determinism, and the failure, in reality, is just an illusion concept.
Ahriman’s [Lucifer’s] Technologies – Kant’s Revsions: Kant put the brakes on such notions and would become a revisional beacon to a runaway thought – by advocating that we do not perceive a pre-given world, but the structure of the mind is bringing forth phenomenon. Created by; as much as the mind, that’s, by whatever is out there. When you sit at a table and touch the table and see the table, you have this phenomenon; you have this conscious experience of colour and shape of tactile pressure, but these phenomena are not the ultimate causes. Kant was convinced that there was something beyond that. Something out there is generating these sense perceptions and giving them to us.
In a revising a quote, “3D plain is just an illusion of electrons, protons, and neurons, buzzing around in great speeds creating the illusion of matter, time and space; while simultaneously been given to us by God, and having the ability to change consciousness as part of God’s children. This statement by Carl Sagan: “The earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena.” Now, with my revised statement, “The earth is a stage, in the centre of the universe, in a vast dimensional, parallel cosmic consciousness arena.”
Max Planck says, “We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind.” What is this intelligent mind? Is it our individual and collective consciousness or something else? Yes and no because we can collectively and individually change the matter through our psyche or physically in a material form or within the program. However, it still needs a stage to do it, and who is responsible for this stage (earth plane)? Is it our God? In death and rebirth, there is a singularity point, and that point emanates light, which sets the stage for consciousness to manifest.
What is the space between void and awareness, all the states of matter and energy, and this is the centre of the toroidal field? The world of energy and matter connect “as above, so below.” We engage these two worlds simultaneously; we are essentially vessels of light. We are not the outside or the inside of our physical vessel, but we are the awareness and creator, not the creator, but a creator.
Singularity is not the birth of A.I. (Ahriman Intelligence) but merely a borrowed term for black hole gateways. When defined this way, it allows a version of the cosmos to be part of something more complex than human understanding. As opposed to the other interpretation that borrows hyperreal notions of a singularity with a hyperreal cosmos – intermingled with transhumanism- sorcery becomes tech-sorcery. Ironically, it is fuelled by its opposite, Christian fundamentalism and its rhetoric. Both do beliave the catalyst is the magic. However, both are inadequate for understanding the intricacies and complexities of magic. Technocracy and transhumanism cannot update themselves, while fundamentalism is strictly dogmatically reactionary. So, when you get a quote like this by Kevin Kelly, it only deepens their insufficiency: “The Technium is primed to hijack matter and rearrange its atoms to infiltrate it with séance” – What technology wants Pg 328.
This is basically Cat Nip for both polarsing adversaries. We’ve already explained why reductionasim except when it’s useful like explaing thermal dynamics, which is really a factor in communication and imagery anymways, is on its way out. Particles in space-time cannot be fundamental, and in that regard to a built machine that is able to hijack matter and atoms is thwarted by the inability to build the machine. This is mathematically proved by a factor of infinity to one or its empirical fraction (a drop in the ocean measurement) a billion to one – to which the billion is part of an infinite scale. Alongside the principle of particles the move on observance, a machine that cannot be built with or without a mind cannot capture particles.
The use of séance as a magical term conveys imagery that spirits in its supernatural setting can move objects. Assumes in its most simplistic understanding of magic that spirits have particles in them to which they can move objects, or magic somehow takes control of particles to move objects. The machine is driven by magic; if it is driven by magic, it’s no longer self-aware; it’s not a sentient of its making but just a Tulpa. This is why magicians have a more nuanced interpretation regarding spirits and technology or tools. It’s productive and useful; at a certain point, it becomes counter-productive. As it becomes a means to an end, to an end itself – fundamentalist speak reached its end in terms of magical understanding and is merely a means to invoke reactions. We’ve reached that with some of the transhumanist platforms also.
In this machine-operated version of the cosmos, the tools spirits gave us became a subsequent Cain and Abel imbalance and dual nature. Cain (the evil side of humanity) and his technology made him rich and ruler of the modern world, a holographic world in collapse, a matrix of sorts, from whom rich materialist cultists wish to escape. Alongside, their transhumanism goal is to have you resonate with the cloud rather than the divine intelligence, in a far more conspiratorial notion to enslave the human soul in technological imprisonment. Resonating with intelligence doesn’t abdicate technology; it does mean having the sophisticated metaphysics of tools. However, the idea that efficiency is the only way out is perplexing. At least those with magical understanding can separate magic and the limits of technology and have the nuance to recognise technocracy and transhumanism many ideologies. So, you can position yourself not to be polarising but rather that the framing must have a cosmic significance, like a vision, enlightenment, and experience you can relate to.
Quantum/meta-physics would make you believe that our minds and consciousness are everything. Could it be that they’re only half right when you factor in Kant’s philosophical basis. There is alo putting self before God-hood, is separating God – which you must not do? Doing this would be an error in the program. God became man, so man can become God, which can be achieved through enlightenment (Christ consciousness), spiritual practice, and other forms (psychedelia) or just by the grace of God. Spiritual enlightenment doesn’t mean the end; it just means another level to the end. It comes in waveforms; it comes and goes; that’s why spiritualists are always chasing it because when it’s gone, they’re ultimately ordinary like everyone else. The only difference is that they know where they want to be.