Occultism and Post-awakening Natures:
Dancing in the Sliding Scales of Ideals: Refers to the natural processes of our amorphic cultural descent – It’s a dance because as much as we know what is going on; we can’t dismiss the fact that there is this other ‘thing’ attached to the effect of those movements. Take for instance the very unrestraint and politically correct [woke-isim] barrage on the entertainment industry notably on writers and directors who have to balance their artistic integrity against an agenda. An agenda run by a group who seems to think they know what ethically correct ideals are. And we know ethics without debate is ethically unsound, and we know there is confusion towards ethics with morality. However, most of the social issues being brought up by woke-isim still need to be addressed with some restraint; otherwise it’s a recipe for disaster.
Ethics doesn’t pay; for example, the social security’s socialist model is always tunnelled through a managerial no-win situation. By following the rule in bureaucratic ethical policy, as to not set yourself up for fraud, imposes the other for disclosure of personal information, and when denied it’s cancelled [meaning you don’t get paid]. The ever prevailing maritime law juxtaposed with natural law, the latter chooses to see the value in people, not as an individual of the land but a corporation, and authority built upon people’s consent. It relies on ignorance and false memory files to impose fake referents of the word. By defining man as persons, a person is a corporation, and man is not. This system doesn’t benefit the individual in any way; liabilities are disguised as benefits.
Ethics doesn’t pay because it’s not utilitarian, but is treated as a serious matter – from debating things like death penalty and feeding the poor. Ethics doesn’t pay in so much as you’re dammed if you do; dammed if you don’t. Seems to parallel entertainment groups that have a lot to lose … are then brought down, knowing that if they go woke they’ll go broke – and knowing if they don’t go woke they’ll still go broke. Both is a gamble, but one has a chance of a sure thing, while the other is doomed from the get go.
Woke-isim acts on Strindberg’s quote “kindly control your imagination …That is what makes men beasts” – although they’re not identifying the fear of uncertainty. They are instead; controllers of your imaginations, a politically (in)correct meme virus with an agenda. There is the assumption that creativity can be bottled manufactured like a factory-process-line. And we first had glimpses of this when rationalists or scientifically minded worldview was introduced to creativity as an approach to that creative process. And we know it’s not science because science is pedantic, this is quasi-science [science-fiction] – the fictional aspect act as a small window for the imagination inside an infinitely vast universe, but we know that vast universe is just the backdrop for the imagination.
And we know there is a version of science that is outside science-fiction, but it is still science-fiction or scientism. This is where the new-atheists and rationalists established their religion, but it’s failing, and I believe this was due to the flat-earth movement infamously having had an impact. This version of scepticism, which is unhealthy, had morphed itself into the woke-movement groups. Given how sceptics and Atheists have been recruiting geeks to their cause, and it gave the first clue to creativity being hijacked by the imposition of identity politics. This seems important in the realm of media, but outside of it’s just something to laugh about or laugh away.
There is an argument suggesting mixing science with mysticism is a bad idea, but perhaps this mutual exclusivity can only be definitive in a way that matches the notion of anti-oneness proposition – given it’s a fact outside sensory perceptions are being given to us. Science’s mysticism aspect is Scientism because they’ve taken the icons of gods and reduced it to a satellized cosmos with all the made-up laws they’ve adopted. A truer distinction is perhaps not mixing science that requires tests, evaluations and results with mysticism, but mysticism that is more in tune with superstition.
A rock may not have spirit as an animist might view it, but it may have vibrational frequencies that keep it static and impenetrable. At the same time it was Niels Bohr that declared: “There is no quantum world; there is only a quantum description.” How does one acquire memory-files or states of consciousness for the quantum world, we can only give theoretical qualities [referent]. It’s asking for faith, which is religious.
Spiritual science was a term to convey liberal subjects; literature, music, etc. as physical science. Then spiritual-materialism came about to identify that there is an all-pervading spirit underlining various forms of phenomenon. This was categorized as identity of spirit or psyche functions instead of mere brain functions like spiritual- materialism.
When science-fiction or pseudo-science (scientism) steps outside of narrative entertainment it becomes manipulation. True science as a visionary and mystic as art, as Newton and Tesla have given us (like the electrical magnetic field that’s around us reinforced in the cross-section of ley lines found notably in Egypt’s pyramid). This process has become an idolatry symbol for the imposition of pseudo-scientific principles in real life like the innumerable concepts of satellization. At the same time in this weird paradox; satellization acts the same way as myth-makers, but narrow in its imagination, but infinite in its backdrop [the infinite universe]. From the likes of Kaku who identified that string theory mirrors the concept of the Zohar and Kabbala. Maybe so, but the result is always reductionist as the mysteries gave it more personality.
What is missing is Jung’s concept of psycho-spiritual-transformations what he calls [possibly incorrect spelling: ‘enantiodromia’ process], which has similarity with the spiritual-awakening-process, which nobody knows what to do with when it strikes. It’s about being aware that creativity is the result of what is around and inside us, and how it penetrates the human essence; resulting in awareness that man is the creator of spirit and that he possesses it. And so this brings us to those with great imaginings what Schopenhauer describes as the one: ‘who is endowed with imagination as able, as it were, to call up spirits’ these are the artist-prophets that sits at the highest mountain, whose contributions had an impact on culture and society. Schopenhauer also concluded that same quote that can best describe the dichotomy I’m talking about: ‘Therefore the man without imagination is related to him, as the mussel fastened to its rock’ the producer by numbers, the committee and now with woke-isim is the man without imagination and is there waiting for those with great imaginings to come down from their mountain.
Woke-isim may have grown out of sceptics and new-Atheism given its process of thinking is similar and so one can conclude that this is indeed the case. Although woke-isim acts more like a decompiling virus, and I believe the notion of identity-politics originated in Christian-theology with a focus on eschatology; the notion ‘the marginalized will triumph in the end, and in the kingdom of heaven.’ And woke’s new label as Puritans can only support that claim. The contention argument or perhaps the elite’s recognized that and concluded … no way that’s going to happen, and so employed these woke-puritans as a way to even it out. The speculation that it might also come from a far-right totalitarian clandestine group made evident in their need to forget to highlight a racial radical movement.
Woke’s ideological simplicity, as well as Fundamentalism’s ideological absolutes and absolutism, are both recipes for disaster, but only one seems to act as a permanent constant because it attaches itself to a timeless myth. You could argue that absolute ideology came to light due to how biblical literature is parsed, but that would assume that Christians can’t distinguish what the Holy Book said in that time, to how people live their lives now. There needs to a benefit of the doubt given what memory is, and how memory acts.
Evangelicalism that is outside conspiracy theory or political agendas is somewhat in the same vein as traditional Christians. Attempt to manage the creative-imaginative-process through Evangelical filters. This means a Christianized imitation of some secular genre or style. Christian sports stories, Christian detective stories, Christian sex manuals, Christian heavy metal, and Christian self-help books – it’s all second-hand recycling of old mainstream ideals. Which are all pretty much stale in comparison – this is due to how linear Evangelicalism is when it communicates – with the immense pressure to conform to authority it destroys the creative process. This is insidious, but it’s really within its own bubble where creativity is stifled as managed creativity starts at the roots. Whereas woke is parasitic that attaches to creative ideas already fully realized, which is far-reaching. This is the kind of reach Evangelicalism wants, but doesn’t have, and only reinforces my speculation.
Their linear perspective doesn’t allow a means for better communication. The need to conform and submit to authority has a habit to diminish any creativity an Evangelical might have. The outcome will always be derivative. There is a habit to discourage individual thought, which ironically the promotion of individuality is a staple of right-politics. However, outside of Evangelicalism and conspiracy theory the same sorts of debasement happens even amongst creative outside the shackles biblical authority, but adhere instead to a corporation, and in some ways can be a modern marginalization of the imagination.
If woke-isim is indeed an offshoot of (atheism) scepticism, reductionism, and rationalism where does that leave intuition and imagination? It’s as stifling as Evangelical filters aforementioned. It points to the notion that secularism can lead to nihilism. In the last post, we discussed the process of Vitvan’s general semantics, which is about images and feelings appearing as substantive heading towards synthesis then oneness. This makes woke-isim a repellent to general semantics because woke is a process in reductionism that doesn’t grasp full synthesis.
The awakened as oppose to being woke realizes that they have awakened to a world that is simulated and to go deeper; holographic. And this event builds up a lot of existential dilemmas about reality. The film ‘I heart Huckabees’ a film about a group who hires existential detectives to solve their existential problems. Albert hires them to solve his coincidences whether they are insignificant or meaningful.
Albert’s ark goes from being superficial to nihilism to self-actualization. His coincidences [represented in an African door-man] would lead him into a Christian home where the Sudanese man lives as a home-stay. This is the film’s subtle way of showing his self-actualization would lead him to Christianity. Given how Christianity [perhaps not faith itself] in some ways can be secular … and in light of awakening to a world that is simulated and driven by reductionism. His self-actualization; his synthesis leading into oneness … is that his coincidences are leading him into spirituality. There is something to be said also about existential detectives that can be surmised more profoundly as of-shoots of synchronistic-mystics.
Earth-Image and Evolution-idolatry Cyphered through General Semantics: Christian-fundamentalism is also an off-shoot of those ‘men without imagination’. The theist sects implore or even support the satellization cosmos as well as the wrong aspects of evolution. In the last post where we outline Vitvan’s general semantics about restraining from using words/images with no proper referent has been established. And it would be from traditional Christian fundamentalist Kent Hovind that took this process or tool [unknowingly] and recognized that the images that were used to convey many of (Darwin’s) evolution’s fallacy.
The tool for this awareness [Vitvan’s Semantics] can be challenged usually by groups with an agenda who are aware by giving false-referents means they can establish a false absolute. Evolution and its notable subject natural selection turned out to be … in one particular sense not the cause of evolution, but ensure the bad ones don’t survive. However, it’s not going to change into something else entirely, and a more definitive word to use is variation. Embryo development identifies gills in the embryo cells, this is incorrect they are the proto growth for the ears and throat, and have nothing to do with breathing. Haeckel illustrated these fake drawings in 1874, however, real photos turned up and Haeckel’s assumptions would be proven wrong, although his drawings are still used in educational textbooks unto the later part of 1999 (not sure of the present time).
Hackel’s attempt for a false-to-fact abstraction coincides with the hyperreal-space’s attempt to create a fake map of the universe when the map is not the territory. Akin to Baudrillard’s fable; only in his view the map is the simulacrum that has meaning, but as a model loses all reference to reality. Hackel’s fake image (illustrations) is not the label nor the reference nor the referent. And it’s clearly an attempt to be all of those through hyperrealism; through the simulated.
Another tangent simulation the hyperreal-space in which the image of the Earth is a composite of data sets from several different instruments translated into a picture. And a notable person in charge of this is (Nasa’s) Rob Simmons. He says; “it is photo-shopped …but it has to be,” and so this is where one set of suspicions lies, hoaxes (moon-landings, and space travels) act as a simultaneous ‘false and real’ referent or reference when all they have is the false Label. This leaves us with a hyperreal-space notion. Space-shuttles and rockets take-offs are real to a point they’re not, our inability to pass a certain point is halted by something unimaginable to human understanding.
Scientists don’t know where all matters come from, where the laws came from, where the energy came from. Also, the notion that is the conservation of angular momentum, (if the universe began in a swirling dot), why do two planets spin backward? (Venus, Uranus, and possibly Pluto rotate backward from other planets). Six of the 63 moons rotate backward, Jupiter, Saturn, and Neptune. Intelligent people have concluded that scientism (not science itself) is a religion because it asks for you to believe, and so the same can be said for the majority of what Evolution advocates. The dialectical argument of believing God created heaven and earth 6000 thousand years ago to that of life stemming out of a rock or a pool 4.6 billion years ago. The many assumptions of different species having common ancestors are thereby differentiated by the many original species it has common with. This is another example of a secular argument assuming materialism for the argument, the many different species of birds that Darwin found in the Galapagos Islands have a common ancestor and that ancestor is still the Bird. The many species of birds cannot be equated (or related) to something different entirely, and they are just mere variations.
The fallacy of fossils that such evidence cannot determine related species and that all the ancestors are, therefore, determine by bones, and within that inclusion of false to fact reference that certain animals back then has the abilities to do something that animals of today can’t. Steven Gaul states; “the absence of fossils evidence for any immediate stages is a persistent and nagging problem for evolution” they can look for the missing links as long as they wish, but how do you find something that doesn’t exist.
The fallacy of carbon dating ascribes to assumptions and so, therefore, is unreliable, using Kent Hovind’s analogy of a burning candle, if someone was to come across a burning candle and another person asks; ‘when was the candle lit? It’s undetermined as the candle was burning before he got there. Through empirical science, the height and rate of burn of the candle are determined by the rate of burn of one inch per hour, but the fire in which it was lit is still undetermined unless you are willing to make assumptions. So, you can determine the amount […] this can be measured and the rate of decay, but that is all. How much […] was in it at death and whether or not the decay rate has been constant are not provable. Samples of known age Radioisotope dating don’t work while samples of unknown age Radioisotope dating are assumed to work.
Iconoclasm; Cyphered through General Semantics: When talking about intent and symbolism [images] it becomes a grey area because once it’s in motion the symbols start to become their own stories. Symbols are part of a program on several different levels, in our conscious and unconscious mind, and our DNA and culture. Sure a designer might be exploring with symbolism or has allegory to tell, but it’s all very nebulous, you can try to be methodical, but most often than not, it’s recycling of an image. There is only one way to draw a square, triangle, and circle. Then, there is the aspect where the symbolism creeps in because the artist is playing with themes, and finds him being pulled under. Symbols start to tell their own stories; the symbols activate the part of the brains that you didn’t even know were being activated.
A symbol taking on its form and stories can be hijacked if its true intent has been dormant for millennia like the Swastika symbol. This is a sort of iconoclasm [reject the meaning of the image, but keep the image] for another label as to define a false-referent. The Swastika was adopted and inverted to corrupt its symbolic meaning, and the term ‘Aryan’ has a special sinister history since the Nazis used it for their idea of the ‘chosen’ people, being the German race. The original term ‘Aryan’ is mentioned in the Indian sacred books, the Vedas. ‘Aryan’ alludes to the wise men, the rishis or seers of northern India. It was later redefined by the Orientalists who have made ‘Aryans’ of all Europeans. The Nazi writers then adopted the word and redefined it to mean the German race. Extreme right-wing groups have also been found to use the term “Aryan race” to mean the white race, the national alliance a right-wing group adopted the term ‘natural order’ to convey their idea of the position of the white race.
This confusion of meaning arises in people’s minds and thoughts, and they don’t realize what Blavatsky’s definition of such a notion to mean ‘type of consciousness, ‘principle of consciousness to be developed’, etc., and not that of skin colour. Indians view this connotation as something to be admired as its part of their Vedic terminology, as oppose to the racist one. The corruption of this symbolic meaning has been finger-pointed to theosophy; however, it was Jorg Lanzvon Liebenfels who is a Nazi writer to a large extent is responsible for this denigration of ancient symbols and scriptures. He is responsible for developing the movement of ariosophy, a debased version of theosophy. They’re responsible for the debased version of Friedrich Nietzsche’s term “Ubermensch.”
The first capital city of Sumerians was called ‘Ur’ of the Chaldeans the surrounding area also encompassed, Akkadian, Babylonian, and Assyrian at around 4000 B.C. Sumerians was an important city as it forwarded the basis of many technologies in the world. An example the written language which took the form of iconographic writing [cuneiform] – notice the words icon and graphic coming out of ‘iconographic,’ it’s a series of lines creating pictographs. Then it was replaced by the Phoenician alphabet [some icons have similarity with the English alphabet] near the neo-Syrian empire.
In an area called the Fertile Crescent [cradle of civilizations spanning: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Jordan, and Egypt] in the Neolithic times arose mankind’s early form of religion. Mesopotamia [Iraq] is known as the land between two rivers Euphrates and Tigris, those two rivers meeting together to the south near Basra called that city Gurnay. In this place, there was a Garden of Eden and they had a Tree of worship there, the Tree was called Adam-Tree. In light of flat-earth and one’s own individual intuitive component – their Garden of Eden and Tree representation are just symbolic alters for the sacred centre.
As we know the Phoenician people [sea-people] were remnants of Atlantis civilizations and the location of the city of Atlantis have been debated, but I believe it to be the once fertile area, the concentric island located in the North-Pole. The Atlanteans (or Phaeacians) worshipped their central pillar that has cosmological value to the Polaris Star [tail end of little bear constellation] in conjunction with Ursa Major [great-bear] makes a swastika symbol. This symbol depicts the four seasons that rotate or moves around the Polaris Star [North-Star] as opposed to the earth moving around it. This symbol is essentially a cross with horizontal lines at each point, which in my opinion symbolizes the stars and constellations (aside from a few which are static) rotations. And without those horizontal lines, it is essentially a Cross, a symbol to mark the spot; the centre, pillar, tree, etc. And the Phoenicians for a thousand years used that symbol, and would later be adopted by the Templars.
A sculpture of King depicting Shamash in the British Museum depicts him wearing a cross necklace that predates Christianity. The statue itself was erected in the capital city of Kalua (modern Nimrud) by the Assyrian king Shashi-Adad V (reigned 824-811 BC). The king wears a large Maltese on his chest as an alternative symbol of Shamash, god of the sun and justice. The cross is also known as the croix pattée alésée arrondie, and would later be co-opted by the Knights Templar, primarily in the stone carvings. The adopting of this cross is identified with Sun god eight centuries before Christ by the Templars; the Templars itself is possibly a branch of solar cults such as Shemsu Hor (followers of Horus). This certainly puts into conflict the argument that Christianity and Solarism are contiguous systems separated only by politics.
In the Stauros it is defined as an upright stake, what the Zionists added was [hence a cross (the Rom instrument of crucifixion)], which was not originally there. The cross was used in ancient Pagan religion notably Egyptian religion and was used as a symbol of good fortune and good luck. Other cultures such as the Babylonian, Persian, Indian, and so forth also used the cross symbol, the symbol itself is universal, and pre-dated the Messiah, and can be validated in the Encyclopedia (Britannica). Although the Esoteric-Christian-Movement would call the Messiah (or the Father) … Yahuah/Yahusha and are adamant that words such as ‘Lord’ and ‘God’ are not names, but are titles. The Egyptian had the Cross and the Ank, the Ank being a variation of the Cross was utilized in many ways, not just as a symbol that reflects nature, but as a tool for revitalizing sexual energy.
In the X-files ‘the gift’ the circular-cross-symbol or divine-cross is described as a medicine wheel a symbol for healing associated with north-American shamans. The circle represents the continuum of life and death and the intersecting lines; one represents happiness; the other sorrow. This is somewhat similar to the divine cross in Kabbalah the wheel of incarnation. The shamans use it as a symbol to summons the soul-eater that would eat away the sickly (literally).
Then there is the 2012 Madonna symbol. Madonna recently having strange [social-media] diary posts about the Covid quarantines, where she describes it as ‘the great equalizer.’ The pop singer has a net value of 600 million dollars probably chose the wrong word for her reference. Maybe use the word atomizer instead. The Symbol used in the ritualized super bowl half-time event seems to depict the letter M intersected with the X symbol – she stands above the symbol; above the sacred centre with the letter M standing in for wings. The letter M also means mother-goddess-[scarlet or anti-Venus] – it’s also a zig-zag depiction. In Kenneth Grant’s book cover, the zig-zag depicts contact with daemons. I’m not saying there is association merely pointing out that in the early ’60s some celebrities was deeply fixated on Crowley’s world in which Kenneth Grant was a student off. And Madonna is no stranger to kabbalah.
Sages may condemn using images as a way to perceive the nature of being as it may lean towards idolatry and to deny it completely becomes iconoclasm for one of those reasons being is that thought-images manifest language into matter. Ironically, it’s the iconoclasts with their imperative disdain to consciously negate the image that put forward the image’s true value. Much the same way Atheists having had dissected the Bible to prove to the world its inherent fallacy (one of those fallacies – which truthers are on board with – is the Bible having been re-written by the Catholic Church), and in doing so give themselves more of an understanding for the transcendental than your average Christians, Atheists only being limited by their passive role and nihilism.
And researchers that sway towards an Esoteric-Christian-Movement but not inherently defining themselves with such a label have pointed out (in a post-Zeitgeist world) that Jesus was not hung in a cross but hung in a tree – the image of that is illustrated in the Arcana cards. It is also stated in Deuteronomy chapter 21-23, that the punishment for sin is worthy of death and is to be hung from a tree. What is not in scripture, however, (this includes the Torah and Old Testament) is any mention of being hung in a cross; I guess you could say these are some of the first transcribed fake news/hoaxes that can be validated.
